Efficacy and Safety Study of co.Don Chondrosphere to Treat Cartilage Defects
NCT ID: NCT01222559
Last Updated: 2021-01-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-10-31
2020-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
After screening visit patients were booked for arthroscopy and at that time they were randomised to either ACT3D-CS with co.don chondrosphere® (Group A) or to MF(Group B), a marrow-stimulating method based on the penetration of the subchondral bone plate at the bottom of the cartilage defect. At the time of arthroscopy Patients of group B had their procedure of MF (treatment surgery) and patients of group A had their cells harvested from healthy cartilage. The cells are cultivated for 8-10 weeks in vitro to develope 3-dimensional spheroids , that are transplanted in an open knee procedure (treatment surgery)into the defect. Patients subsequently followed the same rehabilitation program and had post-surgery visits. After the 12-month-visit a interim analyses will be performed and the 24-month-visit is defined as final assessment. Then patients have follow-up assessments up to 60 months post-treatment-surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of 3 Different Doses of co.Don Chondrosphere to Treat Large Cartilage Defects
NCT01225575
Effects of CHONDRON (Autologous Chondrocytes) With Ankle Cartilage Defect
NCT01050816
The Post-marketing Surveillance to Evaluate the Efficacy of CHONDRON (Autologous Cultured Chondrocyte) by Arthroscopy
NCT02539069
Efficacy and Safety of Chondron (Autologus Chondrocyte) in Patients With Cartilage Defects in Their Ankle
NCT02537067
the Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Chondron Compared With Mircrofracture of Knee
NCT02524509
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
co.don chondrosphere®
co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes. The dose depends on the size of the defect, recommended dose is 10-70 spheroids/cm2 defect.
co.don chondrosphere®
co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes. The dose depends on the size of the defect, recommended dose is 10-70 spheroids/cm2 defect.
Micofracture
A procedure in which the subchondral bone is perforated to allow a bloodcloth to form scar tissue.
co.don chondrosphere®
co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes. The dose depends on the size of the defect, recommended dose is 10-70 spheroids/cm2 defect.
Microfracture
A procedure in which the subchondral bone is perforated to allow a bloodcloth to form new tissue.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
co.don chondrosphere®
co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes. The dose depends on the size of the defect, recommended dose is 10-70 spheroids/cm2 defect.
Microfracture
A procedure in which the subchondral bone is perforated to allow a bloodcloth to form new tissue.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Defect: isolated ICRS grade III or IV single defect chondral lesions on femoral condyles
3. Defect size: 1 to \< 4 cm2 after debridement to healthy cartilage up to 6 mm in depth.Assessment with MRI at screening and per estimation during arthroscopy prior to randomization
4. Nearly intact chondral structure surrounding the defect as well as an intact corresponding joint area
5. Informed consent signed and dated by patient
6. Patient understands the strict rehabilitation protocol and follow-up programme and is willing to follow it
7. In case of pain, patient agrees to use only paracetamol mono- (max 4 g/day) or combination preparation and oral and/or topic NSAIDs during the trial and to discontinue the use of oral and/or topic NSAIDs and/or paracetamol combination preparation 1 week before each visit whereas the use of paracetamol monopreparation (max 4 g/day) is allowed. However, in the morning of the visit day, no pain medication is allowed. Other pain medications are allowed during surgical procedure and may be taken for a period not exceeding 4 weeks after surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Radiological signs of osteoarthritis
3. Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD)
4. Any signs of knee instability
5. Valgus or varus malalignment (more than 5° over the mechanical axis)
6. Clinically relevant second cartilage lesion on the same knee
7. More than 50 % resection of a meniscus in the affected knee or incomplete meniscal rim
8. Rheumatoid arthritis, parainfectious or infectious arthritis, and condition after these diseases
9. Pregnancy and planned pregnancy (no MRI possible)
10. Obesity (Body Mass Index \>30)
11. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
12. Serious illness
13. Poor general health as judged by physician
14. Participation in concurrent clinical trials or previous trials within 3 months of screening
15. Previous treatment with ACT in the affected knee
16. Microfracture performed less than 1 year before screening in the affected knee
17. Alcohol or drug (medication) abuse
18. Meniscal transplant in the affected knee
19. Meniscal suture (in the affected knee) three months prior to baseline
20. Mosaicplasty (Osteoarticular Transplant System, OATS) in the affected knee
21. Having received hyaluronic acid intra-articular injections in the affected knee within the last 3 months before baseline
22. Taking specific osteoarthritis drugs such as chondroïtin sulfate, diacerein, nglucosamine,piascledine, capsaicin within 2 weeks before baseline
23. Corticosteroid treatment by systemic or intraarticular route within the last month of baseline or intramuscular or oral corticosteroïds within the last 2 weeks before baseline
24. Chronic use of anticoagulants
25. Any concomitant painful or disabling disease of the spine, hips or lower limbs that would interfere with evaluation of the afflicted knee
26. Any clinically significant or symptomatic vascular or neurological disorder of the lower extremities
27. Any evidence of the following diseases in the affected knee: septic arthritis, inflammatory joint disease, recurrent episodes of pseudogout, Paget's disease of bone, ochronosis, acromegaly, haemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, primary osteochondromatosis, heritable disorders, collagen gene mutation
28. Current diagnosis of osteomyelitis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1,-2) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
co.don AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefan Fickert, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitätsklinikum der Albert-Ludwig-Universität Freiburg, Department Othopädie und Traumatologie
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Würrtemberg, Germany
Waldkrankenhaus "Rudolf Elle" GmbH Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Eisenberg, Tühringen, Germany
Gelenk-und Wirbelsäulenzentrum Steglitz
Berlin, , Germany
DRK-Kliniken Westend
Berlin, , Germany
St. Vinzenz-Hospital
Dinslaken, , Germany
Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, , Germany
Lubinus Clinicum Kiel
Kiel, , Germany
DRK Krankenhaus Luckenwalde
Luckenwalde, , Germany
Orthopädisch-Unfallchirurgisches Zentrum
Mannheim, , Germany
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Białymstoku
Bialystok, , Poland
Wojewódzki Szpital Chirurgii Urazowej
Piekary Śląskie, , Poland
Centrum Medycyny Sportowej
Warsaw, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hoburg A, Niemeyer P, Laute V, Zinser W, Becher C, Kolombe T, Fay J, Pietsch S, Kuzma T, Widuchowski W, Fickert S. Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation with Spheroid Technology Is Superior to Arthroscopic Microfracture at 36 Months Regarding Activities of Daily Living and Sporting Activities after Treatment. Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):437S-448S. doi: 10.1177/1947603519897290. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
Niemeyer P, Laute V, Zinser W, Becher C, Kolombe T, Fay J, Pietsch S, Kuzma T, Widuchowski W, Fickert S. A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase III Noninferiority Trial to Compare the Clinical Efficacy of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation With Spheroid Technology Versus Arthroscopic Microfracture for Cartilage Defects of the Knee. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jul 10;7(7):2325967119854442. doi: 10.1177/2325967119854442. eCollection 2019 Jul.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-016466-82
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
cod16HS13
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.