Investigation of the Effect of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy Applied to the Lower Extremity on Lower Extremity Functions in Individuals With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
NCT ID: NCT06753812
Last Updated: 2024-12-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-15
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The European Cerebral Palsy Monitoring Group has divided SP into 3 classes: spastic, dyskinetic and ataxic types. The spastic type is divided into 2 types: unilateral spastic type SP, where one half of the body is affected, and bilateral spastic type SP, where both halves of the body are affected. Individuals with unilateral SP have low muscle tone, and increased muscle tone and increased reflexes are seen in the later stages. Due to antagonist muscle weakness, there is inability to perform quality lower extremity movements and maintain balance.
In the rehabilitation of individuals with CP, many treatment concepts with high evidence levels are used, such as action observation therapy, bimanual intensive training, treadmill training with partial body weight, hippotherapy, and target-oriented training, which are frequently studied in the literature. Constraint induced movement therapy is also one of the treatment methods that has been frequently used in recent years and has been proven to have positive effects in children with CP. Constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) is a translational motor rehabilitation technique following CNS injury. The original concept involved restricting the unaffected extremity and forcing the affected extremity. Subsequent studies in humans included voluntary collective tasks or shaping practices with the affected extremity. As a result, CIMT has been reported to be effective in improving real-world arm use, motor function, and kinematic outcomes by causing changes in brain functions and structures. However, many changes have been made to the original protocol of CIMT over the years, including but not limited to the length of time for task practice, restriction, and the use of a transfer package.
CIMT has a very strong evidence base with studies. CIMT for the lower extremity is an intensive intervention method that has recently been reported with good results, based on a modification of the original CIMT for the upper extremity. The applicability of the protocol for the upper extremity may be due to the unilateral nature of the use of these extremities in most of our daily living activities. This may seem difficult for the lower extremities because humans are bipedal and this requires them to use both extremities simultaneously in daily living activities, especially walking. However, the positive results in the recovery of upper extremity motor function following CIMT and its contribution to improving the neurophysiological functions of the brain have convinced the neuroscience community to consider translating the technique to the lower extremities. CIMT also increases the expression of Growth-Associated Protein 43 (GAP 43) and the number of ΔFosB-positive cells, some of the biomarkers that play important roles in neural cell proliferation and neural and synaptic plasticity. Similarly, lower extremity movement is critical to brain health because decreased mobility results in decreased neural stem cell proliferation and altered cell turnover. Consequently, a lower extremity CIMT protocol is designed to include an intensive practice protocol with the predominantly affected extremity, shaping activities, transfer wrapping, and encouragement of increased use of the affected extremity. So far, there are several studies investigating the effects of lower extremity CIMT on walking parameters, balance, and motor function using different study designs, such as case reports, experimental studies, quasi-experimental studies, and randomized controlled trials. These studies reported that lower extremity CIMT improved walking speed, step length, motor function, functional mobility, balance, and kinematic outcomes.
Lower extremity constraint induced movement therapy has been applied to individuals with multiple sclerosis, stroke, subacute and chronic hemiparesis in recent years and positive results have been reported. However, there is no study in the literature regarding the application of this treatment method to the pediatric population. In order to address this gap in the literature, we planned to conduct this study to examine the possible effects of lower extremity constraint induced movement therapy on lower extremity functions, balance and gait parameters in individuals with cerebral palsy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Constraint induced movement therapy group
Children in this group will receive constraint induced movement therapy in addition to conventional physical therapy twice a week.
constraint induced movement therapy
Children in this group will receive constraint induced movement therapy for 10 sessions over 2 weeks, each session lasting 90 minutes, in addition to the treatment they receive 2 days a week at the special education and rehabilitation centers they attend.
Control group
Children in this group will continue to receive their treatment twice a week at the special education and rehabilitation center where they are currently registered and attending.
Control (Standard treatment)
Children in this group will continue to receive their treatment at the special education and rehabilitation center they attend, two days a week for 40 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
constraint induced movement therapy
Children in this group will receive constraint induced movement therapy for 10 sessions over 2 weeks, each session lasting 90 minutes, in addition to the treatment they receive 2 days a week at the special education and rehabilitation centers they attend.
Control (Standard treatment)
Children in this group will continue to receive their treatment at the special education and rehabilitation center they attend, two days a week for 40 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having been classified as Unilateral Cerebral Palsy according to SCPE.
* Being between the ages of 5-15,
* Being at levels I-II according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System
* Being at levels I-II according to the Communication Function Classification System
* Being able to stand up from sitting independently, even with the help of the upper extremity
* Being able to walk at least 10 m with or without an assistive device
Exclusion Criteria
* Children who have had lower extremity Botox injections within the last six months
* Those with rigid contractures involving lower extremity joints,
* Children with levels III-IV according to the Communication Functions Classification System
* Families and children who do not accept full participation in treatment
5 Years
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Abant Izzet Baysal University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ayşe Neriman NARİN
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Health Sciences
Bolu, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AIBU-FTR-ANN-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id