Efficacy and Safety Study of co.Don Chondrosphere to Treat Cartilage Defects

NCT ID: NCT01222559

Last Updated: 2021-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2020-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, phase III, multicenter, open label, randomised clinical trial of co.don chondrosphere®, a three-dimensional autologous chondrocyte transplantation product (ACT3D-CS)compared to the procedure of microfracture (MF)in the treatment of cartilage defects of knee joints.

After screening visit patients were booked for arthroscopy and at that time they were randomised to either ACT3D-CS with co.don chondrosphere® (Group A) or to MF(Group B), a marrow-stimulating method based on the penetration of the subchondral bone plate at the bottom of the cartilage defect. At the time of arthroscopy Patients of group B had their procedure of MF (treatment surgery) and patients of group A had their cells harvested from healthy cartilage. The cells are cultivated for 8-10 weeks in vitro to develope 3-dimensional spheroids , that are transplanted in an open knee procedure (treatment surgery)into the defect. Patients subsequently followed the same rehabilitation program and had post-surgery visits. After the 12-month-visit a interim analyses will be performed and the 24-month-visit is defined as final assessment. Then patients have follow-up assessments up to 60 months post-treatment-surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

see above

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Articular Cartilage Lesion of the Femoral Condyle

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

co.don chondrosphere®

co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes. The dose depends on the size of the defect, recommended dose is 10-70 spheroids/cm2 defect.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

co.don chondrosphere®

Intervention Type DRUG

co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes. The dose depends on the size of the defect, recommended dose is 10-70 spheroids/cm2 defect.

Micofracture

A procedure in which the subchondral bone is perforated to allow a bloodcloth to form scar tissue.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

co.don chondrosphere®

Intervention Type DRUG

co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes. The dose depends on the size of the defect, recommended dose is 10-70 spheroids/cm2 defect.

Microfracture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A procedure in which the subchondral bone is perforated to allow a bloodcloth to form new tissue.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

co.don chondrosphere®

co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes. The dose depends on the size of the defect, recommended dose is 10-70 spheroids/cm2 defect.

Intervention Type DRUG

Microfracture

A procedure in which the subchondral bone is perforated to allow a bloodcloth to form new tissue.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ACT3D-CS Subchondral drilling

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female patients, age: between 18 and 50 years
2. Defect: isolated ICRS grade III or IV single defect chondral lesions on femoral condyles
3. Defect size: 1 to \< 4 cm2 after debridement to healthy cartilage up to 6 mm in depth.Assessment with MRI at screening and per estimation during arthroscopy prior to randomization
4. Nearly intact chondral structure surrounding the defect as well as an intact corresponding joint area
5. Informed consent signed and dated by patient
6. Patient understands the strict rehabilitation protocol and follow-up programme and is willing to follow it
7. In case of pain, patient agrees to use only paracetamol mono- (max 4 g/day) or combination preparation and oral and/or topic NSAIDs during the trial and to discontinue the use of oral and/or topic NSAIDs and/or paracetamol combination preparation 1 week before each visit whereas the use of paracetamol monopreparation (max 4 g/day) is allowed. However, in the morning of the visit day, no pain medication is allowed. Other pain medications are allowed during surgical procedure and may be taken for a period not exceeding 4 weeks after surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Defects on both knees at the same time
2. Radiological signs of osteoarthritis
3. Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD)
4. Any signs of knee instability
5. Valgus or varus malalignment (more than 5° over the mechanical axis)
6. Clinically relevant second cartilage lesion on the same knee
7. More than 50 % resection of a meniscus in the affected knee or incomplete meniscal rim
8. Rheumatoid arthritis, parainfectious or infectious arthritis, and condition after these diseases
9. Pregnancy and planned pregnancy (no MRI possible)
10. Obesity (Body Mass Index \>30)
11. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
12. Serious illness
13. Poor general health as judged by physician
14. Participation in concurrent clinical trials or previous trials within 3 months of screening
15. Previous treatment with ACT in the affected knee
16. Microfracture performed less than 1 year before screening in the affected knee
17. Alcohol or drug (medication) abuse
18. Meniscal transplant in the affected knee
19. Meniscal suture (in the affected knee) three months prior to baseline
20. Mosaicplasty (Osteoarticular Transplant System, OATS) in the affected knee
21. Having received hyaluronic acid intra-articular injections in the affected knee within the last 3 months before baseline
22. Taking specific osteoarthritis drugs such as chondroïtin sulfate, diacerein, nglucosamine,piascledine, capsaicin within 2 weeks before baseline
23. Corticosteroid treatment by systemic or intraarticular route within the last month of baseline or intramuscular or oral corticosteroïds within the last 2 weeks before baseline
24. Chronic use of anticoagulants
25. Any concomitant painful or disabling disease of the spine, hips or lower limbs that would interfere with evaluation of the afflicted knee
26. Any clinically significant or symptomatic vascular or neurological disorder of the lower extremities
27. Any evidence of the following diseases in the affected knee: septic arthritis, inflammatory joint disease, recurrent episodes of pseudogout, Paget's disease of bone, ochronosis, acromegaly, haemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, primary osteochondromatosis, heritable disorders, collagen gene mutation
28. Current diagnosis of osteomyelitis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1,-2) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

co.don AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefan Fickert, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitätsklinikum der Albert-Ludwig-Universität Freiburg, Department Othopädie und Traumatologie

Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Würrtemberg, Germany

Site Status

Waldkrankenhaus "Rudolf Elle" GmbH Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Eisenberg, Tühringen, Germany

Site Status

Gelenk-und Wirbelsäulenzentrum Steglitz

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

DRK-Kliniken Westend

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

St. Vinzenz-Hospital

Dinslaken, , Germany

Site Status

Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Lubinus Clinicum Kiel

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

DRK Krankenhaus Luckenwalde

Luckenwalde, , Germany

Site Status

Orthopädisch-Unfallchirurgisches Zentrum

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Białymstoku

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Wojewódzki Szpital Chirurgii Urazowej

Piekary Śląskie, , Poland

Site Status

Centrum Medycyny Sportowej

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany Poland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hoburg A, Niemeyer P, Laute V, Zinser W, Becher C, Kolombe T, Fay J, Pietsch S, Kuzma T, Widuchowski W, Fickert S. Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation with Spheroid Technology Is Superior to Arthroscopic Microfracture at 36 Months Regarding Activities of Daily Living and Sporting Activities after Treatment. Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):437S-448S. doi: 10.1177/1947603519897290. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31893951 (View on PubMed)

Niemeyer P, Laute V, Zinser W, Becher C, Kolombe T, Fay J, Pietsch S, Kuzma T, Widuchowski W, Fickert S. A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase III Noninferiority Trial to Compare the Clinical Efficacy of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation With Spheroid Technology Versus Arthroscopic Microfracture for Cartilage Defects of the Knee. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jul 10;7(7):2325967119854442. doi: 10.1177/2325967119854442. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31317047 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-016466-82

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

cod16HS13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.