A Comparison of JointRep® and Microfracture in Repair of Cartilage Lesions on the Femoral Condyle or Trochlea,
NCT ID: NCT04840147
Last Updated: 2024-03-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
185 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-22
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Arthroscopic Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Microfractures
NCT01947374
Superiority of MACI® Versus Microfracture Treatment in Patients With Symptomatic Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee
NCT00719576
NOVOCART®3D for Treatment of Articular Cartilage of the Knee
NCT01957722
Autologous Cartilage Implantation vs Arthroscopic Debridement
NCT02636881
Knee Articular Cartilage Debridement in Conjunction With Partial Meniscectomy
NCT00613535
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
JointRep® plus microfracture
JointRep®
JointRep® is a medical device based on a thermogel polymer (Chitosan) for the treatment of chondral lesions, which consists of an injectable aqueous composition that forms a solid and sticky hydrogel in situ within cartilage defect(s). JointRep® is composed of an injectable thermo-gelling aqueous composition. It is used in conjunction with a Bone Marrow Stimulation type of procedure like Microfracture.
Microfracture
Microfracture is a bone marrow stimulation type of procedure where after debridement of the damaged chondral tissue within the lesion, obtention of stable vertical margins and curettage of the entire calcified layer, multiple holes are created with a variety of instruments (awls, picks, microdills, nanofracture) to establish a communication with the subchondral bone to create a blood clot to elicit the natural healing process
Control
Microfracture alone
Microfracture
Microfracture is a bone marrow stimulation type of procedure where after debridement of the damaged chondral tissue within the lesion, obtention of stable vertical margins and curettage of the entire calcified layer, multiple holes are created with a variety of instruments (awls, picks, microdills, nanofracture) to establish a communication with the subchondral bone to create a blood clot to elicit the natural healing process
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
JointRep®
JointRep® is a medical device based on a thermogel polymer (Chitosan) for the treatment of chondral lesions, which consists of an injectable aqueous composition that forms a solid and sticky hydrogel in situ within cartilage defect(s). JointRep® is composed of an injectable thermo-gelling aqueous composition. It is used in conjunction with a Bone Marrow Stimulation type of procedure like Microfracture.
Microfracture
Microfracture is a bone marrow stimulation type of procedure where after debridement of the damaged chondral tissue within the lesion, obtention of stable vertical margins and curettage of the entire calcified layer, multiple holes are created with a variety of instruments (awls, picks, microdills, nanofracture) to establish a communication with the subchondral bone to create a blood clot to elicit the natural healing process
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have one or two focal articular cartilage lesion(s) (ICRS Grade 3 or 4A) on the femoral condyles or trochlea of the index knee; patellar tracking must be normal if the index lesion(s) is on the trochlea. Individually, a lesion can be between 1-7cm2. If more than one lesion is present, the sum of the two lesions should not exceed 10cm2.
* Within 6 months prior to treatment, have a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or arthroscopic confirmation of lesion(s) in the index knee.
* For patients older than 40 y.o, to have a radiological Kellgren and Lawrence (K\&L) grading from a standing knee radiograph taken less than 6 months previously, Grade 1 or
* If not, an actual test will be performed as part of the visit 1 procedures.
* Have a clinically stable knee, with no ligament deficiencies (\<5mm side-to-side difference on Lachman and varus/valgus stress testing \& Grade 0 or 1 on Pivot shift test) and the meniscal rims are intact (a maximum of 50% resection is allowed)
* Be able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate and have signed an Informed Consent Form specific to this study
* VAS pain great than or equal to 4 in the last week.
* Be willing and able to comply with all study procedures including all preoperative, post-operative and rehabilitation requirements
* If female and of child-bearing potential, must report double-barrier, contraceptive use (e.g. use of birth-control pill and condom) for at least 2 months prior to treatment and in the 12 months following treatment.
* If female and of child-bearing potential, have a negative pregnancy test prior to the surgical procedure and no intention of becoming pregnant in the 12 months following treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
* Have more than two lesions (ICRS grade 3 or 4A) on any surface in the index knee
* Have "kissing" or opposing lesion(s) (ICRS grade 3 or 4A) of the condyle, tibia or patella in the index knee; additional linear lesions which bear Grade 3 or 4 characteristics may be acceptable if they are determined by the Investigator to be incidental, not clinically relevant, and consistent with the subject demographic
* Have malalignment of \>5 degrees varus or valgus in the index knee based on standard AP x-rays requiring an osteotomy
* Have had any surgical treatment for cartilage repair in the index knee within 1 year prior to treatment
* Have had intra-articular injections within 3 months in the index knee
* Have a diagnosis of a concomitant knee injury which may confound assessment of the index knee (e.g., important meniscal injury)
* Have significant pain emanating from other lower body joints in the ipsilateral (hip, ankle) or contralateral (hip, knee, ankle) limb.
* Have known allergies to shellfish
* Have a known history of crystalloid or inflammatory arthropathy
* Have any condition that is unrelated to the index knee and significantly impairs walking ability (e.g., spinal stenosis, sciatica)
* Have advanced musculoskeletal disease
* Have active coagulation disorders
* Are currently using antibiotics
* Are participating concurrently in another clinical investigation, or have participated in a clinical investigation within the last 90 days, or intend to participate in another clinical investigation during the course of the study
* Are currently abusing drugs or alcohol or have a history of the same within the last 12 months
* Have any mental or psychological disorder that would impair their ability to complete the study questionnaires
* Are currently breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed any time during the course of the study
* Are currently a prisoner
* Have significant comorbidities or conditions associated with high-risk for surgical or anesthetic survival (e.g., renal failure, peripheral vascular disease, unstable cardiac disease, poorly controlled diabetes, immunosuppression, etc.)
* Have any medical condition or other circumstances, in the judgment of the investigator, that might interfere with the ability to return for follow-up visits, including any systemic illness, neuromuscular, neurosensory, or musculoskeletal deficiency that would render the subject unable to perform appropriate post-operative rehabilitation
* Have any condition which, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude adequate evaluation of the device's safety and performance
Subjects who meet any of the following intra-operative screening criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
* Have lesion(s) in the index knee that are not contained (intact shoulders) and/or exceed 7 cm² in total size after debridement for a single lesion and 10cm2 for more than one lesion, if within the same condyle or the trochlea. If only a single lesion suitable to be included is identified, it might be between 1-7cm2.
* Minor concomitant procedures are allowed such as, but not limited to:
1. Removal of loose bodies
2. Plica excision
3. Minor synovial removing
4. Minor chondroplasty (debridement)
5. Lysis of adhesions
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mobius Medical Pty Ltd.
INDUSTRY
Oligo Medic Pty Ltd
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bruce Caldwell, MBBS, FRACS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lingard Private Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Canberra Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
Deakin, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Sydney Knee Specialists
Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
Lingard Private Hospital
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Orthosports
Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
Cairns Orthopaedic Clinic
Parramatta Park, Queensland, Australia
North Queensland Knee
Pimlico, Queensland, Australia
Melbourne Orthopedic Group
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Dartmouth General Hospital
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Mark Porter, MBBS, FRACS
Role: primary
Doron Sher, MBBS, FRACS
Role: primary
Ben Parkinson, MBBS, FRACS
Role: primary
Peter McEwen, MBBS, FRACS
Role: primary
Timothy Lording, MBBS, FRACS
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JR001PMAUS01-2020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.