Case Series_Targeted Training for Trunk Control Cerebral Palsy

NCT ID: NCT02246751

Last Updated: 2020-09-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-30

Study Completion Date

2020-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Little is known about how children with cerebral palsy (CP) use their sensory systems (touch, sense of body position, balance organs in the inner ear, vision) to help them achieve trunk control for independent sitting. If a child with CP does not achieve trunk control by 4 years of age their prognosis for motor skill development including walking is poor. Clinical researchers at The Movement Centre in Oswestry, England have developed a method called Targeted Training in which children train trunk control in small segments from the top down using a custom fit training device. This study aims to examine how children with moderate to severe CP use sensory information for trunk control before, during and after a program of Targeted Training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

One of the major challenges of motor control is to understand how the central nervous system controls the degrees of freedom of the body. This is particularly evident in cerebral palsy (CP), which is the most prevalent chronic childhood motor disability and is one of the most disabling and costly chronic disorders of children and adults. Deficits in postural control and sensorimotor integration are hallmarks of CP. Although postural control of the trunk for independent sitting creates the foundation for all other motor tasks, surprisingly little is known about how children with CP use sensory input to guide their development of upright control (which occurs in typically developing infants by 8 months of age). This lack of knowledge limits our ability to effectively assess and treat children with neuromotor deficits in trunk control.

The objectives of this project are to identify sensory reliance and sensory re-weighting in a study of children with moderate-to-severe CP (4-12 years of age) before and after Targeted Training for Trunk Control. A novel trunk support device will enable testing of participants who lack (or are still developing) stable sitting. In experiments, kinematics of the head and trunk will be measured. Sensory reliance and re-weighting will be identified from postural trunk responses to sensory conflict stimuli consisting of tilts of a visual surround and/or tilts of a surface which participants sit upon. Generally, participants with a high reliance on vestibular feedback will remain upright with respect to gravity during all tests; whereas a high reliance on cutaneous or visual feedback will produce trunk sway away from upright and toward the surface or visual surround tilt, respectively. To tease apart biomechanical, physical, and neurological contributions to trunk sway, sensorimotor integration modeling will be used to complement data interpretation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cerebral Palsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single subject design case series

Targeted Training for trunk control, 5-6 days a week for 9 months, minimum of 20 minutes per day.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Targeted Training for trunk control

Intervention Type DEVICE

Orthotics Research and Locomotor Research Unit (ORLAU) standers will be custom fit to help the child train at the segmental level of the trunk where they begin to lose control of posture. The typical course of treatment involves loaning the customized equipment to each family for use in their home or in their child's educational setting. Training occurs once daily usually for 30-45 minutes. This is done 5 or 6 days per week. Training programs typically involve playing with balls or balloons or video games that motivate the child to hold the head erect and to wave the arms and hands and move the upper body. The researchers evaluate children every 8 weeks and adjust the stander to lower levels of support as the child gains control.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Targeted Training for trunk control

Orthotics Research and Locomotor Research Unit (ORLAU) standers will be custom fit to help the child train at the segmental level of the trunk where they begin to lose control of posture. The typical course of treatment involves loaning the customized equipment to each family for use in their home or in their child's educational setting. Training occurs once daily usually for 30-45 minutes. This is done 5 or 6 days per week. Training programs typically involve playing with balls or balloons or video games that motivate the child to hold the head erect and to wave the arms and hands and move the upper body. The researchers evaluate children every 8 weeks and adjust the stander to lower levels of support as the child gains control.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Segmental training for trunk control

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* cerebral palsy
* age 2-12 years
* Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Level III, IV or V

Exclusion Criteria

* spinal fixation
* fixed scoliosis
* uncontrolled seizures
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Hartford

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sandra Saavedra, MS, PT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Hartford

Adam Goodworth, MS, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Hartford

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pediatric Balance Laboratory; University of Hartford;

West Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Goodworth AD, Peterka RJ. Sensorimotor integration for multisegmental frontal plane balance control in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(1):12-28. doi: 10.1152/jn.00670.2010. Epub 2011 Sep 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21940611 (View on PubMed)

Goodworth AD, Peterka RJ. Contribution of sensorimotor integration to spinal stabilization in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jul;102(1):496-512. doi: 10.1152/jn.00118.2009. Epub 2009 Apr 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19403751 (View on PubMed)

Saavedra SL, van Donkelaar P, Woollacott MH. Learning about gravity: segmental assessment of upright control as infants develop independent sitting. J Neurophysiol. 2012 Oct;108(8):2215-29. doi: 10.1152/jn.01193.2011. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22832568 (View on PubMed)

Butler PB, Saavedra S, Sofranac M, Jarvis SE, Woollacott MH. Refinement, reliability, and validity of the segmental assessment of trunk control. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010 Fall;22(3):246-57. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181e69490.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20699770 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CP_TT_2014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.