Dual Joint Visual Feedback Gait Retraining in Pediatric Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
NCT ID: NCT05011201
Last Updated: 2022-01-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
8 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-19
2022-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biofeedback Gait Retraining for Stiff Knee Gait Correction
NCT05105763
Comparison of Inclined Backwalk vs Kneel Walk on Genurecurvatum in Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
NCT05770778
Does Increasing Auditory Cueing Affect Gait Parameters in Children With Cerebral Palsy During a Functional Task?
NCT02666560
a Comparison Between the Effectiveness of Vestibular and Dual Task on Balance in Diplegic Children
NCT05692336
Improving Gait and Balance in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy: Gait Myoelectric Stimulator Study
NCT03226860
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will recruit 8 pediatric participants with hemiplegic gait secondary to CP, in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Dual Joint Visual Feedback System (DJVF)
The DJVF system uses four inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors (MTW Devkit, Xsens Technologies BV, Enschede, Netherlands) which are placed on the pelvis, shank, thigh, and foot, to measure three-dimensional segment accelerations and orientations during gait. The software application has been developed by our study team using the MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA) programming language and the application programming interface supplied with the Xsens system. Sensor data is relayed back to a controlling PC for processing and feedback display formulation in real-time. The primary feedback is in the form of a cursor representing the position of the foot ahead of or behind the body. Relative foot position is calculated using the segmental angle and lengths of the paretic thigh and shank. The feedback is designed to reward a more anterior foot placement at the initial contact phase of gait by awarding points according to target screen zones that the cursor enters. The zone reached is highlighted and the instantaneous score is displayed.
FBC vs FBCS: addition of cumulative scoring:
Two feedback conditions representing two variants will be tested. The first (FBC) is as above, with only instantaneous scoring. The FBCS condition will be the same as the FBC condition with the following addition: game context cues of the cumulative score will be provided as visual numerical count displayed to the right of the main feedback interface.
Study Protocol
Researchers will place inertial sensors on the pelvis, thigh, shank, and shoe of the paretic limb, using elastic wraps and medical tape. Researchers will place surface EMG sensors on the participant's lower extremity paretic side. If any sensors cannot be placed due to the presence of orthotics or other complicating factors, data for that sensor will not be collected. Researchers will check the signal of each sensor, by having participants perform some easy activities such as flexing their knee, squatting, going on their toes, and raising their toes.
Following setup, participants will first walk on the study treadmill at a self-selected comfortable speed while baseline (BAS) gait patterns are recorded. After the baseline trial, practice, and orientation to the feedback, including the FBC and FBCS variants, will occur. The order of these training blocks will be randomized prior to participant arrival. Between training blocks, participants will be allotted rest periods to reduce fatigue.
Following testing, participants will complete a questionnaire with items on a five-point ordinal scale describing their 1) comprehension of the feedback display, 2) self-rating of success, 3) preference of which feedback variant (intervention) they preferred, and 4) effort or exhaustion following training.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental Group
Participants will undergo a single testing session of gait retraining using two variants of the dual joint visual feedback system (DJVF). The DJVF system uses IMU sensors to measure knee and hip joint motions and calculates the users foot position, relative to their pelvis. The relative foot position is represented in real time on a screen in front of the user with feedback designed to elicit increases in anteriorly located foot positions.
Dual Joint Visual Feedback without Scoring
Participants will walk on the treadmill while given instantaneous anterior and posterior foot position and immediate scoring information using the DJVF interface. A pediatric physical therapist will provide (1) verbal encouragement and redirection of attention to the task as needed (2) verbal cueing to assist if difficulty in interpreting the feedback and appropriate modification is noted.
Dual Joint Visual Feedback with Scoring
Participants will walk on the treadmill using the same DJFB with additional visual cumulative scoring on their performance. A pediatric physical therapist will provide (1) verbal encouragement and redirection of attention to the task as needed (2) verbal cueing to assist if difficulty in interpreting the feedback and appropriate modification is noted.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dual Joint Visual Feedback without Scoring
Participants will walk on the treadmill while given instantaneous anterior and posterior foot position and immediate scoring information using the DJVF interface. A pediatric physical therapist will provide (1) verbal encouragement and redirection of attention to the task as needed (2) verbal cueing to assist if difficulty in interpreting the feedback and appropriate modification is noted.
Dual Joint Visual Feedback with Scoring
Participants will walk on the treadmill using the same DJFB with additional visual cumulative scoring on their performance. A pediatric physical therapist will provide (1) verbal encouragement and redirection of attention to the task as needed (2) verbal cueing to assist if difficulty in interpreting the feedback and appropriate modification is noted.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* I2: Gait pattern in hemiplegic limb: deficit of knee extension during late swing phase/initial contact
* I3: Age 7 to 17 years
* I4: Able to walk on a treadmill without assistive devices
* I5: Able to understand spoken English at the level needed to:
1. understand and follow instructions for equipment setup, testing and task performance
2. answer questions related to effort and preference
3. be able to understand consent document and provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* E2: Known risk factor for stroke or heart attack while exercising
* E3: Lower extremity orthopaedic surgery less than 12 months prior to study start
* E4: Other significant health conditions that may interfere with the participant's ability to complete the study or could interfere with interpretation of the study results.
7 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Children's Specialized Hospital
OTHER
Kessler Foundation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter J Barrance, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kessler Foundation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kessler Foundation
West Orange, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R-1151-21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.