Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-31
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Autologous Cartilage Implantation vs Arthroscopic Debridement
NCT02636881
Results at 10 to 14 Years After Microfracture in the Knee
NCT01747681
Microfracture Versus Adipose Derived Stem Cells for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects
NCT02090140
Arthroscopic Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Microfractures
NCT01947374
This is a Study to Evaluate Nanofractures Technique in the Treatment of Cartilage Lesions
NCT05660161
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Clinical compare the effect of arthroscopic microfracture (MF) with arthroscopic debridement (AD) in patients with symptomatic full thickness knee cartilage injuries less than 2cm2.
Focal cartilage injuries in the knee might have devastating effect both in the short term and in the long term. Various surgical treatment options are available, with microfracture the most used technique globally. Meta-analysis and systematic reviews have required well-designed, long-term, multicenter studies to evaluate clinical outcomes of microfracture with the use of a "no treatment" group as a control group.
H0: There is no difference in KOOS QoL after AM or AD 24 months after surgery. H1: There is a difference in KOOS QoL after AM or AD 24 months after surgery.
Questionnaires: KOOS, Tegner score, Lysholm score, EQ-5D, VAS. Physical examination: range of motion and hop test. Radiology: x-ray and MRI of the knee.
Primary aim: KOOS quality of life (QoL) subscore.
Prospective, double-blinded parallel-group multicenter study with 2 treatment arms. Approx. 24 months inclusion and 24 months follow up. In total 4 years.
All will be invited to participate in late controls after 5 and 10 years.
6 Norwegian hospitals: Akershus University Hospital, Oslo University Hospital - Ullevaal, Kristiansund Hospital, Aalesund Hospital, Diakonhjemmet Hospital and Haukeland University Hospital.
114 patients Inclusion: age 18-50 years old, single symptomatic cartilage defect on femoral condyle or trochlea.
2 treatment groups with 57 patients in each group. Follow up after 3 months (± 2 weeks), 6 months (± 4 weeks), 12 months (± 6 weeks) and 24 months (± 8 weeks). All will be invited to participate in late controls after 5 and 10 years. If any unforeseen complication outside normal clinical practice occurs, the sponsor representative will be contacted as soon as possible with a parallel message to the local coordinators at the involved hospitals. During each follow up, there will be a case report form (CRF) regarding complications and safety.
A 5 mL venous blood sample will be drawn on the day of operation. The blood sample will be centrifuged before serum is pipetted in a sterile tube. The serum will be analyzed at Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet on the cartilage biomarker microRNA-140 (miR-140).
If normal distribution, aims will be analyzed using linear mixed models (LMM), and the primary aim will be performed as a post hoc test for the LMM, similar to performing a two-sample t-test. If no normal distribution, analysis will be performed using Mann-Whitney U-test.
Detecting a difference of 10 with 80 percent Power, uing a standard deviation of 18, this yields 52 patients in each group. By adding 10% due to loss during follow-up, we therefore plan to include a total of 114 patients.
No interim analysis will be done. Monitor from Health Møre and Romsdal HF. The end of this study is 24 months after the last included patient.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arthroscopic microfracture (MF)
The AM group will be subjected to a diagnostic arthroscopy with a full inspection of the knee joint to ensure the inclusion criteria are fulfilled. The cartilage is cut sharp forming a rim of 90 degrees. The calcified layer is removed using a curette before an arthroscopic awl is then used to perform multiple holes ("microfractures") from the periphery towards the center. The microfractures are 3 - 4 mm apart and 2 - 4 mm deep into the subchondral bone. The correct and successful technique is confirmed by direct visualization: while reducing the fluid pump pressure, the release of marrow fat droplets and blood will be observed.
Arthroscopic microfracture (MF)
Arthroscopy With microfracture procedure
Arthroscopic debridement (AD)
The AD group will be subjected to a diagnostic arthroscopy with a full inspection of the knee joint to ensure the inclusion criteria are fulfilled. The lesion is stabilized, debriding all loose or marginally attached cartilage from the surrounding rim to form a stable edge of healthy cartilage around the defect using a ring curette, where cartilage slops down to the defect.
Arthroscopic debridement (AD)
Arthroscopy With debridement procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Arthroscopic microfracture (MF)
Arthroscopy With microfracture procedure
Arthroscopic debridement (AD)
Arthroscopy With debridement procedure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cartilage lesion ICRS grade 3 or 4
* More than 50 % of the menisci intact
* Ligamentous stable knee
* Lysholm Score \< 75
* Acceptable range of motion (5-105 degrees)
Exclusion Criteria
* Malalignment \> 5 degrees measured clinically, and if uncertainty on HKA radiographs
* Systemic arthritis
* Previous cartilage surgery except OCD fixation
* Obesity BMI \> 30
* Serious drig or alcohol abuse
* Inability to answer questionnaires or partake in rehabilitation
* Comorbidity that may influence surgery or rehabilitation
* Pregnancy
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kristiansund Hospital
OTHER
Alesund Hospital
OTHER
Haukeland University Hospital
OTHER
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
OTHER
Oslo University Hospital
OTHER
Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital
OTHER
University Hospital, Akershus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Asbjorn Aroen
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tommy F Aae, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National coordinator
Øystein Lian, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Kristian sund sykehus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Akershus University Hospital
Lørenskog, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Banitalebi H, Owesen C, Aroen A, Tran HT, Myklebust TA, Randsborg PH. Is T2 mapping reliable in evaluation of native and repair cartilage tissue of the knee? J Exp Orthop. 2021 Apr 28;8(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00350-1.
Aae TF, Randsborg PH, Breen AB, Visnes H, Vindfeld S, Sivertsen EA, Loken S, Brinchmann J, Hanvold HA, Aroen A. Norwegican Cartilage Project - a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic microfracture with arthroscopic debridement in focal cartilage defects in the knee. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 16;17:292. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1156-y.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015/2202
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.