Does Increasing Auditory Cueing Affect Gait Parameters in Children With Cerebral Palsy During a Functional Task?
NCT ID: NCT02666560
Last Updated: 2016-08-31
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
19 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2015-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Muscle Synergies During Gait in Children With Cerebral Palsy Undergoing Robot-assisted Gait Therapy
NCT06156969
Loading Gait in Spatic Cerebral Palsy
NCT02010736
Innovative Robotic Gait Trainer Use to Enable Walking in Children With Cerebral Palsy GMFCS III and IV
NCT05378243
The Effects of Electrical Stimulation Gait Training on Walking and Posture for Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT00292786
Evaluating Wearable Robotic Assistance on Gait
NCT04119063
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim: To explore if increasing auditory cueing frequency (AC20) affects gait during a functional task compared to auditory cueing at self-paced cadence (ACSC).
Method: Nineteen children with CP levels 1 and 2 on the Gross Motor Function Classification Scale participated using paired analysis. Outcomes were compared to the mean values for temporal spatial gait data within the conditions using a cross over design. TS data was obtained by using the GAITRite® walkway system whilst walking holding a cup.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Auditory cueing at self paced cadence
Participants performed a functional task with auditory cueing set at self paced cadence.
Auditory Cueing
Auditory cueing set at different frequency rates
Cueing at 20% above self paced cadence
Participants performed a functional task with auditory cueing set at 20% above self paced cadence whilst performing a functional task.
Auditory Cueing
Auditory cueing set at different frequency rates
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Auditory Cueing
Auditory cueing set at different frequency rates
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cognitive status average or above on the Weschler Intelligence Scale for children.
* Able to hear without the use of a hearing aid.
Exclusion Criteria
* Walking with assistance of a mobility aid.
* Cardiovascular problems or other associated health problems which limits the child waking multiple times over the GAITRite®.
5 Years
11 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Institute of Child Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Melissa Walk-ley
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University College, London
Ann Lyons, PHD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Northumberia University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Hanna SE, Palisano RJ, Russell DJ, Raina P, Wood E, Bartlett DJ, Galuppi BE. Prognosis for gross motor function in cerebral palsy: creation of motor development curves. JAMA. 2002 Sep 18;288(11):1357-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.11.1357.
Kwak, E. (2007) Effect of rhythmic auditory stimulation on controlling stepping cadence of individuals with mental retardation and cerebral palsy. International journal of special education, vol 27, no 3, pp. 1-8.
Kim SJ, Kwak EE, Park ES, Lee DS, Kim KJ, Song JE, Cho SR. Changes in gait patterns with rhythmic auditory stimulation in adults with cerebral palsy. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;29(3):233-41. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0698.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
141A22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.