Long Term Outcomes of Osteochondral Allografts for Osteochondral Defects of the Knee
NCT ID: NCT02308358
Last Updated: 2023-08-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-05-31
2015-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Meniscal Allografts
NCT01059409
Second Line Treatment of Knee Osteochondral Lesion With Treated Osteochondral Graft
NCT02430558
Evaluating Cryopreserved Osteochondral Allograft Cores for the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions in the Knee
NCT06216756
A Biologic Joint Replacement Strategy to Treat Patients With Severe Knee Trauma and Post-Traumatic Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT03257371
Chondrofix Osteochondral Allograft Prospective Study
NCT01410136
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Normal joint cartilage is a firm, elastic tissue that covers the ends of bones to protect them and allow smooth, pain-free movement over each other. Joint cartilage is described, macroscopically and microscopically, as articular or "hyaline" cartilage. Hyaline cartilage is often described as a "glass-like" structural tissue because of its shiny appearance and translucency. The tissue structure is a hydrated matrix consisting of proteoglycans and at least 90% (dry weight) Type II collagen fibers. The collagen fibers contribute to the overall tensile strength and the proteoglycans provide the stiffness and tissue resiliency. Cartilage cells, or chondrocytes, produce dense matrix, which effectively incarcerate the cells themselves. In the event of injury, the motility of these cells is restricted due to their inclusion deep inside the matrix, and the avascularity of the cartilage itself. This lack of a vascular network prevents the infiltration of inflammatory cells and bioactive molecules following damage. Thus, once damaged, adult articular cartilage will not effectively heal or regenerate.
Treatment techniques of osteochondral lesions are relatively new and frequently changing and evolving. The treatment algorithms for these injuries are complex and often involve multiple procedures, including non-surgical interventions with pharmacological agents such as oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), injectable corticosteroids, and activity modification including rehabilitation and support braces that may provide incomplete or temporary relief. Lesion characteristics such as grade and thickness may also impact treatment options and recovery. Arthroscopic debridement and lavage is effective as a first-line surgical approach for subjects with low physical demands. This procedure eliminates debris and decreases inflammation in the joints, but the symptomatic relief is usually transient and the lesion is not repaired. Treatments providing long-term results may be achieved through a variety of surgical options.
There are many surgical treatments options currently available and each have limitations. Marrow stimulation techniques include microfracture, drilling, and abrasion arthroplasty. The Microfracture technique has been described to address lesions up to 1 cm2 while other authors cite more specific applications depending on lesion size, patient age and physical demands. While microfracture is considered a reparative treatment, the procedure can produce less than optimal results because of the inferior nature of fibrocartilaginous tissue formed. Unlike the Type II collagen normally found in articular cartilage, fibrocartilage consists predominately of Type I collagen. Because it lacks the long-term wear characteristics of normal hyaline cartilage, fibrocartilage can degrade with time.
ACI is a two-staged procedure developed to treat cartilage defects in the knee. For ACI, a primary arthroscopic procedure is performed to assess the defect and a small amount (200mg to 400 mg) of healthy, autologous cartilage is harvested. The tissue is then expanded using a cell-culture process over a period of several weeks. The expanded cells are then implanted into the area of the defect during a second surgical procedure. Studies have demonstrated through histology and quantitative measurements that ACI produces a "hyaline-like cartilage" with a collagen type II content of between 35 percent and 55 percent. Literature indicates that hyaline cartilage may have greater biomechanical strength and integrity than the fibrocartilaginous tissue generated in lesions treated with microfracture. There are several disadvantages using ACI, however, such as the need for two surgeries. It has increased surgical time due to and it is associated with substantial cost to account for ex vivo cell expansion. Potential postoperative complications related to the periosteal patch include cell leakage, hypertrophy and/or delamination, and unequal chondrocyte distribution within the lesion.
Osteochondral grafting, the direct transplantation of an osteochondral autograft or allograft, is the only technique available on the market that transplants intact hyaline cartilage. Fresh osteochondral allografts use active chondrocytes while avoiding donor site morbidity. The grafts are avascular and aneural, meaning they are immunopriveleged and suitable for transplantation. Autograft plugs are typically used to treat small defects (up to 2.5 cm in diameter) due to donor site size limitation. Osteochondral allografts can be harvested up to 35 mm in diameter or an entire compartment can be resurfaced using a shell technique.Clinical outcome of osteochondral autografts has been documented in various studies as good to excellent, particularly in subjects with isolated femoral lesions. A major benefit of osteochondral allografts is their ability to provide the surgeon with the capability to treat much larger defects. A major drawback of many of the aforementioned treatment options (microfracture, ACI, osteochondral autograft) is their inability to treat such large lesions. Additionally, fresh OCA longevity after implantation has been documented to be as long as 25 years, indicating that this procedure can provide long term relief to patients.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of patients receiving femoral condyle osteochondral allografts, to evaluate potential predisposing factors to failure of such grafts, and to compare the overall outcomes of the grafts to the current standard of care for smaller lesions, microfracture. Our hypothesis is that patients treated with these allografts will demonstrate significant functional improvement as measured by validated outcome scoring measures and their function will be at least equal to that of microfracture outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Allograft Transplantation
Subjects with femoral condyle osteochondral defects ≥10mm, as determined by MRI or diagnostic knee arthroscopy, will be recruited for allograft transplantation.
No interventions assigned to this group
Microfracture Treatment
Subjects with femoral condyle osteochondral defects \<10mm, as determined by MRI or diagnostic knee arthroscopy, will be recruited for microfracture treatment.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Femoral condyle osteochondral defect ≥10mm as determined by MRI or diagnostic knee arthroscopy for allograft transplantation, defect \<10mm for microfracture treatment
3. Must be physically and mentally willing and able to comply with postoperative and routinely scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations.
4. Must be able and willing to follow a standardized rehabilitation protocol.
5. Must be able to read and understand English or a language for which translated versions of the patient reported questionnaires and Informed consent form are available.
6. Must be able to sign informed consent and must voluntarily sign the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)-approved subject Informed Consent Form.
Exclusion Criteria
2\. Presence of severe soft tissue injuries around the knee that have required or may require skin grafting or flap coverage.
3\. Presence of a previous below knee amputation
4\. Presence of inflammatory systemic arthritis or disease involving the index joint (i.e. gout)
5\. Is a prisoner
6\. Is receiving workman's compensation
8\. Subject is mentally incompetent such that would preclude the subject from providing adequate consent and/or complying with study requirements
9\. Based on a clinical history, physical examination and/or subject presentation, subject has, or is suspected to have, a history of alcohol and/or drug abuse that would preclude subject from providing adequate consent and/or complying with study requirements
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Missouri-Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
James Stannard
Professor and Chairman - Orthopaedic Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James P Stannard, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Missouri Orthopaedic Institute
James L Cook, DVM
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Missouri Orthopaedic Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Missouri-Hospital and Clinics
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1210204
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.