Knee Articular Cartilage Repair: Cartilage Autograft Implantation System Versus Conventional Microfracture
NCT ID: NCT01498029
Last Updated: 2012-03-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators aim to evaluate this new technique through a pilot clinical trial involving 36 patients randomized into microfracture and CAIS treatment arms (randomisation ratio 1:2), with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, using both clinical and radiological (magnetic resonance imaging) outcomes. If the results of this pilot trial are successful, the investigators plan to expand the study by recruiting more patients to achieve a suitably-powered trial.
Primary hypothesis 1: That functional scores will increase by at least 0.5 SD over pre-operative values, by 1 year following the CAIS procedure
Primary hypothesis 2: That articular cartilage height will have a sustained increase of at least 2 mm at 1 year following the CAIS procedure
Primary hypothesis 3: That functional scores in the CAIS group will be equivalent or superior to those in the microfracture group
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Autologous Cell-derived Tissue Engineered Cartilage for Repairing Articular Cartilage Lesions
NCT02770209
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MegaCarti^® in Knee Cartilage Defects
NCT06249828
Autologous Cartilage Implantation vs Arthroscopic Debridement
NCT02636881
Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) for the Repair of Knee Cartilage Through Cartilage Regeneration
NCT00881023
Study on Efficacy and Safety of CaReSR-1S to Repair Cartilage Defects of the Knee
NCT03307668
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Numerous surgical techniques have been developed to treat these injuries, but none has yet been shown to be superior. One of the most widely employed and best-studied means of achieving cartilage repair in patients with discrete regions of chondral destruction in the knee is that of microfracture. Microfracture is an arthroscopic technique that involves penetrating the subchondral bone at the base of full-thickness articular cartilage defects, thus allowing marrow pluripotent stem cells to egress into the chondral defect, facilitating cartilage repair. However, doubts have been raised concerning the quality and durability of the microfracture-induced repair tissue. In recent years, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has emerged as the technique with the greatest potential for advancing the management of chondral injury. In this procedure, autologous chondrocytes are harvested from non-critical areas on the articular surface, then expanded through cell culture in the laboratory, before being implanted 4-6 weeks later into the chondral defect, using a 'patch' of adjacent periosteum for containment of the cells within the defect. There are several disadvantages to the ACI technique just described: it is a two-stage procedure, chondrocyte culture can be lengthy and expensive, and the periosteal patch used to contain the cells is associated with a significant risk of complications such as detachment and hypertrophy. 2nd generation ACI techniques have focused on addressing some of these problems by substituting the periosteum patch with artificial membranes that served as scaffolds for the cultured chondrocytes.
A novel technique has recently been developed that could prove to avoid some of the deficiencies of the ACI technique. The Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) is a single-stage procedure in which cartilage is harvested from non-critical regions of articular cartilage, but then immediately morcellated and loaded onto a polymer membrane-scaffold, which is subsequently used to fill the chondral defect. The autograft-membrane composite is fixed to the defect with a biodegradable staple.
We aim to evaluate this new technique through a pilot clinical trial involving 36 patients randomized into microfracture and CAIS treatment arms (randomisation ratio 1:2), with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, using both clinical and radiological (magnetic resonance imaging) outcomes. If the results of this pilot trial are successful, we plan to expand the study by recruiting more patients to achieve a suitably-powered trial.
Primary hypothesis 1: That functional scores will increase by at least 0.5 SD over pre-operative values, by 1 year following the CAIS procedure
Primary hypothesis 2: That articular cartilage height will have a sustained increase of at least 2 mm at 1 year following the CAIS procedure
Primary hypothesis 3: That functional scores in the CAIS group will be equivalent or superior to those in the microfracture group
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Randomized to Microfracture
This group of patients who have been randomised to receive microfracture procedure will be the control group for this study
Microfracture
The microfracture procedure is a standard method for treatment of cartilage damage in which the surgeon will clean the site of your cartilage damage and then will make several small holes in your bone to stimulate your bone marrow with the intention to repair the damaged area with new cartilage tissue
Randomized to CAIS
This group of patients who have been randomised to receive the CAIS procedure will be the experimental group for this study
Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS)
The Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) is a kit of devices that utilizes morselized autologous hyaline cartilage harvested arthroscopically, affixed onto a synthetic, resorbable implant using a fibrin sealant and implanted in a single surgical procedure. The system is designed as a surgical treatment of damaged knee cartilage using the subject's own healthy cartilage obtained from a non-weight or low weight-bearing region.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Microfracture
The microfracture procedure is a standard method for treatment of cartilage damage in which the surgeon will clean the site of your cartilage damage and then will make several small holes in your bone to stimulate your bone marrow with the intention to repair the damaged area with new cartilage tissue
Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS)
The Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) is a kit of devices that utilizes morselized autologous hyaline cartilage harvested arthroscopically, affixed onto a synthetic, resorbable implant using a fibrin sealant and implanted in a single surgical procedure. The system is designed as a surgical treatment of damaged knee cartilage using the subject's own healthy cartilage obtained from a non-weight or low weight-bearing region.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Knee mechanical axis malalignment of not more than 3 degrees either varus or valgus from neutral.
* Patient is fit for surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
* Tibial plateau lesions
* Patella lesions
* Absent menisci or meniscal tears that are unstable and cannot be successfully debrided
* Non-intact cruciate and collateral ligaments
* Inflammatory or crystalline arthropathy
* Systemic medication or conditions likely to compromise chondrocyte cell proliferation and differentiation, e.g. Cushing's syndrome, chemotherapy
* Morbid obesity (more than 150% ideal body weight)
21 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Singapore General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shi-Lu Chia, PhD, MBBS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Singapore General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CART/ 5 April 2011
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.