Phase III Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of NOVOCART 3D Plus vs. Microfracture in Knee Cartilage Defects

NCT ID: NCT01656902

Last Updated: 2023-11-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

263 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2023-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this phase 3 clinical trial, a second generation ACI (autologous chondrocyte implantation technique) is compared to standard of care therapy (microfracture) to treat traumatic cartilage defects of the knee for efficacy and safety. The investigated study treatment NOVOCART 3D plus is a biphasic biological scaffold which contains cultivated chondrocytes derived from the patient in a previous tissue harvest procedure. Allocation to the study treatment is done by randomization in a ration of 2:1 in favor to ACI (investigational product). Follow-up data for efficacy is collected for 2 years: follow-up visits are performed 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months after treatment; additional data for safety will be collected for up to 5 years: 36, 48, and 60 months after treatment. The study involves knee surgery (by arthroscopy, or mini-arthrotomically for implantation surgery), and blood withdrawal for safety within the first year after treatment. Initial imaging is required at baseline. Optional MRI imaging and biomarker collection is done as substudy at specific sites only.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For the cartilage cell product NOVOCART® 3D plus, which is used in the study described here, the company TETEC AG obtained an expanded production authorization from the medication monitoring authorities in compliance with Section 13, Para. 1 of the Medicinal Products Act in 2003. This entitles TETEC AG to produce the pharmaceutical product and already distribute it. More than 6000 patients were already successfully treated with NOVOCART® 3D in Europe since 2003. In order to obtain a general market authorization for NOVOCART® 3D plus, this control group study is conducted, in which the superiority of the safety and effectiveness of carrier-bound Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation with NOVOCART® 3D plus compared to the standard of care microfracture surgery needs to be proven. This study further aims at developing and validating known and new biologic markers for the quality and clinical efficacy of the product as requested in the context of identity, purity and potency characteristics of the medicinal/investigational product.

The patients will receive one of the therapeutic procedures in the study. The treatment procedure which will be used will be decided by a previously specified randomization process. This type of study meets the high quality requirements of the statutorily specified safety and quality regulations which are also referred to as "Good Clinical Practice" (GCP). The probability of the patient being allocated to one of the two treatments is 2:1; that is, an approx. 67% probability of therapy with NOVOCART® 3D plus and an approx. 33% probability of therapy with microfracture. Neither the patient, nor the investigator will be able to influence the treatment assignment.

Patients will be screened for eligibility at the Screening Visit. Each patient will remain in the study for 24 months post-implant for the effectiveness assessments, and then an additional three years to complete the planned post-market phase. Each patient will be in the study for up to five years.

Cells and tissues collected from this study will be used in other in vitro-controlled experiments aimed at developing and validating known and novel biologic markers to quantify cell quality in the context of identity, purity and potency. Prognostic values of these biologic markers will be examined by correlating them with clinical data collected in this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Traumatic Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee Joint

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

N3D plus

NOVOCART® 3D plus (Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation System)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NOVOCART® 3D plus

Intervention Type DRUG

Two-Step intervention: 1) cartilage cells are collected from the patient during arthroscopy 2) collected cartilage cells are cultivated in a sterile environment, seeded in an organic matrix scaffold and implanted into the defect location (knee, femur)

Microfracture

Microfracture is the standard care surgery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Microfracture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

single-step treatment: defect location (knee, femur) is debrided, then bone plate is drilled mechanically to allow cells from the bone marrow to move to the defect location and to develop a scar tissue

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NOVOCART® 3D plus

Two-Step intervention: 1) cartilage cells are collected from the patient during arthroscopy 2) collected cartilage cells are cultivated in a sterile environment, seeded in an organic matrix scaffold and implanted into the defect location (knee, femur)

Intervention Type DRUG

Microfracture

single-step treatment: defect location (knee, femur) is debrided, then bone plate is drilled mechanically to allow cells from the bone marrow to move to the defect location and to develop a scar tissue

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation Microfracture according to Steadman

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient is between 18 and 65 years old at screening OR (in selected countries only) is a pediatric patient (14-17 years old) with closed epiphyseal growth plate (confirmation of closure of epiphyseal growth plate of the index knee by x-ray or MRI required).
2. Patient has a localized articular cartilage defect of the femoral condyle or the trochlea of the knee. 2 localized cartilage defects are accepted if the total defect size is ≤ 6 cm2 and the size of each individual lesion is ≥ 2 cm2, both cartilage defects are located at the femoral condyle and/or the trochlea and both cartilage defects are to be treated with NOVOCART 3D plus or microfracture.
3. Patient has a defect size is between 2 and 6 cm2. Note: defect size can be estimated by MRI at visit 1 if no data is available from medical history.
4. Patient has an intact articulating joint surface (not higher than Grade 2 International Cartilage Repair Society classification, no kissing lesions). Note: ICRS classification can be estimated by MRI at visit 1 if no data is available from medical history.
5. Patient has an intact meniscus; a maximum of 50% resection is allowed. Note: status of meniscus can be estimated at visit 1 if no data is available from medical history.
6. Patient has a stable knee joint or sufficiently reconstructed ligaments. If not, ligament repair must be done before, during or within 6 weeks after cartilage treatment (ACT/microfracture).
7. Patient has free range of motion of the affected knee joint or ≤ 10° of extension and flexion loss.
8. Patient has a defect-grade of III or IV according to the ICRS classification. Note: ICRS classification can be estimated by MRI at visit 1 if not data is available from medical history.
9. Patient has a baseline score of 60/100 on the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation.
10. Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent to participate in the study and to comply with all study requirements, including attending all follow-up visits and assessments and postoperative rehabilitation regimen.
11. Mandatory for France only: Patient benefits of a health insurance regimen.


1. Patient is not pregnant as confirmed by urine pregnancy test before arthroscopy.
2. Patient has a localized articular cartilage defect of the femoral condyle or the trochlea of the knee. 2 localized cartilage defects are accepted if the total defect size is up to 6 cm2 and the size of each individual lesion is at least 2 cm2, both cartilage defects are located at the femoral condyle and/or the trochlea and both cartilage defects are to be treated with NOVOCART 3D plus or microfracture.
3. Patient has a defect size of 2 to 6 cm2 post-debridement.
4. Patient has an intact articulating joint surface (at least (or higher) Grade 2 International Cartilage Repair Society classification) no kissing lesions).
5. Patient has an intact meniscus; a maximum of 50% resection is allowed (no indication for concurrent meniscus transplant).
6. Patient has a stable knee joint or sufficiently reconstructed ligaments. If not, ligament repair must be done during or within 6 weeks after cartilage treatment (ACT/microfracture).
7. Patient has a defect grade of III or IV according to the ICRS classification.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient is the investigator or any subinvestigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, other staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the study.
2. Patient is unable to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
3. Patient has prior surgical treatment of the target knee using mosaicplasty, autologous chondrocyte transplantation and/or microfracture. Note: prior diagnostic arthroscopies with debridement and lavage are acceptable. Ligament repair is accepted, if performed before, during or within 6 weeks after cartilage treatment (ACT/microfracture).
4. Patient has radiologically apparent degenerative joint disease in the target knee as determined by Kellgren and Lawrence grade \> 2 (see Appendix A).
5. Patient has chronic inflammatory arthritis and/or infectious arthritis.
6. Patient has joint space narrowing \> 1/3 in the target knee when compared to the other knee or smaller than 3 mm joint space measured on x-ray.
7. Patient has malalignment (valgus- or varus-deformity) in the target knee. Note: In suspected cases, the mechanical axis must be established radiographically by complete leg imaging in standing position and in a.p. or rather p.a. projection. The Mikulicz line is not allowed to deviate more than 5 mm of the eminentia intercondylaris. If alignment is necessary, surgery has to be performed before, during or within 6 weeks after cartilage treatment (ACT/microfracture).
8. Patient has prior surgical treatment of clinical relevance of the target knee.
9. Patient has an osteochondral defect.
10. Patient has bilateral lower limb pain or low back pain.
11. Patient has a known systemic connective tissue disease.
12. Patient has a current uncontrolled diabetes.
13. Patient has a known history of autoimmune disease.
14. Patient has a known history of immunological suppressive disorder or is taking immunosuppressants.
15. Patient is currently systemically or intra-articularly taking steroids and/or has used steroids within the last 30 days prior to screening visit 1.
16. The patient has a history of HIV/AIDS.
17. The patient has a history of syphilis (Treponema pallidum).
18. The patient has an active hepatitis B or C infection with verified antigens. Note: Patients with a cured hepatitis B or C infection and/or verified antibodies are not excluded.
19. The patient has at the site of surgery an active systemic or local microbial infection, eczematization or inflammable skin alterations (including protozoonosis: Babesiosis, Trypanosomiasis (e.g. Chagas-Disease), Leishmaniasis, persistent bacterial infections, like Brucellosis, spotted and typhus fever, other Rickettsiosis, Leprosy, Recurrent Fever, Melioidosis or Tularaemia).
20. Patient has a known history of cancer within the past 5 years.
21. Patient has a known history of osteoporosis; also patients with primary hyperparathyroidism or hyperthyroidism without satisfactory treatment, chronic renal failure or patients with prior pathological fractures independent of the genesis are excluded.
22. Patient has any degenerative muscular or neurological condition that would interfere with evaluation of outcome measures including but not limited to Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), or multiple sclerosis (MS).
23. Patient has a body mass index (BMI) higher than 35 kg/m2.
24. Patient is a woman who is pregnant or lactating. Note: contraception is indicated for female patients of childbearing potential until the day of cartilage treatment. Female patients who are unwilling to practice a medically acceptable method of birth control until the day of cartilage treatment cannot be included.
25. Patient is currently participating, or has participated in any other clinical study within 3 months prior to the screening visit.
26. Patient has known current or recent history of illicit drug or alcohol abuse or dependence
27. Patient has psychiatric or cognitive impairment that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the patient's ability to comply with the study requirements, e.g., Alzheimer's disease.
28. Patient has any other condition, which, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for the study.
29. Patient has a history of HTLV.
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tetec AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Angele, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitätsklinikum Regensburg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Privatklinik Doebling

