Confirmatory Study of NeoCart in Knee Cartilage Repair

NCT ID: NCT01066702

Last Updated: 2019-03-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

245 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2019-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This confirmatory study is a prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of an autologous chondrocyte tissue implant (NeoCart) to the surgical intervention microfracture in the treatment of cartilage defects in the knee.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee Joint

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NeoCart

Autologous cartilagenous tissue implant

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NeoCart

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

implantation of an cartilagenous tissue implant derived from the patients own cells.

Microfracture

surgical intervention

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Microfracture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

holes are created in bone at the base of the defect bed to encourage growth of tissue within the defect bed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NeoCart

implantation of an cartilagenous tissue implant derived from the patients own cells.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Microfracture

holes are created in bone at the base of the defect bed to encourage growth of tissue within the defect bed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* greater than 18 years old
* symptomatic articular cartilage lesion of the femur and/or trochlea

Exclusion Criteria

* prior surgical intervention other than debridement
* arthritis
* clinically significant or symptomatic vascular or neurologic disorder of the lower extremities
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

59 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Histogenics Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrea Belschner

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Histogenics Corporation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tucson Orthopaedic Institute

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Grossmont Orthopedic Medical Group

La Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Orthopaedic Specialty Institute/Newport Orthopedic Institute (OSI/NOI)

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

UCSF Mission Bay Orthopaedic Institute

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Southern California Orthopedic Research and Education

Van Nuys, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado University Boulder

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Steadman Hawkins Clinic - Denver

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Shrock Clinical Research

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jewett Orthopaedic Clinic

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Optim Healthcare

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

St. Lukes Medical Center

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

OrthoIndy

Greenwood, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Clinic Sports Medicine

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Orthopaedic Associates

Portland, Maine, United States

Site Status

Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates

West Roxbury, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

William Beaumont Hospital

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

TRIA Orthopaedic Center

Bloomington, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Alpine Orthopedics & Sports Medicine

Bozeman, Montana, United States

Site Status

University of New Mexico

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Hospital for Special Surgery

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke Sports Medicine

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University - Department of Sports Medicine

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group (TSAOG)

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Orthopedic Specialty Hospital

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Simon Fraser Orthopaedic Fund

New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Fowler Kennedy Sports Medicine Clinic

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Crawford DC, DeBerardino TM, Williams RJ 3rd. NeoCart, an autologous cartilage tissue implant, compared with microfracture for treatment of distal femoral cartilage lesions: an FDA phase-II prospective, randomized clinical trial after two years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jun 6;94(11):979-89. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00533.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22637204 (View on PubMed)

Crawford DC, Heveran CM, Cannon WD Jr, Foo LF, Potter HG. An autologous cartilage tissue implant NeoCart for treatment of grade III chondral injury to the distal femur: prospective clinical safety trial at 2 years. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jul;37(7):1334-43. doi: 10.1177/0363546509333011. Epub 2009 May 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19448048 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.histogenics.com

Histogenics WebSite

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

8-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

NOVOCART 3D Treatment Following Microfracture Failure
NCT03219307 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3