Project Plant Protein: the P3 Study in Humans

NCT ID: NCT02933424

Last Updated: 2018-01-25

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 20 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2016-09-30
• Study Completion Date: 2017-10-26

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the effects of adding three plant-based proteins (rice, oats and pea proteins) to a breakfast beverage on the glycemic response, appetite and subsequent food intake of healthy adults.

Detailed Description

A diet or a meal higher in dietary protein has been reported to promote satiety and suppress food intake in humans in several previous studies. It was suggested that the presence of amino acid in the blood as a result of higher protein intake served as signals that suppress appetite in humans. More recently, it has been observed that incomplete or lower quality proteins, i.e. those missing one or more essential amino acids, may suppress hunger more than complete proteins, as the ingestion of incomplete proteins in the long term may lead to deficiency of essential amino acids. Plant proteins are generally considered incomplete protein when compared to animal proteins, which mean that plant protein may have higher appetite-suppressing effects.

Dietary carbohydrates are the most potent stimuli of insulin secretion. However, the addition of dietary protein in a carbohydrate-rich meal has been shown to further stimulate insulin release.The insulinotropic effect of dietary protein is thought to be attributed to the branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) content of the protein-rich meal. Interestingly, there is a hierarchy of effects induced by protein from different sources. For example, milk protein has been shown to be superior to fish or plant protein in stimulating insulin secretion following a meal.Even within milk protein, whey protein stimulated insulin secretion more than casein protein. One of the factors that distinguish whey from casein proteins was the digestibility or the digestion rate of these proteins. Protein that is digested faster appear to increase blood amino acid levels faster, and increase insulin release faster.This implies that plant proteins that have lower digestibility rate relative to animal proteins may have lower insulinotropic effects, and the effective dose required to achieve optimal insulin secretion may be different from animal protein and warrants further investigation. In addition, the amino acid profile (in addition to lower digestibility) of plant proteins may differ from animal protein, especially the BCAA content that is associated with the stimulation of insulin secretion.

Dietary patterns and cuisines vary between countries and cultures. Unlike in the Western countries, plant-based foods are more commonly consumed in an Asian cuisine. Based on the statistics released by Food and Agriculture Organization, cereals and meat are the top two protein sources in both Western (29.1% and 26.4% respectively) and Asian (58.8% and 8.6% respectively) countries. The third major source of protein is dairy (16.7%) in Western countries, and pulses in Asia (7.4%). In addition, vegetarianism is widely practiced in Asian countries. Studies investigating the appetitive and the blood glucose regulating effects of dietary protein have been focused predominantly in animal protein, with a number of studies included plant-based protein such as soy protein. Since cereals and pulses are an important part of an Asian cuisine, it is important to understand and compare the effects of proteins from these sources on blood glucose and appetite regulation. Since the amino acid profile and the digestibility of these plant-based proteins differ from animal protein, it is important to also understand the effective dose that exerts optimal effects.

Conditions

Pre-diabetes; Obesity

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: CROSSOVER
• Primary Study Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Control beverage with no protein powder

Standard breakfast drink with no protein powder added

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Beverage with Rice protein powder 25 grams

Standard breakfast drink with 25 grams of rice protein powder.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Protein Powder

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Beverage with Pea protein powder 25 grams

Standard breakfast drink with 25 grams of pea protein powder.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Protein Powder

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Beverage with Oats protein powder 25 grams

Standard breakfast drink with 25 grams of Oats protein powder.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Protein Powder

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Interventions

Protein Powder

Intervention Type: DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Males
• BMI 18.5-24.9kgm-2
• eating all meals (5 days/week)

Exclusion Criteria

• major chronic disease such as heart disease, cancer, hypertension or diabetes mellitus
• have gout
• have food allergies
• are taking insulin or drugs known to affect metabolism, appetite and body fat distribution,
• have weight change of >5kg in the past 3 months
• have major medical or surgical event requiring hospitalisation within the preceding three months
• are on a weight loss regime, and presence of disease or drugs which influence digestion and absorption of nutrients
• smokers,
• individuals who take part in sports at competitive/endurance levels

• Minimum Eligible Age: 21 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 45 Years
• Eligible Sex: MALE
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

JeyaKumar Henry

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Clinical Nutrition Research Centre

Singapore, , Singapore

Countries

Singapore

References

Tan SY, Siow PC, Peh E, Henry CJ. Influence of rice, pea and oat proteins in attenuating glycemic response of sugar-sweetened beverages. Eur J Nutr. 2018 Dec;57(8):2795-2803. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1547-3. Epub 2017 Sep 30.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 28965176 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

2016/00796

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id