Efficacy and Safety of Viaskin Peanut in Children With Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-Mediated Peanut Allergy

NCT ID: NCT02636699

Last Updated: 2025-06-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-08-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The PEPITES study evaluates the efficacy and safety of Viaskin Peanut 250 µg peanut protein to induce desensitization to peanut in peanut-allergic children 4 through 11 years of age after a 12-month treatment by epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a 12-month, Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to assess the efficacy and safety of Viaskin Peanut, dosed at 250µg peanut protein (per patch) in peanut-allergic children from 4 through 11 years of age.

The overall maximum study duration for each subject is approximately 61 weeks (6-week screening period, 12-month treatment period and 2-week follow-up period).

During the screening period, subjects will undergo a first screening visit and an entry double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) to peanut to confirm their allergy and their entry peanut eliciting dose (ED). The starting dose of the challenge will be 1 mg peanut protein and will escalate up to a highest dose of 300mg peanut protein. Subjects who react at or below the dose of 300mg peanut protein are considered eligible.

Randomization of eligible subjects will occur in a 2:1 ratio to Viaskin Peanut dosed at 250µg peanut protein (active treatment) or placebo. Subjects will be stratified at randomization by their entry/screening DBPCFC ED in 1 of the following 2 strata and by study center:

* Stratum 1: children with a screening ED of 1mg, 3mg or 10mg;
* Stratum 2: children with a screening ED of 30mg, 100mg or 300mg.

Subjects will apply a Viaskin patch containing either peanut protein or placebo daily for a period of 12 months. At Month 12, a post-treatment DBPCFC to peanut will be performed, with a starting dose of 1 mg peanut protein with escalation up to a highest dose of 2,000 mg peanut protein. This evaluation will help determine the primary efficacy endpoint of this pivotal study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peanut Allergy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Viaskin Peanut 250mcg

One Viaskin epicutaneous delivery system (patch) containing 250 µg of peanut protein applied on the skin for 24 hours (±4 hours of allowance) daily for a period of 12 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Viaskin Peanut 250mcg

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Peanut extract cutaneous patch

Placebo

One Viaskin epicutaneous delivery system (patch) containing placebo applied on the skin for 24 hours (±4 hours of allowance) daily for a period of 12 months.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Cutaneous patch containing an inactive deposit manufactured to mimic peanut extract

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Viaskin Peanut 250mcg

Peanut extract cutaneous patch

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo

Cutaneous patch containing an inactive deposit manufactured to mimic peanut extract

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DBV712

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female children aged 4 through 11 years;
2. Physician-diagnosis of peanut allergy or children with a well documented medical history of IgE-mediated symptoms after ingestion of peanut and currently following a strict peanut-free diet, but without a physician diagnosis;
3. Peanut-specific IgE level (ImmunoCAP system) \>0.7 kU/L;
4. Positive peanut skin prick test (SPT) with a largest wheal diameter:

* ≥6 mm for children 4 through 5 years of age at Visit 1,
* ≥8 mm for children 6 years and above at Visit 1;
5. Positive DBPCFC at ≤300 mg peanut protein.

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of severe anaphylaxis to peanut with any of the following symptoms: hypotension, hypoxia, neurological compromise (collapse, loss of consciousness or incontinence);
2. Generalized dermatologic disease
3. Diagnosis of mast cell disorders, including mastocytosis or uricaria pigmentosa as well as hereditary or idiopathic angioedema;
4. Diagnosis of asthma that fulfills any of the following criteria:

