Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Study of LPI With Different Laser Wavelengths
NCT02901730
Laser Peripheral Iridotomy Plus Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty for Primary Angle Closure
NCT02613013
Laser Iridotomy Versus Surgical Iridectomy in Early Angle Closure
NCT01468103
Predicting the Effect of Laser Peripheral Iridotomy
NCT04495491
Testing YAG Laser Iridotomy for Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma
NCT07195370
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this study is to determine the optimum laser site of LPI. Before and 7days, 1 month, 3 months after LPI, the structure of anterior chamber, including angle anterior chamber depth(ACD), angle of anterior chamber (AA), anterior chamber angle opening distance 750(AOD750) are measured with ultrasound biomicroscopy. Before and 7days, 1 month, 3 months after LPI, the outflow resistance of aqueous humor are evaluated with C value. Before and 1hour, 1days, 3day, 7days, 1 month, 3 months after LPI, intraocular pressure are measured with Goldmann tonometry. Before and 3 months after LPI, retinal nerve layer thickness and the optic disc cup disc ratio are measure with optical coherence tomography.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
corneoscleral limbus group
Laser spot locates on the corneoscleral limbus.
Corneoscleral limbus group
Laser spot locates on the corneoscleral limbus
One spot group
Laser spot locates on one spot away from the corneoscleral limbus
one spot group
Laser spot locates on one spot away from the corneoscleral limbus
Two spots group
Laser spot locates on two spots away from the corneoscleral limbus
two spots group
Laser spot locates on two spots away from the corneoscleral limbus
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Corneoscleral limbus group
Laser spot locates on the corneoscleral limbus
one spot group
Laser spot locates on one spot away from the corneoscleral limbus
two spots group
Laser spot locates on two spots away from the corneoscleral limbus
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* PACS is diagnosed in eyes with an occludable angle but no other abnormality.
* PAC is diagnosed in eyes with an occludable angle, normal optic discs and visual fields and any of the following: raised IOP (\>19 mm Hg), PAS, pigment smearing in the superior angle, or sequelae of acute angle closure (iris whirling or glaucomatous fleck).
* PACG is diagnosed in eyes with an occludable angle and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Evidence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy is defined as a cup: disc ratio (CDR) of \>0.7 or \>0.2 CDR asymmetry.
* An occludable angle is defined as one in which three quarters of the posterior pigmented trabecular meshwork is not visible on viewing with a Goldmann two mirror lens in the primary position of gaze without indentation.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have systemic contraindications to medical therapy (including renal impairment, sulfur allergy, asthma and heart failure), pre-existing corneal opacities obstructing laser access to more than one quadrant of the peripheral iris and single-eyed patients are also excluded.
30 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maosong Xie
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maosong Xie, doctor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of ophthalmology, First Affilited Hospital of Fujian Medical University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lai J, Choy BN, Shum JW. Management of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2016 Jan-Feb;5(1):59-62. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000180.
Narayanaswamy A, Baskaran M, Perera SA, Nongpiur ME, Htoon HM, Tun TA, Wong TT, Goh D, Su DH, Chew PT, Ho CL, Aung T. Argon Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty for Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ophthalmology. 2016 Mar;123(3):514-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
Marchini G, Chemello F, Berzaghi D, Zampieri A. New findings in the diagnosis and treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Prog Brain Res. 2015;221:191-212. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
Sng CC, Aquino MC, Liao J, Zheng C, Ang M, Chew PT. Anterior segment morphology after acute primary angle closure treatment: a randomised study comparing iridoplasty and medical therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;100(4):542-8. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307087. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
Wright C, Tawfik MA, Waisbourd M, Katz LJ. Primary angle-closure glaucoma: an update. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 May;94(3):217-25. doi: 10.1111/aos.12784. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
Fu J, Qing GP, Wang NL, Wang HZ. Efficacy of laser peripheral iridoplasty and iridotomy on medically refractory patients with acute primary angle closure: a three year outcome. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Jan;126(1):41-5.
Lee JR, Choi JY, Kim YD, Choi J. Laser peripheral iridotomy with iridoplasty in primary angle closure suspect: anterior chamber analysis by pentacam. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;25(4):252-6. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.4.252. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
Mochizuki H, Takenaka J, Sugimoto Y, Takamatsu M, Kiuchi Y. Comparison of the prevalence of plateau iris configurations between angle-closure glaucoma and open-angle glaucoma using ultrasound biomicroscopy. J Glaucoma. 2011 Jun-Jul;20(5):315-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e3d2da.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
[2016]102-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.