Radiographic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Xenograft as a Socket Preservation Material in Maxillary Posterior Teeth.

NCT ID: NCT07250256

Last Updated: 2025-11-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-08-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Radiographic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Xenograft as a Socket Preservation Material in Maxillary Posterior Teeth: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Study

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The process of natural healing starts with new bone formation taking place from initial islands of bone within the connective tissue occurring after a 4 to 8 weeks interval from extraction date. This is followed by the manifestation of a mature trabecular structure that can be noticed at 10 to 20 weeks after extraction accompanied with a reduction in osteoblast count. As a result of the extensive bone resorption post extraction, the prosthetically driven implant placement is compromised and in need of some ridge preservation techniques that have been widely studied to try and ensure less alveolar bone loss. The aim of this research is to study the S1-XB Xenograft containing hydrogel and to evaluate its effects on extraction socket healing in comparison to natural socket healing. This is an In-Vivo comparative randomized controlled study that will be conducted on patients of the outpatient clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial department Suez Canal University to evaluate the difference between using S1-XB bone graft as a socket preservation material and normal socket healing without adding any socket preservation materials.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Socket Preservation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is an In-Vivo comparative randomized controlled study that will be conducted on patients of the outpatient clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial department Suez Canal University to evaluate the difference between using S1-XB bone graft as a socket preservation material and normal socket healing without adding any socket preservation materials.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

(8 cases): was not exposed to any type of socket preservation after the extraction procedure.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Control (Standard treatment)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Atraumatic extraction and sockets were allowed to undergo normal healing without any graft materials

Study group

(8 cases): was treated by immediate socket preservation with S1-XB xenograft augmentation after extraction.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

S1-XB

Intervention Type DEVICE

Socket grafted with xenograft containing alginate hydrogel material

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

S1-XB

Socket grafted with xenograft containing alginate hydrogel material

Intervention Type DEVICE

Control (Standard treatment)

Atraumatic extraction and sockets were allowed to undergo normal healing without any graft materials

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male patients aged between 21 and 40 years.
* General good health.
* Absence of any relevant systemic disease.
* Presence of a hopeless maxillary posterior tooth that requires extraction.
* Extraction site suitable for replacement by a dental implant.
* Cases have adequate bone width and length.
* Volunteer subjects must sign an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Poor oral hygiene with no possibility of improvement.
* Smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day).
* Chronic treatment with any medication known to affect oral status and bone turnover.
* Drug or alcohol abuse.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Suez Canal University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Suez Canal university

Ismailia, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

547-2022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.