Off-the-Shelf Splints Versus Occupational Therapy Splints for Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis
NCT ID: NCT01775670
Last Updated: 2017-05-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
4 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-02-28
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Post-op Rehabilitation's Influence on Tendon Healing & Clinical Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT00756015
LRTI vs Internal Brace for CMC OA
NCT03971188
Suture Fixation System Versus Tendonous Reconstruction in Carpometacarpal (CMC) Arthroplasty
NCT01121874
Effects of Kinesiotaping on Muscular Activity, Mobility, Strength and Pain After Rotator Cuff Surgery
NCT03379636
Effectiveness of Exercise Relative Motion Orthoses for Limited Finger Joint Motion
NCT06985459
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A hand-based thumb spica splint with the interphalangeal (IP) joint free is a specific nonoperative palliative treatment for TMC arthrosis. The goals of splint wear are improved comfort and function. The data regarding specific splint materials are limited, but suggest that shorter more flexible splints are preferred by patients and equally effective. Recently, the investigators looked into if there was a difference between thermoplast and neoprene hand-based thumb spica splints for treatment of TMC arthrosis. The neoprene splint was rated more comfortable than the thermoplast splint but otherwise there was no difference.
To the investigators' knowledge no studies have looked at the added value of occupational therapy in splint treatment for TMC arthrosis. The investigators believe that the time spent by occupational therapists (OTs) coaching patients on adaptive and palliative measures is valuable in addition to their technical skills but the investigators cannot draw any conclusions until the investigators research this in a prospective trial.
The investigators propose a two arm unblinded, randomized (1:1) controlled trial to evaluate if there is a difference between prefabricated off-the-shelf splints and splints provided by an OT with standard care coaching. The investigators want to determine if there is a difference in arm-specific disability, average pain, and satisfaction at an average of 2 months between splints provided by an OT and prefabricated off-the-shelf splints.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Off-the-Shelf Splint
Subjects in this arm will be managed with off-the-shelf splints for TMC arthrosis.
Off-the-shelf splint
Subjects will use an off-the-shelf splint
OT Splint
Subjects in this arm will be managed with a custom-made splint made by the Massachusetts General Hospital Occupational Therapists.
OT Splint
Subjects will use a splint custom-made by Massachusetts General Hospital Occupational Therapists.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Off-the-shelf splint
Subjects will use an off-the-shelf splint
OT Splint
Subjects will use a splint custom-made by Massachusetts General Hospital Occupational Therapists.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Clinical or radiological diagnosis of TMC arthrosis by MD
3. English fluency and literacy
Exclusion Criteria
2. Prior treatment of TMC arthrosis on same side with a splint during the last two months
3. Prior injury of the trapeziometacarpal joint
4. Rheumatoid arthritis
5. Pregnant women.
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David C. Ring, MD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David C Ring, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.