Norwegian Cartilage Project - Microfracture

NCT ID: NCT02637505

Last Updated: 2025-01-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

114 patients between 18 and 50 years with an isolated focal cartilage defect in the knee will be randomized to either receive arthroscopic microfracture or arthroscopic debridement. Both groups will then undergo a systematic physiotherapy training regime for 6-9 months. The groups will then be compared for results, after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, by using validated patient reported outcome scores (Lysholm, KOOS, Tegner) and EQ5D as well as clinical examination and radiological findings at 2 years (MRI).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Focal cartilage defects in the knee - A randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic microfracture with arthroscopic debridement.

Clinical compare the effect of arthroscopic microfracture (MF) with arthroscopic debridement (AD) in patients with symptomatic full thickness knee cartilage injuries less than 2cm2.

Focal cartilage injuries in the knee might have devastating effect both in the short term and in the long term. Various surgical treatment options are available, with microfracture the most used technique globally. Meta-analysis and systematic reviews have required well-designed, long-term, multicenter studies to evaluate clinical outcomes of microfracture with the use of a "no treatment" group as a control group.

H0: There is no difference in KOOS QoL after AM or AD 24 months after surgery. H1: There is a difference in KOOS QoL after AM or AD 24 months after surgery.

Questionnaires: KOOS, Tegner score, Lysholm score, EQ-5D, VAS. Physical examination: range of motion and hop test. Radiology: x-ray and MRI of the knee.

Primary aim: KOOS quality of life (QoL) subscore.

Prospective, double-blinded parallel-group multicenter study with 2 treatment arms. Approx. 24 months inclusion and 24 months follow up. In total 4 years.

All will be invited to participate in late controls after 5 and 10 years.

6 Norwegian hospitals: Akershus University Hospital, Oslo University Hospital - Ullevaal, Kristiansund Hospital, Aalesund Hospital, Diakonhjemmet Hospital and Haukeland University Hospital.

114 patients Inclusion: age 18-50 years old, single symptomatic cartilage defect on femoral condyle or trochlea.

2 treatment groups with 57 patients in each group. Follow up after 3 months (± 2 weeks), 6 months (± 4 weeks), 12 months (± 6 weeks) and 24 months (± 8 weeks). All will be invited to participate in late controls after 5 and 10 years. If any unforeseen complication outside normal clinical practice occurs, the sponsor representative will be contacted as soon as possible with a parallel message to the local coordinators at the involved hospitals. During each follow up, there will be a case report form (CRF) regarding complications and safety.

A 5 mL venous blood sample will be drawn on the day of operation. The blood sample will be centrifuged before serum is pipetted in a sterile tube. The serum will be analyzed at Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet on the cartilage biomarker microRNA-140 (miR-140).

If normal distribution, aims will be analyzed using linear mixed models (LMM), and the primary aim will be performed as a post hoc test for the LMM, similar to performing a two-sample t-test. If no normal distribution, analysis will be performed using Mann-Whitney U-test.

Detecting a difference of 10 with 80 percent Power, uing a standard deviation of 18, this yields 52 patients in each group. By adding 10% due to loss during follow-up, we therefore plan to include a total of 114 patients.

No interim analysis will be done. Monitor from Health Møre and Romsdal HF. The end of this study is 24 months after the last included patient.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Injury Cartilage Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arthroscopic microfracture (MF)

The AM group will be subjected to a diagnostic arthroscopy with a full inspection of the knee joint to ensure the inclusion criteria are fulfilled. The cartilage is cut sharp forming a rim of 90 degrees. The calcified layer is removed using a curette before an arthroscopic awl is then used to perform multiple holes ("microfractures") from the periphery towards the center. The microfractures are 3 - 4 mm apart and 2 - 4 mm deep into the subchondral bone. The correct and successful technique is confirmed by direct visualization: while reducing the fluid pump pressure, the release of marrow fat droplets and blood will be observed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Arthroscopic microfracture (MF)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Arthroscopy With microfracture procedure

Arthroscopic debridement (AD)

The AD group will be subjected to a diagnostic arthroscopy with a full inspection of the knee joint to ensure the inclusion criteria are fulfilled. The lesion is stabilized, debriding all loose or marginally attached cartilage from the surrounding rim to form a stable edge of healthy cartilage around the defect using a ring curette, where cartilage slops down to the defect.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Arthroscopic debridement (AD)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Arthroscopy With debridement procedure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Arthroscopic microfracture (MF)

Arthroscopy With microfracture procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Arthroscopic debridement (AD)

Arthroscopy With debridement procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Single symptomatic lesion of the trochlea, medial or lateral femoral condyle of the knee less than 2 cm2
* Cartilage lesion ICRS grade 3 or 4
* More than 50 % of the menisci intact
* Ligamentous stable knee
* Lysholm Score \< 75
* Acceptable range of motion (5-105 degrees)

Exclusion Criteria

* Osteoarthritis
* Malalignment \> 5 degrees measured clinically, and if uncertainty on HKA radiographs
* Systemic arthritis
* Previous cartilage surgery except OCD fixation
* Obesity BMI \> 30
* Serious drig or alcohol abuse
* Inability to answer questionnaires or partake in rehabilitation
* Comorbidity that may influence surgery or rehabilitation
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kristiansund Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alesund Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Haukeland University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Diakonhjemmet Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Akershus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Asbjorn Aroen

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tommy F Aae, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National coordinator

Øystein Lian, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Kristian sund sykehus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Akershus University Hospital

Lørenskog, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Banitalebi H, Owesen C, Aroen A, Tran HT, Myklebust TA, Randsborg PH. Is T2 mapping reliable in evaluation of native and repair cartilage tissue of the knee? J Exp Orthop. 2021 Apr 28;8(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00350-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33913035 (View on PubMed)

Aae TF, Randsborg PH, Breen AB, Visnes H, Vindfeld S, Sivertsen EA, Loken S, Brinchmann J, Hanvold HA, Aroen A. Norwegican Cartilage Project - a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic microfracture with arthroscopic debridement in focal cartilage defects in the knee. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 16;17:292. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1156-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27422025 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015/2202

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.