Buccal Bone Resorption in Immediate SLActive Implant Placement Thin vs. Thick Buccal Bone

NCT ID: NCT04731545

Last Updated: 2024-01-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-15

Study Completion Date

2022-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The utilization of SLActive implants which allow more rapid osseointgeration with 3 to 4 weeks. will be placed in thin buccal bone as immediate implants to determine the resorption compared to thick buccal bone

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

With the increased demand for aesthetics and the expectation of immediate tooth replacement, improving the treatment options in case with hopeless teeth in the esthetic zone by immediate implants is a need by both practitioners and patients.

Current guidelines, today, restricting such treatment to only thick (+ or = 1mm) buccal bone plates. However, the literature shows that less than 10% of the community have such criteria, making it a high risk but needed procedure.

Soft tissue and bone remodelling after extraction is an inescapable fact. Immediate implant placement cannot prevent soft tissue and bone remodeling around implants (Araújo et al. 2005, Chen et al. 2009), but implant surface treatment and modifications might enhance the maintainability of the supporting structures around the dental implant due to its faster integration, better stimulating the vascular components at the site. This could be tested by the crestal and buccal bone changes, pink esthetic score and ostell readings.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Implant Immediate Implant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

thin buccal bone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

immediate implant placement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Minimally traumatic tooth extraction, immediate implant placement and hard tissue grafting. loading after 3 months.

thick buccal bone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

immediate implant placement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Minimally traumatic tooth extraction, immediate implant placement and hard tissue grafting. loading after 3 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

immediate implant placement

Minimally traumatic tooth extraction, immediate implant placement and hard tissue grafting. loading after 3 months.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Single bounded irrestorable tooth in the esthetic zone that needs to be extracted.
2. Healthy systemic condition.
3. Type I socket with a minimum of 1mm of buccal bone thickness prior to extraction. (Morton et al., 2014)
4. Sufficient bone apical to the socket for implant primary stability. (Morton et al., 2014)
5. Good oral hygiene.
6. Patient accepts a minimum of three-year follow-up period (cooperative patients).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Signs of acute infection related to the area of interest.
2. Patients with parafunctional habits (Lobbezoo et al. 2006 and Roelhing et al. 2016).
3. Smokers (Lambert et al. 2000).
4. Pregnant females.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut Straumann AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hani Elnahass

Assitant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Cairo University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

ElNahass H, Tawfik OK, Naiem SN, Zazou N, Moussa M. Evaluation of buccal bone resorption in immediate implant placement in thin versus thick buccal bone plates: An 18-month follow-up prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Jun;26(3):532-544. doi: 10.1111/cid.13312. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38380779 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

333

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.