Evaluation of an Acellular Osteochondral Graft for Cartilage LEsions Pilot Trial
NCT ID: NCT01183637
Last Updated: 2015-05-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
2 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-06-30
2014-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neocartilage Implant to Treat Cartilage Lesions of the Knee
NCT01400607
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Microfracture and Modified Microfracture
NCT02539030
Synovium Brushing to Augmented Microfracture for Improved Cartilage Repair
NCT02696876
Confirmatory Study of NeoCart in Knee Cartilage Repair
NCT01066702
Clinical Trial for the Regeneration of Cartilage Lesions in the Knee
NCT02673905
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Kensey Nash Corp. Cartilage Repair Device is a two layer, bioresorbable implant. The top layer consists of collagen fibers like those found in normal cartilage. The collagen layer is about as thick as the cartilage in human knees. The bottom layer of the Cartilage Repair Device mainly consists of a calcium mineral naturally found in human bones. The mineral is held within a biodegradable polymer material. The device has a highly porous structure that allows the blood, stem cells and joint fluid to infiltrate the device during the healing process. Over time, the top layer is designed to be replaced by cartilage and the bottom layer is designed to be replaced by bone.
Both microfracture and the Cartilage Repair Device are expected to reduce knee pain and increase knee function in a majority of patients during the first 2 years post-operative. However, if the Cartilage Repair Device produces better and more durable cartilage than the microfracture technique, those patients treated with the Cartilage Repair Device may have a better long term outcome.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment
Patients assigned to the treatment arm will receive treatment with the Kensey Nash Corp. Cartilage Repair Device.
Kensey Nash Corp. Cartilage Repair Device
To perform the Cartilage Repair Device implantation procedure, the surgeon first removes the damaged cartilage. Then, the surgeon creates a cylindrical hole in the bone below the area of damaged cartilage. The Cartilage Repair Device is then implanted into the hole so that the surface is level with the surrounding native cartilage. The Cartilage Repair Device will then absorb blood and bone marrow from the bone to begin the healing process.
Control
Patients assigned to the Control Arm will receive treatment with the standard surgical technique known as microfracture.
Microfracture
To perform the microfracture technique, the surgeon will first remove the damaged cartilage. Then, the surgeon will make a number of small fractures in the bone below the area of damaged cartilage. The fractures cause the bone to bleed and a clot to form over the exposed bone. Over time, the clot forms a layer of fibrocartilage over the bone.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Kensey Nash Corp. Cartilage Repair Device
To perform the Cartilage Repair Device implantation procedure, the surgeon first removes the damaged cartilage. Then, the surgeon creates a cylindrical hole in the bone below the area of damaged cartilage. The Cartilage Repair Device is then implanted into the hole so that the surface is level with the surrounding native cartilage. The Cartilage Repair Device will then absorb blood and bone marrow from the bone to begin the healing process.
Microfracture
To perform the microfracture technique, the surgeon will first remove the damaged cartilage. Then, the surgeon will make a number of small fractures in the bone below the area of damaged cartilage. The fractures cause the bone to bleed and a clot to form over the exposed bone. Over time, the clot forms a layer of fibrocartilage over the bone.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* KOOS Pain subscale score is less than 65 (i.e. moderate pain)
* KOOS Activities of Daily Living score is less than 70 (i.e. moderate functional limitations)
* ICRS grade 3 or 4 cartilage lesion on the medial femoral condyle, lateral femoral condyle or trochlea measuring less than or equal to 15mm in diameter
* Stable meniscus with greater than 50% remaining bilaterally
* Mental capacity and willingness to comply with the post-operative rehabilitation plan and follow-up evaluations
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindication for MRI
* Previous microfracture, autograft implantation, allograft implantation or autologous chondrocyte implantation procedure on the damaged cartilage surface
* Knee ligament surgery within the past 6 months
* Clinically significant knee malalignment
* Osteoarthritis in the knee
* Multiple cartilage lesions
* Inflammatory arthropathy (i.e. rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus or active gout)
* Active infection in either lower limb
* Hyaluronic acid or cortisone injections within the past 3 months
* History of substance abuse
* Current participation in a study of an investigational product for a similar purpose
* Active litigation for the knee injury
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kensey Nash Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard C Lehman, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
U.S. Center for Sports Medicine, Kirkwood, MO
Phillip A Davidson, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Heiden - Davidson Orthopedics, Park City, UT
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peninsula Orthopedic Associates
Salisbury, Maryland, United States
U.S. Center for Sports Medicine
Kirkwood, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EAGLE Pilot
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.