Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Cartistem and Microfracture in Patients With Knee Articular Cartilage Injury

NCT ID: NCT01041001

Last Updated: 2017-04-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

104 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-02-28

Study Completion Date

2011-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of the allogeneic-unrelated umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell product (Cartistem®) to that of a microfracture treatment in patients with articular cartilage defect or injury.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The cartilage is a unique avascular, aneural tissue that does not regenerate easily once damaged. Chondral defects or damages to articular cartilages due to accidents, necrosis of subchondral bone tissue, or arthritis have become some of the more common disorders today. About 15% of the world's population is reportedly suffering from cartilage and joint damages such as degenerative arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. As population aging progresses and as more young people start taking up active sports, the size of the target patient group is also growing. However, despite ongoing research, an effective treatment for cartilage defects is yet to be discovered. Various different types of treatments are currently in use, such as drug therapy, arthroscopy, and artificial joint surgery. However, they all fail to address the root cause. Complete treatment, or regeneration of damaged or defective cartilage is impossible and continuous drug administration or secondary surgeries are required in many cases.

As a way of regenerating the damaged or defective cartilage tissue, treatment of localized damage to articular cartilage using autologous chondrocytes is currently under review. A few life science companies both home and abroad are marketing this method of treatment called 'autologous chondrocyte transplant'. The treatment involves the extraction of healthy cartilage tissue from the patient which is then cultured and transplanted into the damaged site.

However, this treatment requires the extraction of chondrocytes directly from the patient and thus causes trauma in healthy articular cartilage. Also, this type of treatment cannot be applied to large lesions, nor is the efficacy satisfactory in patients over the age of 40 whose cellular activation levels are low. Thus, autologous chondrocyte transplant is rather limited in the number of cells harvested and their activation level and is therefore restricted in terms of treatment site, severity of the condition, and the size of lesion. The current technology allows the application of treatments in local cartilage defects but not in degenerative arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. The technology needs to be taken up to another level in order to benefit such prevalent arthritic disorders. Treatments using stem cells do not cause damage to healthy articular cartilage as they don't require the harvesting of healthy cartilage tissues from the patients. Moreover, the number of successfully cultured cells is larger due to the excellent proliferation capability of stem cells and thus, mass supply is possible.

This clinical trial for the stem cell therapies is essential because treatment of cartilage defects with umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells, known to have the highest level of activity among all adult stem cells, opens the possibility of articular cartilage regeneration even for aged patients and patients with large lesions unable to benefit from existing treatments.

The biggest challenge faced by nations competing in the field of "tissue differentiation and regeneration using stem cells" is the question of whether or not the use of embryonic stem cells is ethical. Chondrogenesis using umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells can not only avoid similar challenges, but also present an innovative treatment mode with significant clinical implications for the patients.

In the clinical study, mesenchymal stem cells will be isolated from umbilical cord blood and cultured, mixed with semi- solid polymer, and administered into the cartilage tissue lesion by orthopedic surgery in order to stimulate the regeneration of defective cartilage tissue and to improve their functions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cartilage Injury Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cartistem

A single dose of 500㎕/㎠ of cartilage defect

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cartistem

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

allogeneic-unrelated umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell product

Microfracture treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Microfracture treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cartistem

allogeneic-unrelated umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell product

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Microfracture treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with knee joint cartilage defect or injury of ICRS (International Cartilage Repair Society) Grade 4 confirmed by arthroscopy (At screening, patients diagnosed as such with an MRI may be included)
* Male or female patients at least 18 years of age
* Patients whose lesion (unilateral joint) is 2 ㎠ \~ 9㎠ in size
* Patients with articular swelling, tenderness and active range of motion of Grade 2 or below
* Patients with pain in affected joint of 60-mm or below on a 100-mm VAS (visual analogue scale)
* Patients with adequate blood coagulation activity, PT(INR) \< 1.5, APTT \<1.5×control
* Patients with adequate renal function, Creatinine ≤ 2.0 ㎎/㎗, levels of proteinuria measured with Dipstick: trace or less
* Patients with adequate hepatic function, Bilirubin ≤ 2.0 ㎎/㎗, AST/ALT ≤ 100 IU/L
* Patients who have received no surgery or radiation therapy in the affected joint within the past 6 six weeks, and have recovered from the side effects of such past treatments
* Female patients of childbearing potential must agree to practice adequate methods of birth control to prevent pregnancy during the study
* Patients whose physical examination results show no ligament instability of Grade II or above (Grade 0: none, Grade I: 0-5 mm, Grade II: 5-10 mm, Grade III: \>10 mm)
* Patients who voluntarily agreed to enroll in the study and signed an informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with autoimmune disease or the medical history
* Patients with infections requiring parenteral administration of antibiotics
* Patients with myocardial infarction, ischemic heart failure, other serious heart conditions or uncontrolled hypertension, or any medical history of such diseases
* Patients with serious internal diseases
* Patients who are currently pregnant or nursing
* Patients with psychotic diseases, epilepsy, or any history of such diseases
* Patients with alcohol abuse
* Patients who smoke excessively
* Patients with chronic inflammatory articular diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis
* Patients who were enrolled in any other clinical trials within the past four weeks
* Patients who had been administered with immunosuppressants such as Cyclosporin A or azathioprine within the past six weeks
* Patients whose physical examination results show ligament instability of Grade II or above (Grade 0: none, Grade I: 0-5 mm, Grade II: 5-10 mm, Grade III: \>10 mm)
* Patients with a known history of hypersensitivity/allergy to gentamicin
* Patients who the principal investigator considers inappropriate for the clinical trial due to any other reasons than those listed above
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medipost Co Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hong-chul Lim, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Korea University Guro Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gachon University Gil Hospital

Incheon, Gyunggido, South Korea

Site Status

Inha University Hospital

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Hanyang University Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul Veterans Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Samsung Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Asan Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Korea University Guro Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lim HC, Park YB, Ha CW, Cole BJ, Lee BK, Jeong HJ, Kim MK, Bin SI, Choi CH, Choi CH, Yoo JD; Cartistem Research Group; Yoon JR, Chung JY. Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation Versus Microfracture for Large, Full-Thickness Cartilage Defects in Older Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial and Extended 5-Year Clinical Follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jan 12;9(1):2325967120973052. doi: 10.1177/2325967120973052. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33490296 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MP-CRP-005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

NeoCart Phase 2 Clinical Trial
NCT00548119 COMPLETED PHASE2