Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of 3 Different Doses of co.Don Chondrosphere to Treat Large Cartilage Defects
NCT ID: NCT01225575
Last Updated: 2018-03-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-10-31
2018-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
After screening visit patients were booked for arthroscopy and had their cells harvesting from healthy cartilage. After the arthroscopy the patients were randomised in one of the three dose-groups. The cells are cultivated for 8-10 weeks in vitro to develope 3-dimensional spheroids, that are transplanted in an open knee procedure (treatment surgery)into the defect. Patients of all dose groups subsequently followed the same rehabilitation program and had post-surgery visits. The 12-month-visit is defined as final assessment. Then patients have follow-up assessments up to 60 months.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety Study of co.Don Chondrosphere to Treat Cartilage Defects
NCT01222559
Evaluation of Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee in the Form of Chondromalacia of the Articular Cartilage Treated in the Arthroscopic Technique With the Use of:Autogenous Transplantation of Fragmented Adipose Tissue,PRP GF,Mesenchymal Cells,Hyaluronic Acid-low Molecular Weight and Cross-linked
NCT07110402
The Post-marketing Surveillance to Evaluate the Efficacy of CHONDRON (Autologous Cultured Chondrocyte) by Arthroscopy
NCT02539069
Effects of CHONDRON (Autologous Chondrocytes) With Ankle Cartilage Defect
NCT01050816
The Post-marketing Surveillance to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a CHONDRON (Autologous Cultured Chondrocyte)
NCT02539056
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
co.don chondrosphere®, 3-7 spheroids/cm2
co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes.
The dose in group A is 3-7 spheroids/cm2 defect
co.don chondrosphere®
co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes.
The dose in group A is 3-7 spheroids/cm2 defect, in group B 10-30 spheroids/cm2 defect and in group C 40-70 spheroids/cm2 defect
co.don chondrosphere®,10-30spheroids/cm2
co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes.
The dose in group B is 10-30 spheroids/cm2 defect
co.don chondrosphere®
co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes.
The dose in group A is 3-7 spheroids/cm2 defect, in group B 10-30 spheroids/cm2 defect and in group C 40-70 spheroids/cm2 defect
co.don chondrosphere®,40-70spheroids/cm2
co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes.
The dose in group C is 40-70 Spheroids/cm2 defect
co.don chondrosphere®
co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes.
The dose in group A is 3-7 spheroids/cm2 defect, in group B 10-30 spheroids/cm2 defect and in group C 40-70 spheroids/cm2 defect
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
co.don chondrosphere®
co.don chondrosphere® are spheroids in suspension, developed from autologous chondrocytes.
The dose in group A is 3-7 spheroids/cm2 defect, in group B 10-30 spheroids/cm2 defect and in group C 40-70 spheroids/cm2 defect
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Defect: isolated ICRS grade III or IV single defect on medial or lateral femoral condyle, trochlea, tibia and retropatellar defects, also OCD (in case of OCD: Bone grafting up to the level of the original bone lamella must be performed if bone loss exceeds 3 mm in depth)
3. Defect size: ≥ 4 to 10 cm2 after debridement to healthy cartilage; chondral lesions, including osteochondritis dissecans on femoral condyle, trochlea, tibia,retropatellar defects up to 6 mm in depth. Assessment with MRI at Screening and per estimation during arthroscopy prior to randomization
