Comparison Between Hemitrapeziectomy and Total Trapeziectomy With Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition in Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis II-III Eaton-Littler
NCT ID: NCT02693600
Last Updated: 2017-06-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-09-30
2017-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Investigators think that surgery with preservation of healthy joints (hemitrapeziectomy) in trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis without affecting sapho-trapezo-trapezoid joints, is better for scaphoid stability by preventing its collapse and thus preserving the stability of the carpus.
2. Objectives and Hypothesis:
Ligamentoplasty with partial trapeziectomy in grades II-III Eaton presents better results in the pollicis-lateral pinch (key pinch) strength than ligamentoplasty with total trapeziectomy.
Main Objective:
To demonstrate using the dynamometer that the postoperative key pinch strength higher using ligamentoplasty with partial trapeziectomy in grades II-III Eaton.
Secondary objectives:
To measure the collapse of the first column of thumb using calibrated radiographic analysis. Pain (E.V.A Scale). Range of motion (measured with goniometer). Quality of life (DISABILITIES OF THE ARM, SHOULDER AND HAND questionnaire).
3. Methodology:
It is a single-center randomized trial, parallel-group, in which two types of surgical techniques (TT - TP) will be compared. Patients will be randomized in this two techniques will be followed for one year, in routine clinical practice.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
LRTI vs Internal Brace for CMC OA
NCT03971188
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty With or Without Concomitant Latissimus and Teres Major Transfer for Shoulder Pseudoparalysis With Teres Minor Dysfunction
NCT01697865
Suture Fixation System Versus Tendonous Reconstruction in Carpometacarpal (CMC) Arthroplasty
NCT01121874
Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy for Subscapularis Repair
NCT02762903
Proximal Row Carpectomy vs Four-corner Fusion for Osteoarthritis of the Wrist
NCT04260165
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Partial Trapeziectomy (PT)
Patients with Osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint determined by the classification of Eaton-Littler (stages II-III) treated with with ligamentoplasty and partial trapeziectomy.
Ligamentoplasty with partial trapeziectomy
Total Trapeziectomy (TT)
Patients with Osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint determined by the classification of Eaton-Littler (stages II-III) treated with ligamentoplasty and total trapeziectomy.
Ligamentoplasty with total trapeziectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ligamentoplasty with partial trapeziectomy
Ligamentoplasty with total trapeziectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with huge affection of trapezium subchondral cysts and poor quality of trabecular bone.
* Cognitive impairment.
* Old fracture with impairment of the same extremity.
* Rheumatic active illness.
* Patients who withdraw their informed consent, or in case of impossibility of opinion by clinical status, whose legal guardians or close relatives to withdraw their informed consent to participate in the study.
* Patients who for any reason not related to the indication needed discontinue study participation or impossible to carry out assessments under more than two follow-up visits.
* Patients in whom it is considered that participation in the clinical study can be a prejudice, the physician responsible for patient care opinion.
45 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Corporacion Parc Tauli
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ferran Fillat Gomà
MD, MSc
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ricard Sánchez-Flo, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hospital Universitario Parc Taulí de Sabadell
Ferran Fillat-Gomà, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Universitario Parc Taulí de Sabadell
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitario Parc Taulí
Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CSPTCOT2014/01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.