Clinical Study of LPI on Different Sites of Iris

NCT ID: NCT02870504

Last Updated: 2016-09-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Glaucoma is the second cause of blindness worldwide. Laser peripheral iridoplasty (LPI) is a simple and effective treatment for angle closure glaucoma. LPI can widen or reopen an existing angle close or angle adhesion in order to reduce the risk of attack of the angle closure glaucoma. However, there are very little research on the laser site, laser wavelengths, laser energy and laser spot intervals. The purpose of this study is to determine the optimum laser site of LPI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Glaucoma is the second cause of blindness worldwide. Laser peripheral iridoplasty (LPI) is a simple and effective treatment for angle closure glaucoma. LPI can widen or reopen an existing angle close or angle adhesion in order to reduce the risk of attack of the angle closure glaucoma. However, there are very little research on the laser site, laser wavelengths, laser energy and laser spot intervals.

The purpose of this study is to determine the optimum laser site of LPI. Before and 7days, 1 month, 3 months after LPI, the structure of anterior chamber, including angle anterior chamber depth(ACD), angle of anterior chamber (AA), anterior chamber angle opening distance 750(AOD750) are measured with ultrasound biomicroscopy. Before and 7days, 1 month, 3 months after LPI, the outflow resistance of aqueous humor are evaluated with C value. Before and 1hour, 1days, 3day, 7days, 1 month, 3 months after LPI, intraocular pressure are measured with Goldmann tonometry. Before and 3 months after LPI, retinal nerve layer thickness and the optic disc cup disc ratio are measure with optical coherence tomography.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glaucoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

corneoscleral limbus group

Laser spot locates on the corneoscleral limbus.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Corneoscleral limbus group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laser spot locates on the corneoscleral limbus

One spot group

Laser spot locates on one spot away from the corneoscleral limbus

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

one spot group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laser spot locates on one spot away from the corneoscleral limbus

Two spots group

Laser spot locates on two spots away from the corneoscleral limbus

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

two spots group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laser spot locates on two spots away from the corneoscleral limbus

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Corneoscleral limbus group

Laser spot locates on the corneoscleral limbus

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

one spot group

Laser spot locates on one spot away from the corneoscleral limbus

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

two spots group

Laser spot locates on two spots away from the corneoscleral limbus

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with primary angle closure suspect (PACS), primary angle closure (PAC) or primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG).
* PACS is diagnosed in eyes with an occludable angle but no other abnormality.
* PAC is diagnosed in eyes with an occludable angle, normal optic discs and visual fields and any of the following: raised IOP (\>19 mm Hg), PAS, pigment smearing in the superior angle, or sequelae of acute angle closure (iris whirling or glaucomatous fleck).
* PACG is diagnosed in eyes with an occludable angle and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Evidence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy is defined as a cup: disc ratio (CDR) of \>0.7 or \>0.2 CDR asymmetry.
* An occludable angle is defined as one in which three quarters of the posterior pigmented trabecular meshwork is not visible on viewing with a Goldmann two mirror lens in the primary position of gaze without indentation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with previous ocular surgery, and those with secondary angle closure, such as lens intumescence or subluxation, iris neovascularisation and a history of uveitis.
* Patients who have systemic contraindications to medical therapy (including renal impairment, sulfur allergy, asthma and heart failure), pre-existing corneal opacities obstructing laser access to more than one quadrant of the peripheral iris and single-eyed patients are also excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maosong Xie

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maosong Xie, doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of ophthalmology, First Affilited Hospital of Fujian Medical University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lai J, Choy BN, Shum JW. Management of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2016 Jan-Feb;5(1):59-62. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000180.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26886121 (View on PubMed)

Narayanaswamy A, Baskaran M, Perera SA, Nongpiur ME, Htoon HM, Tun TA, Wong TT, Goh D, Su DH, Chew PT, Ho CL, Aung T. Argon Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty for Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ophthalmology. 2016 Mar;123(3):514-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26707418 (View on PubMed)

Marchini G, Chemello F, Berzaghi D, Zampieri A. New findings in the diagnosis and treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Prog Brain Res. 2015;221:191-212. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26518079 (View on PubMed)

Sng CC, Aquino MC, Liao J, Zheng C, Ang M, Chew PT. Anterior segment morphology after acute primary angle closure treatment: a randomised study comparing iridoplasty and medical therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;100(4):542-8. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307087. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26294102 (View on PubMed)

Wright C, Tawfik MA, Waisbourd M, Katz LJ. Primary angle-closure glaucoma: an update. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 May;94(3):217-25. doi: 10.1111/aos.12784. Epub 2015 Jun 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26119516 (View on PubMed)

Fu J, Qing GP, Wang NL, Wang HZ. Efficacy of laser peripheral iridoplasty and iridotomy on medically refractory patients with acute primary angle closure: a three year outcome. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Jan;126(1):41-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23286475 (View on PubMed)

Lee JR, Choi JY, Kim YD, Choi J. Laser peripheral iridotomy with iridoplasty in primary angle closure suspect: anterior chamber analysis by pentacam. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;25(4):252-6. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.4.252. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21860572 (View on PubMed)

Mochizuki H, Takenaka J, Sugimoto Y, Takamatsu M, Kiuchi Y. Comparison of the prevalence of plateau iris configurations between angle-closure glaucoma and open-angle glaucoma using ultrasound biomicroscopy. J Glaucoma. 2011 Jun-Jul;20(5):315-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e3d2da.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20577108 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

[2016]102-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Advanced Glaucoma Progression Study
NCT01742819 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING