Knee Articular Cartilage Repair: Cartilage Autograft Implantation System Versus Conventional Microfracture

NCT ID: NCT01498029

Last Updated: 2012-03-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) is a single-stage procedure in which cartilage is harvested from non-critical regions of articular cartilage, but then immediately morcellated and loaded onto a polymer membrane-scaffold, which is subsequently used to fill the chondral defect. The autograft-membrane composite is fixed to the defect with a biodegradable staple.

The investigators aim to evaluate this new technique through a pilot clinical trial involving 36 patients randomized into microfracture and CAIS treatment arms (randomisation ratio 1:2), with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, using both clinical and radiological (magnetic resonance imaging) outcomes. If the results of this pilot trial are successful, the investigators plan to expand the study by recruiting more patients to achieve a suitably-powered trial.

Primary hypothesis 1: That functional scores will increase by at least 0.5 SD over pre-operative values, by 1 year following the CAIS procedure

Primary hypothesis 2: That articular cartilage height will have a sustained increase of at least 2 mm at 1 year following the CAIS procedure

Primary hypothesis 3: That functional scores in the CAIS group will be equivalent or superior to those in the microfracture group

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Articular cartilage has limited potential for regeneration, and full-thickness cartilage defects in the knee are frequently symptomatic and debilitating. If left untreated, such injuries may progress to generalized osteoarthritis. The management of these injuries remains unsatisfactory despite intense research activity, and the clinical and social impact of this problem is growing, involving as it often does the young and the active.

Numerous surgical techniques have been developed to treat these injuries, but none has yet been shown to be superior. One of the most widely employed and best-studied means of achieving cartilage repair in patients with discrete regions of chondral destruction in the knee is that of microfracture. Microfracture is an arthroscopic technique that involves penetrating the subchondral bone at the base of full-thickness articular cartilage defects, thus allowing marrow pluripotent stem cells to egress into the chondral defect, facilitating cartilage repair. However, doubts have been raised concerning the quality and durability of the microfracture-induced repair tissue. In recent years, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has emerged as the technique with the greatest potential for advancing the management of chondral injury. In this procedure, autologous chondrocytes are harvested from non-critical areas on the articular surface, then expanded through cell culture in the laboratory, before being implanted 4-6 weeks later into the chondral defect, using a 'patch' of adjacent periosteum for containment of the cells within the defect. There are several disadvantages to the ACI technique just described: it is a two-stage procedure, chondrocyte culture can be lengthy and expensive, and the periosteal patch used to contain the cells is associated with a significant risk of complications such as detachment and hypertrophy. 2nd generation ACI techniques have focused on addressing some of these problems by substituting the periosteum patch with artificial membranes that served as scaffolds for the cultured chondrocytes.

A novel technique has recently been developed that could prove to avoid some of the deficiencies of the ACI technique. The Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) is a single-stage procedure in which cartilage is harvested from non-critical regions of articular cartilage, but then immediately morcellated and loaded onto a polymer membrane-scaffold, which is subsequently used to fill the chondral defect. The autograft-membrane composite is fixed to the defect with a biodegradable staple.

We aim to evaluate this new technique through a pilot clinical trial involving 36 patients randomized into microfracture and CAIS treatment arms (randomisation ratio 1:2), with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, using both clinical and radiological (magnetic resonance imaging) outcomes. If the results of this pilot trial are successful, we plan to expand the study by recruiting more patients to achieve a suitably-powered trial.

Primary hypothesis 1: That functional scores will increase by at least 0.5 SD over pre-operative values, by 1 year following the CAIS procedure

Primary hypothesis 2: That articular cartilage height will have a sustained increase of at least 2 mm at 1 year following the CAIS procedure

Primary hypothesis 3: That functional scores in the CAIS group will be equivalent or superior to those in the microfracture group

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Other Articular Cartilage Disorders Osteochondritis Dissecans

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Randomized to Microfracture

This group of patients who have been randomised to receive microfracture procedure will be the control group for this study

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Microfracture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The microfracture procedure is a standard method for treatment of cartilage damage in which the surgeon will clean the site of your cartilage damage and then will make several small holes in your bone to stimulate your bone marrow with the intention to repair the damaged area with new cartilage tissue

Randomized to CAIS

This group of patients who have been randomised to receive the CAIS procedure will be the experimental group for this study

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) is a kit of devices that utilizes morselized autologous hyaline cartilage harvested arthroscopically, affixed onto a synthetic, resorbable implant using a fibrin sealant and implanted in a single surgical procedure. The system is designed as a surgical treatment of damaged knee cartilage using the subject's own healthy cartilage obtained from a non-weight or low weight-bearing region.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Microfracture

The microfracture procedure is a standard method for treatment of cartilage damage in which the surgeon will clean the site of your cartilage damage and then will make several small holes in your bone to stimulate your bone marrow with the intention to repair the damaged area with new cartilage tissue

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS)

The Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) is a kit of devices that utilizes morselized autologous hyaline cartilage harvested arthroscopically, affixed onto a synthetic, resorbable implant using a fibrin sealant and implanted in a single surgical procedure. The system is designed as a surgical treatment of damaged knee cartilage using the subject's own healthy cartilage obtained from a non-weight or low weight-bearing region.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Knee Cartilage Cartilage Repair Knee Cartilage Cartilage Repair

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Full-thickness articular cartilage defect on the femoral condyle or trochlea greater than 2 cm2 but less than 10 cm2 in total surface area, following debridement to healthy, stable tissue.
* Knee mechanical axis malalignment of not more than 3 degrees either varus or valgus from neutral.
* Patient is fit for surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

* Multifocal disease
* Tibial plateau lesions
* Patella lesions
* Absent menisci or meniscal tears that are unstable and cannot be successfully debrided
* Non-intact cruciate and collateral ligaments
* Inflammatory or crystalline arthropathy
* Systemic medication or conditions likely to compromise chondrocyte cell proliferation and differentiation, e.g. Cushing's syndrome, chemotherapy
* Morbid obesity (more than 150% ideal body weight)
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Singapore General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shi-Lu Chia, PhD, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Singapore General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Singapore General Hospital

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shi-Lu Chia, PhD, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

+65 98171 102

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Shi-Lu Chia, PhD, MBBS

Role: primary

+65 9817 1102

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CART/ 5 April 2011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

3D-Printed Grafts for Knee Cartilage Repair
NCT07312175 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA