Efficacy and Safety of Viaskin Peanut in Children With Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-Mediated Peanut Allergy
NCT ID: NCT02636699
Last Updated: 2025-06-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
500 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-31
2017-08-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Efficacy Study of Viaskin Peanut in Peanut-allergic Children 4-7 Years of Age
NCT05741476
Safety of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Peanut Allergy
NCT01170286
Expanded Access Protocol of Viaskin® Peanut (DBV712) in Peanut-allergic Children
NCT05424731
A Safety and Efficacy Study of PVX108 in Children and Adolescents With Peanut Allergy
NCT05621317
Peanut Epicutaneous Phase II Immunotherapy Clinical Trial
NCT01904604
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The overall maximum study duration for each subject is approximately 61 weeks (6-week screening period, 12-month treatment period and 2-week follow-up period).
During the screening period, subjects will undergo a first screening visit and an entry double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) to peanut to confirm their allergy and their entry peanut eliciting dose (ED). The starting dose of the challenge will be 1 mg peanut protein and will escalate up to a highest dose of 300mg peanut protein. Subjects who react at or below the dose of 300mg peanut protein are considered eligible.
Randomization of eligible subjects will occur in a 2:1 ratio to Viaskin Peanut dosed at 250µg peanut protein (active treatment) or placebo. Subjects will be stratified at randomization by their entry/screening DBPCFC ED in 1 of the following 2 strata and by study center:
* Stratum 1: children with a screening ED of 1mg, 3mg or 10mg;
* Stratum 2: children with a screening ED of 30mg, 100mg or 300mg.
Subjects will apply a Viaskin patch containing either peanut protein or placebo daily for a period of 12 months. At Month 12, a post-treatment DBPCFC to peanut will be performed, with a starting dose of 1 mg peanut protein with escalation up to a highest dose of 2,000 mg peanut protein. This evaluation will help determine the primary efficacy endpoint of this pivotal study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Viaskin Peanut 250mcg
One Viaskin epicutaneous delivery system (patch) containing 250 µg of peanut protein applied on the skin for 24 hours (±4 hours of allowance) daily for a period of 12 months.
Viaskin Peanut 250mcg
Peanut extract cutaneous patch
Placebo
One Viaskin epicutaneous delivery system (patch) containing placebo applied on the skin for 24 hours (±4 hours of allowance) daily for a period of 12 months.
Placebo
Cutaneous patch containing an inactive deposit manufactured to mimic peanut extract
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Viaskin Peanut 250mcg
Peanut extract cutaneous patch
Placebo
Cutaneous patch containing an inactive deposit manufactured to mimic peanut extract
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Physician-diagnosis of peanut allergy or children with a well documented medical history of IgE-mediated symptoms after ingestion of peanut and currently following a strict peanut-free diet, but without a physician diagnosis;
3. Peanut-specific IgE level (ImmunoCAP system) \>0.7 kU/L;
4. Positive peanut skin prick test (SPT) with a largest wheal diameter:
* ≥6 mm for children 4 through 5 years of age at Visit 1,
* ≥8 mm for children 6 years and above at Visit 1;
5. Positive DBPCFC at ≤300 mg peanut protein.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Generalized dermatologic disease
3. Diagnosis of mast cell disorders, including mastocytosis or uricaria pigmentosa as well as hereditary or idiopathic angioedema;
4. Diagnosis of asthma that fulfills any of the following criteria:
* Uncontrolled persistent asthma as defined by National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Asthma guidelines 2007 or by Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines 2015,
* Asthma treated with either a high daily high dose of inhaled corticosteroid or with a combination therapy of a medium or high daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid with a long acting inhaled β2 agonist or with a combination therapy of a high daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid with a long acting inhaled β2 agonist. Asthmatic subjects treated with a medium daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids are eligible. Intermittent asthmatic subjects who require intermittent use of inhaled corticosteroids for rescue are also eligible,
* Two or more systemic corticosteroid courses for asthma in the past year or 1 oral corticosteroid course for asthma within 3 months prior to Visit 1, or during screening period,
* Prior intubation/mechanical ventilation for asthma within 1 year prior to Visit 1, or during screening;
5. Receiving β-blocking agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers or tricyclic antidepressant therapy;
6. Received anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs or anti-IgE drugs (such as omalizumab) or any biologic immunomodulatory therapy within 1 year prior to Visit 1, during screening period or during study participation;
7. Use of systemic long-acting corticosteroids within 12 weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or use of systemic short-acting corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 or during screening;
8. Prior or concomitant history of any immunotherapy to any food;
9. Receiving or planning to receive any aeroallergen immunotherapy during their participation in the study. Aeroallergen immunotherapy must be discontinued at the time of Visit 1;
10. Any disorder in which epinephrine is contraindicated such as coronary artery disease, uncontrolled hypertension, or serious ventricular arrhythmias.
4 Years
11 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
DBV Technologies
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David M Fleischer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospital Colorado
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
University of California, Rady Children's Hospital
San Diego, California, United States
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, United States
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
National Jewish Health
Denver, Colorado, United States
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Boston Childrens' Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Jaffe Food Allergy Institute
New York, New York, United States
The University of North Carolina - Chapell Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Children's Medical Center of Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
Baylor College of Medicine - Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
ASTHMA, Inc.
Seattle, Washington, United States
Allergy Medical
Brisbane, , Australia
Princess Margaret Hospital for Children
Perth, , Australia
Children's Hospital Westmead
Sydney, , Australia
British Columbia Children's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Cheema Research Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Allergy Asthma Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Gordon Sussman Clinical Research Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
CHUM & CHU Sainte-Justine
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Centre de Recherche Appliquée en Allergie de Québec (CRAAQ)
Québec, , Canada
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, , Germany
St.-Marien-Hospital
Bonn, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, , Germany
Clinical Investigations Unit
Cork, , Ireland
Our Lady's Children's Hospital
Dublin, , Ireland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fleischer DM, Greenhawt M, Sussman G, Begin P, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Petroni D, Beyer K, Brown-Whitehorn T, Hebert J, Hourihane JO, Campbell DE, Leonard S, Chinthrajah RS, Pongracic JA, Jones SM, Lange L, Chong H, Green TD, Wood R, Cheema A, Prescott SL, Smith P, Yang W, Chan ES, Byrne A, Assa'ad A, Bird JA, Kim EH, Schneider L, Davis CM, Lanser BJ, Lambert R, Shreffler W. Effect of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy vs Placebo on Reaction to Peanut Protein Ingestion Among Children With Peanut Allergy: The PEPITES Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Mar 12;321(10):946-955. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1113.
Greenhawt M, Kim EH, Campbell DE, Green TD, Lambert R, Fleischer DM. Improvements in eliciting dose across baseline sensitivities following 12 months of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) in peanut-allergic children aged 4 to 11 years. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9):3219-3221. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.05.030. Epub 2020 Jun 2. No abstract available.
Remington BC, Campbell DE, Green TD, Fleischer DM, Koppelman SJ. Post hoc analysis of epicutaneous immunotherapy for peanut allergy phase 3 results: Relevance for exposure through restaurant meals. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Feb;126(2):208-209. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.11.015. Epub 2020 Nov 28. No abstract available.
Remington BC, Krone T, Kim EH, Bird JA, Green TD, Lack G, Fleischer DM, Koppelman SJ. Estimated risk reduction to packaged food reactions by epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) for peanut allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Nov;123(5):488-493.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PEPITES
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.