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Fakultni nemocnice Brno - Ortopedicka klinika

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Urazova nemocnice v Brne - Traumatologie

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

NH Hospital, a.s., Ortopedicke oddeleni nemocnice Horovice

Hořovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove - Ortopedicka klinika

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Pardubicka nemocnice

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

Fakultni nemocnice v Motole

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

UVN - Vojenska fakultni nemocnice Praha

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Hôpital Ambroise Paré - Service de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologie

Boulogne-Billancourt, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique Saint-Roch

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Clinique V - Clinique du Sport

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU de Saint-Etienne Hôpital Nord - Service orthopedie et traumatologie

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg - Klinik fuer Orthopaedie

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Theresienkrankenhaus

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Orthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik der LMU München

München, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Regensburg

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Uzsoki utcai Kórház

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Petz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

B-A-Z Megyei Központi Kórház és Egyetemi Oktatókórház

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Markusovszky Egyetemi Oktatókórház

Szombathely, , Hungary

Site Status

Kastélypark Klinika

Tata, , Hungary

Site Status

Hospital of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Trauma Department

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Orto Clinic

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Kaunas clinical hospital

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Klaipeda university hospital

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

JSC "Kardiolita"

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

JSC "SK Impeks Medicinos Diagnostikos Centras"

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Szpital sw. Lukasza BGL Sp z o.o. S.K.A.

Bielsko-Biala, , Poland

Site Status

Samozdzielny Publiczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Miejskiego Szpitala Zespolonego

Częstochowa, , Poland

Site Status

Szpital Angelius

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Samozdzielny Publiczny Wojewodzki Szpital Chirurgii Urazowej

Piekary Śląskie, , Poland

Site Status

Centrum Medycyny Sportowej

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Basel

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital

Exeter, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Czechia France Germany Hungary Latvia Lithuania Poland Switzerland United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAG-G-H-1202

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id