Comparison of BioCartilage Versus Marrow Stimulating Procedure for Cartilage Defects of the Knee
NCT ID: NCT02203071
Last Updated: 2020-03-16
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
25 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-06-30
2018-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
During the surgical operation for MSP, a portion of the patient's blood is taken out and used to form a patch to cover a cartilage defect of the knee. Currently it is considered standard of care to either form the patch using only a portion of the patient's blood, or form the patch using a portion of the patient's blood combined with an FDA-approved augmentation such as BioCartilage.
This study will collect outcomes data and MRI for patients that are undergoing MSP with and without BioCartilage augmentation, then compare the data between those who received BioCartilage and those who did not.
The primary endpoint is to determine whether subjects receiving a marrow stimulating procedure (MSP) augmented with BioCartilage have improved outcomes (measured using quality of life indicators, functional outcomes, and MRI) compared to subjects who receive MSP without the use of BioCartilage.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Knee Cartilage Injuries
NCT02118519
A Biologic Joint Replacement Strategy for Knee Trauma and Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis
NCT03719417
IMPACT: Safety and Feasibility of a Single-stage Procedure for Focal Cartilage Lesions of the Knee.
NCT02037204
Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Cartistem and Microfracture in Patients With Knee Articular Cartilage Injury
NCT01041001
Phase 3 Pivotal Trial Comparing CARTISTEM® and Surgical Comparator for Knee Cartilage Lesions and Osteoarthritis
NCT07339111
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The microfracture procedure is performed with PowerPick. During the procedure, a patient with focal cartilage defect undergoes arthroscopic debridement of the defect before microfracture is used to create holes in the subchondral plate in order to provide access to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). To complete this marrow stimulating procedure (MSP), the microfractured region is filled with PRP harvested intraoperatively from the patient. A fibrin glue is then used to cover the defect and hold the PRP repair in place.
This basic MSP has been shown to regenerate cartilage tissue and improve joint function. Microfracture treatments using PRP are "shown to have good to excellent short-term outcomes in appropriately indicated patients" (Abrams, Mall, Fortier, Roller, \& Cole, 2013), however successful long-term outcomes have not been demonstrated in the literature.
BioCartilage, a novel therapy developed by Arthrex Inc, is implemented as an augmentation of the basic approach of using microfracture and PRP. All aspects of the procedure, as well as indications for the procedure, are the same as the basic MSP described above, except the PRP is combined with BioCartilage powder, which acts as a scaffolding for cellular growth. BioCartilage is an FDA approved augmentation of microfracture treatment with PRP, and the powder itself contains no living cells.
Animal models using BioCartilage have provided data that supports the assertion that the BioCartilage augmentation may improve outcomes for patients who receive it; however there is currently no published human clinical outcomes data available for using BioCartilage (Abrams et al., 2013).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MSP with BioCartilage
Patients receiving marrow stimulating procedure with BioCartilage adjunct.
No interventions assigned to this group
MSP without BioCartilage
Patients receiving marrow stimulating procedure without BioCartilage.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The subject is a candidate for the use of a MSP with microfracture and PRP, with or without augmentation with BioCartilage, for treatment of a focal defect of the knee (trochlea or femoral condyle).
* The subject is 18-years of age or greater
* The subject is able and willing to consent to participate in the study
* The subject is expected to be able to safely undergo MRI at the 1-year follow-up visit (no contraindications present, such as metal implants)
* Infection or inflammatory arthropathy (such as rheumatoid arthritis) is absent in the operative knee
Exclusion Criteria
* The subject is undergoing bilateral knee surgery
* The subject is unwilling, or unable to consent due to psychiatric condition or legal incompetence
* The subject is either pregnant, or a prisoner
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Arthrex, Inc.
INDUSTRY
University of Missouri-Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
James Stannard
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James P Stannard, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Missouri-Columbia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Missouri Orthopaedic Institute
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shah SS, Lee S, Mithoefer K. Next-Generation Marrow Stimulation Technology for Cartilage Repair: Basic Science to Clinical Application. JBJS Rev. 2021 Jan 19;9(1):e20.00090. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00090.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1211220
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.