3D Radiographic Evaluation of a Novel Implant Site Development Technique

NCT ID: NCT02660697

Last Updated: 2016-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-12-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present retrospective study aims at assessing the clinical effects of a novel implant site development (Extraction site development - XSD) technique after tooth extraction compared with extraction alone in patients requiring dental implant placement following healing of extraction sockets.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In advanced (Extraction Defect Sounding Class 3-4) alveolar defects, a minimally invasive tunnelised socket preservation technique utilising long term resorbable membranes and connective tissue grafting was used for extraction site development (XSD). The novel technique was evaluated in a retrospective comparative case series study including a total of 54 extraction sites. In the test group, out of 33 single rooted teeth, 29 in the maxilla and 4 in the mandible were removed, extractions sites were treated by the XSD method. Out of 33 teeth, 27 were incisors, 2 canines and 4 premolars. In the control group, out of 21 single rooted teeth, 11 in the maxilla and 10 in the mandible were extracted and left for spontaneous healing. Out of 21 teeth, 13 were incisors, 2 canines and 6 premolars. CBCT scans were taken prior to tooth extraction and 6-9 months later in both groups. Radiographic evaluation was carried out using the I-CAT Vision (Imaging Sciences International, LLC; Hatfield, USA) and ImageJ (National Institutes of Health) softwares. Following manual alignment of CBCTs vertical and horizontal linear measurements as well as planimetric measurements of cross-section areas were performed in pre- and postoperative data sets at the extraction sites.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tooth Extraction Status Nos Edentulous Alveolar Ridge

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Test - Extraction site development group

In the test group 29 healthy patients presenting 33 single rooted teeth scheduled for extraction with Extraction Defect Sounding (EDS) Class 3-4 type buccal bony dehiscences were included. 29 maxillary single rooted teeth and 4 single rooted teeth in the mandible (27 incisors, 2 canines and 4 premolars) were removed and treated by the novel extraction site development method. Pre- and postoperative ConeBeam Computer Tomography (CBCT) data were collected for further analysis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Extraction site development

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the test group, extraction sockets presenting EDS Type 3-4 buccal bony dehiscences were treated by a novel minimally invasive tunnelised modified GBR approach (XSD).

Control - Spontaneous healing group

In the control group. pre- and postextraction CBCT data sets of 14 patients with 21 extracted teeth were collected. 11 maxillary single rooted teeth and 10 single rooted teeth in the mandible (13 incisors, 2 canines and 6 premolars) were extracted and left for spontaneous healing.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Extraction site development

In the test group, extraction sockets presenting EDS Type 3-4 buccal bony dehiscences were treated by a novel minimally invasive tunnelised modified GBR approach (XSD).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

XSD

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Presence of at least 1 single rooted tooth scheduled for extraction with EDS Class 3-4 type buccal bony dehiscence
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Semmelweis University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Balint Molnar

Dr. Balint Molnar DMD, PhD, assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Balint Molnar, DMD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Semmelweis University Department of Periodontology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Semmelweis University Department of Periodontology

Budapest, Budapest, Hungary

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hungary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

XSD-Semmelweis-Perio

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.