Humeral Shaft Pseudoarthrosis Treated With Bone Autograft Versus Platelet Rich Plasma

NCT ID: NCT02520089

Last Updated: 2018-07-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with humeral shaft pseudoarthrosis is going to be treated with a standard protocol with a locking compression plate and bone autograft, and other group of patients treated with platelet rich plasma.

Posteriorly all the patients it will evaluated radiographically and with functional scales for a period of one year.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pseudarthrosis is a condition characterized by the absence of union from 3-4 months of the start of a fracture. It usually has symptoms manifested by pain and loss of function of the affected extremity. In addition to radiographic data with lack of consolidation in the fracture. The surgical indications in patients with pseudoarthrosis data are the presence of pain and the mobility of the fracture taking account the time evolution.

The humeral shaft fracture represent 3% of the general fractures, appearing around 66,000 cases per year in the United States. The conservative treatment with a brace has been used since the 1970's. Mostly of the humeral shaft fractures are managed with this option. Contraindications are those fractures which are bilateral or in polytraumatized patients who do not have the ability to roam.

Surgical treatment seeks to provide a stable fixation providing an early mobilization. The union of these fractures occurs in a period ranging from 12 to 24 weeks. The use of a Locking Compression Plate where there must be at least six cortical fixation on both fragments is actually recommended, besides is necessary applies also bone autograft to promote ossification has osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive properties, with an radiographic union between the nineteen weeks.

The platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is obtained from a sample of autologous blood, and after processing it have growth factors that stimulate angiogenesis and cell proliferation. It has been used since 1990 to treat jaw fracture with bone autograft and tendon injury in rotator cuff with a good evolution. It has been bone consolidation from 8 to 24 weeks.

Preparation of platelet-rich plasma A 40-ml volume of whole blood was taken from the basilic or antecubital vein of the upper limb in sterile tubes and vacuum sealed with 3.8% sodium citrate as an anticoagulant. The samples were transported to the Tissue Engineering Laboratory of the Bone and Tissue Bank where they were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1800 rpm to separate the cellular parts corresponding to the erythrocytes and leukocytes. The upper plasma layer was removed from each of the tubes (taking care not to remove the buffy coat) and collected into a 50-ml sterile conical polypropylene tube for a second centrifugation step for 12 min at 3400 rpm. The plasma supernatant, or platelet poor plasma, was removed, leaving a volume of 3 ml in which the platelets were resuspended. The 3 ml of PRP obtained was transferred to a sterile glass tube and vacuum sealed without anticoagulant. An aliquot of the final PRP was sent to the laboratory to quantify the number of platelets. Manipulation of the samples was performed in a sterile environment within a class II biosafety cabinet. Prior to the administration of PRP to the patient, activation of the platelets was induced by adding 0.45 ml of 10% calcium gluconate and inverting the sample several times to ensure a homogeneous mixture. Then, the activated PRP was aspirated with a 5-ml syringe for application to the patient using the technique described above after asepsis and the application of 2 ml of lidocaine into the application site.

The patient must sign the format of informed consent to the authorization of the surgery and the use of platelet-rich plasma.

After signing informed consent, will divide the patients in two randomized groups to make the comparative and longitudinal study. A control group of patients who will receive treatment with surgery on the basis of open reduction with locking compression plate and autologous bone of iliac crest. The experimental group of patients will receive the above-mentioned treatment more the application of plasma rich platelets at the level of the fracture focus.

After the surgery all the patients will be assessed at outpatient at 10 days for evaluation, pendulum exercises and the first radiographic evaluation. The patient will be attending consultation to continue his post-surgical evolution. During the follow-up visits, the radiographic extent of the bony callus was assessed via anteroposterior and lateral radiograph of the arm as follows grade 0, no identifiable bony callus; grade 1, primary bony callus formation with little or no new periosteal bone; grade 2, new periosteal bone formation on two sides of the humerus,; and grade 3, new periosteal bone formation on three or four sides of the humerus. The follow-up is for one year.

Sample size calculation Using a formula to test hypothesis and two mean difference, with a value of zα of 1.96 with significance level of 95 for two tails, and a value zβ of 0.84 with an output of 80, a sample was obtained of 7 participants per group, whereas an average of 19 weeks for group control with a standard deviation of 3 hoping to reduce up to 4 weeks the start of consolidation with the application of PRP.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pseudoarthrosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bone autograft

The investigator it will obtain bone autograft of iliac crest ipsilateral of each patient. And apply into the pseudoarthrosis focus at the moment of the fixation with a locking compression plates.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

bone autograft of iliac crest

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The investigators will take bone autograft of iliac crest of the patient and then apply into the site of pseudoarthrosis, this graft have osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties

platelet rich plasma plus Bone autograft

Other group of patients it will be extracted 40 mL of peripheric blood sample, and processed with a double-centrifugation technique to obtain 5 mL of platelet rich plasma, and collocated into the focus of pseudoarthrosis after standard fixation with locking compression plates and Bone Autograft of Iliac Crest.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Platelet Rich Plasma plus bone autograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sample of 40 mL of peripheric blood and processed to obtain 5 mL of platelet rich plasma, and collocated into pseudoarthrosis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bone autograft of iliac crest

The investigators will take bone autograft of iliac crest of the patient and then apply into the site of pseudoarthrosis, this graft have osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Platelet Rich Plasma plus bone autograft

Sample of 40 mL of peripheric blood and processed to obtain 5 mL of platelet rich plasma, and collocated into pseudoarthrosis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Biomet GPS III MTF Cascade

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* evolution of 3 months
* initial orthopedic management
* without mental illness

Exclusion Criteria

* osteoporosis
* contralateral or ipsilateral fractures
* previous fracture in same place at least 3 month
* hematologic problems
* liver disease
* cardiac, renal or lung disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carlos A Acosta-Olivo

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carlos Acosta-Olivo, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Carroll EA, Schweppe M, Langfitt M, Miller AN, Halvorson JJ. Management of humeral shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Jul;20(7):423-33. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-07-423.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22751161 (View on PubMed)

Lin J, Hou SM, Hang YS. Treatment of humeral shaft delayed unions and nonunions with humeral locked nails. J Trauma. 2000 Apr;48(4):695-703. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200004000-00018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10780604 (View on PubMed)

Pugh DM, McKee MD. Advances in the management of humeral nonunion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003 Jan-Feb;11(1):48-59. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200301000-00007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12699371 (View on PubMed)

Celebi L, Dogan O, Muratli HH, Yagmurlu MF, Yuksel HY, Bicimoglu A. [Treatment of humeral pseudarthroses by open reduction and internal fixation]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2005;39(3):205-10. Turkish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16141726 (View on PubMed)

Khan SN, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;13(1):77-86.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15712985 (View on PubMed)

Ahmad Z, Howard D, Brooks RA, Wardale J, Henson FM, Getgood A, Rushton N. The role of platelet rich plasma in musculoskeletal science. JRSM Short Rep. 2012 Jun;3(6):40. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2011.011148. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22768374 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OR14-010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Glenohumeral Cortisone Injection
NCT04216017 COMPLETED PHASE2