Case Series_Targeted Training for Trunk Control Cerebral Palsy
NCT ID: NCT02246751
Last Updated: 2020-09-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-09-30
2020-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Targeted Training for Trunk Control_case Series Cerebral Palsy
NCT02097836
Assessment of Trunk Position Sense, Trunk Control, and Functional Independence in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT07347483
Physical, Functional and Neural Effects of Two Lower Extremity Exercise Protocols in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT01086670
Trunk Activity Rehabilitation in Young Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT06438432
Mobility Training to Improve Motor Behavior in Toddlers With or at Risk for Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study
NCT01253083
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objectives of this project are to identify sensory reliance and sensory re-weighting in a study of children with moderate-to-severe CP (4-12 years of age) before and after Targeted Training for Trunk Control. A novel trunk support device will enable testing of participants who lack (or are still developing) stable sitting. In experiments, kinematics of the head and trunk will be measured. Sensory reliance and re-weighting will be identified from postural trunk responses to sensory conflict stimuli consisting of tilts of a visual surround and/or tilts of a surface which participants sit upon. Generally, participants with a high reliance on vestibular feedback will remain upright with respect to gravity during all tests; whereas a high reliance on cutaneous or visual feedback will produce trunk sway away from upright and toward the surface or visual surround tilt, respectively. To tease apart biomechanical, physical, and neurological contributions to trunk sway, sensorimotor integration modeling will be used to complement data interpretation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single subject design case series
Targeted Training for trunk control, 5-6 days a week for 9 months, minimum of 20 minutes per day.
Targeted Training for trunk control
Orthotics Research and Locomotor Research Unit (ORLAU) standers will be custom fit to help the child train at the segmental level of the trunk where they begin to lose control of posture. The typical course of treatment involves loaning the customized equipment to each family for use in their home or in their child's educational setting. Training occurs once daily usually for 30-45 minutes. This is done 5 or 6 days per week. Training programs typically involve playing with balls or balloons or video games that motivate the child to hold the head erect and to wave the arms and hands and move the upper body. The researchers evaluate children every 8 weeks and adjust the stander to lower levels of support as the child gains control.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Targeted Training for trunk control
Orthotics Research and Locomotor Research Unit (ORLAU) standers will be custom fit to help the child train at the segmental level of the trunk where they begin to lose control of posture. The typical course of treatment involves loaning the customized equipment to each family for use in their home or in their child's educational setting. Training occurs once daily usually for 30-45 minutes. This is done 5 or 6 days per week. Training programs typically involve playing with balls or balloons or video games that motivate the child to hold the head erect and to wave the arms and hands and move the upper body. The researchers evaluate children every 8 weeks and adjust the stander to lower levels of support as the child gains control.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age 2-12 years
* Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Level III, IV or V
Exclusion Criteria
* fixed scoliosis
* uncontrolled seizures
2 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Hartford
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sandra Saavedra, MS, PT, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Hartford
Adam Goodworth, MS, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Hartford
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pediatric Balance Laboratory; University of Hartford;
West Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Goodworth AD, Peterka RJ. Sensorimotor integration for multisegmental frontal plane balance control in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(1):12-28. doi: 10.1152/jn.00670.2010. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
Goodworth AD, Peterka RJ. Contribution of sensorimotor integration to spinal stabilization in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jul;102(1):496-512. doi: 10.1152/jn.00118.2009. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
Saavedra SL, van Donkelaar P, Woollacott MH. Learning about gravity: segmental assessment of upright control as infants develop independent sitting. J Neurophysiol. 2012 Oct;108(8):2215-29. doi: 10.1152/jn.01193.2011. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
Butler PB, Saavedra S, Sofranac M, Jarvis SE, Woollacott MH. Refinement, reliability, and validity of the segmental assessment of trunk control. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010 Fall;22(3):246-57. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181e69490.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CP_TT_2014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.