* Uncontrolled persistent asthma as defined by National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Asthma guidelines 2007 or by Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines 2015,
* Asthma treated with either a high daily high dose of inhaled corticosteroid or with a combination therapy of a medium or high daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid with a long acting inhaled β2 agonist or with a combination therapy of a high daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid with a long acting inhaled β2 agonist. Asthmatic subjects treated with a medium daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids are eligible. Intermittent asthmatic subjects who require intermittent use of inhaled corticosteroids for rescue are also eligible,
* Two or more systemic corticosteroid courses for asthma in the past year or 1 oral corticosteroid course for asthma within 3 months prior to Visit 1, or during screening period,
* Prior intubation/mechanical ventilation for asthma within 1 year prior to Visit 1, or during screening;
5. Receiving β-blocking agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers or tricyclic antidepressant therapy;
6. Received anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs or anti-IgE drugs (such as omalizumab) or any biologic immunomodulatory therapy within 1 year prior to Visit 1, during screening period or during study participation;
7. Use of systemic long-acting corticosteroids within 12 weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or use of systemic short-acting corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 or during screening;
8. Prior or concomitant history of any immunotherapy to any food;
9. Receiving or planning to receive any aeroallergen immunotherapy during their participation in the study. Aeroallergen immunotherapy must be discontinued at the time of Visit 1;
10. Any disorder in which epinephrine is contraindicated such as coronary artery disease, uncontrolled hypertension, or serious ventricular arrhythmias.
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

11 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

DBV Technologies

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David M Fleischer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital Colorado

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Arkansas Children's Hospital

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

University of California, Rady Children's Hospital

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University School of Medicine

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

National Jewish Health

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Boston Childrens' Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Jaffe Food Allergy Institute

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

The University of North Carolina - Chapell Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Children's Medical Center of Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor College of Medicine - Texas Children's Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

ASTHMA, Inc.

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Allergy Medical

Brisbane, , Australia

Site Status

Princess Margaret Hospital for Children

Perth, , Australia

Site Status

Children's Hospital Westmead

Sydney, , Australia

Site Status

British Columbia Children's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Cheema Research Inc.

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Allergy Asthma Research Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Gordon Sussman Clinical Research Inc.

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

CHUM & CHU Sainte-Justine

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre de Recherche Appliquée en Allergie de Québec (CRAAQ)

Québec, , Canada

Site Status

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

St.-Marien-Hospital

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Investigations Unit

Cork, , Ireland

Site Status

Our Lady's Children's Hospital

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada Germany Ireland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fleischer DM, Greenhawt M, Sussman G, Begin P, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Petroni D, Beyer K, Brown-Whitehorn T, Hebert J, Hourihane JO, Campbell DE, Leonard S, Chinthrajah RS, Pongracic JA, Jones SM, Lange L, Chong H, Green TD, Wood R, Cheema A, Prescott SL, Smith P, Yang W, Chan ES, Byrne A, Assa'ad A, Bird JA, Kim EH, Schneider L, Davis CM, Lanser BJ, Lambert R, Shreffler W. Effect of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy vs Placebo on Reaction to Peanut Protein Ingestion Among Children With Peanut Allergy: The PEPITES Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Mar 12;321(10):946-955. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1113.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30794314 (View on PubMed)

Greenhawt M, Kim EH, Campbell DE, Green TD, Lambert R, Fleischer DM. Improvements in eliciting dose across baseline sensitivities following 12 months of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) in peanut-allergic children aged 4 to 11 years. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9):3219-3221. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.05.030. Epub 2020 Jun 2. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32502548 (View on PubMed)

Remington BC, Campbell DE, Green TD, Fleischer DM, Koppelman SJ. Post hoc analysis of epicutaneous immunotherapy for peanut allergy phase 3 results: Relevance for exposure through restaurant meals. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Feb;126(2):208-209. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.11.015. Epub 2020 Nov 28. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33259921 (View on PubMed)

Remington BC, Krone T, Kim EH, Bird JA, Green TD, Lack G, Fleischer DM, Koppelman SJ. Estimated risk reduction to packaged food reactions by epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) for peanut allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Nov;123(5):488-493.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31442495 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PEPITES

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy of Tezepelumab in Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
NCT07015996 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2
Peanut Oral Immunotherapy in Children
NCT01867671 COMPLETED PHASE2
HAL-MPE1 Safety and Tolerability Study
NCT02991885 COMPLETED PHASE1
Salvage Peanut Oral Immunotherapy Study
NCT03251508 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Pinpoint Trial: Prebiotics IN Peanut Oral ImmunoTherapy
NCT05138757 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Oral Peanut Immunotherapy
NCT01324401 COMPLETED NA