4. Nearly intact surrounding chondral structure around the defect as well as corresponding joint area
5. Informed consent signed by patient
6. Patient understands strict rehabilitation protocol and follow-up programme and is willing to follow it.
7. In case of pain, patient agrees to use only paracetamol mono- (max 4 g/day) or combination preparation and oral and/or topic NSAIDs during the trial and to discontinue the use of oral and/or topic NSAIDs and/or paracetamol combination preparation 1 week before each visit whereas the use of paracetamol mono-preparation (max 4 g/day) is allowed. However, in the morning of the visit day, no pain medication is allowed. However, in the morning of the visit day, no pain medication is allowed. Other pain medications are allowed during surgical operation and may be taken for a period not exceeding 4 weeks after surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Radiological signs of osteoarthritis
3. Any signs of knee instability
4. Valgus or varus malalignment (more than 5° over the mechanical axis)
5. Clinically relevant second cartilage lesion on the same knee
6. More than 50 % resection of a meniscus in the affected knee or incomplete meniscal rim
7. Rheumatoid arthritis, parainfectious or infectious arthritis, and condition after these diseases
8. Pregnancy and planned pregnancy (no MRI possible)
9. Obesity (Body Mass Index \>30)
10. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
11. Serious illness
12. Poor general health as judged by physician
13. Participation in concurrent clinical trials or previous trials within 3 months of screening
14. Previous treatment with ACT in the affected knee
15. Microfracture performed less than 1 year before screening in the affected knee
16. Alcohol or drug (medication) abuse
17. Meniscal transplant in the affected knee
18. Meniscal suture (in the affected knee) three months prior to baseline
19. Mosaicplasty (Osteoarticular Transplant System, OATS) in the affected knee
20. Having received hyaluronic acid intra-articular injections in the affected knee within the last 3 months of baseline
21. Taking specific osteoarthritis drugs such as chondroitin sulfate, diacerein, n-glucosamine, piascledine, capsaicin within 2 weeks of baseline
22. Corticosteroid treatment by systemic or intra-articular route within the last month of baseline or intramuscular or oral corticosteroids within the last 2 weeks of baseline
23. Chronic use of anticoagulants
24. Any concomitant painful or disabling disease of the spine, hips or lower limbs that would interfere with evaluation of the afflicted knee
25. Any clinically significant or symptomatic vascular or neurological disorder of the lower extremities
26. Any evidence of the following diseases in the affected knee: septic arthritis,inflammatory joint disease, recurrent episodes of pseudogout, Paget's disease of bone, ochronosis, acromegaly, haemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, primary osteochondromatosis, heritable disorders, collagen gene mutation
27. Current diagnosis of osteomyelitis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1, 2) and/or hepatitis C (HCV) infection
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
co.don AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefan Fickert, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitätsklinikum der Albert-Ludwig-Universität Freiburg, Department Othopädie und Traumatologie
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Würrtemberg, Germany
ATOS Klinikum Heidelberg, Zentrum für Knie- und Fußchirurgie
Heidelberg, Baden-Würrtemberg, Germany
Gelenk-und Wirbelsäulenzentrum Steglitz
Berlin, , Germany
DRK-Kliniken Westend
Berlin, , Germany
St. Vinzenz-Hospital
Dinslaken, , Germany
Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, , Germany
Lubinus Clinicum Kiel
Kiel, , Germany
DRK Krankenhaus Luckenwalde
Luckenwalde, , Germany
Orthopädisch-Unfallchirurgisches Zentrum
Mannheim, , Germany
Orthopädiezentrum München Ost
München, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hoburg A, Niemeyer P, Laute V, Zinser W, John T, Becher C, Izadpanah K, Diehl P, Kolombe T, Fay J, Siebold R, Fickert S. Safety and Efficacy of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation With Spheroids for Patellofemoral or Tibiofemoral Defects: A 5-Year Follow-up of a Phase 2, Dose-Confirmation Trial. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jan 18;10(1):23259671211053380. doi: 10.1177/23259671211053380. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Becher C, Laute V, Fickert S, Zinser W, Niemeyer P, John T, Diehl P, Kolombe T, Siebold R, Fay J. Safety of three different product doses in autologous chondrocyte implantation: results of a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 May 12;12(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0570-7.
Niemeyer P, Laute V, John T, Becher C, Diehl P, Kolombe T, Fay J, Siebold R, Niks M, Fickert S, Zinser W. The Effect of Cell Dose on the Early Magnetic Resonance Morphological Outcomes of Autologous Cell Implantation for Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):2005-14. doi: 10.1177/0363546516646092. Epub 2016 May 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-016816-20
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
cod 16HS14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.