The Safety and Efficacy of a Peanut Immunotherapy Dissolving Film for Peanut Allergy

NCT ID: NCT01897077

Last Updated: 2018-07-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-11-30

Study Completion Date

2013-02-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if a new method of administration of peanut sublingual immunotherapy, a dissolving peanut film, is effective.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Peanut allergy is a common problem with no current treatment. Recent studies have shown some success with oral or sublingual immunotherapy for the treatment of food allergy. Oral treatment, which requires very high doses, is associated with a small but appreciable risk of systemic reactions. Sublingual immunotherapy, which utilizes much smaller doses, is safer but constraints inherent in the available methods of sublingual administration have limited the utility of this method. Typically sublingual immunotherapy for food allergy has used either fresh foods or a simple liquid extract. These methods are not optimized for practicality or dwell duration in the mouth, and, thus far, dosing has been limited by the ability to make concentrated extracts and by the volume of extract that can be applied to the sublingual space. This study is being conducted to determine if a dissolving peanut extract film, will improve efficacy for immunotherapy for peanut allergy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peanut Allergy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Peanut Allergic

Only one intervention will be given. Peanut allergic study subjects, will receive gradually increasing doses of the dissolving peanut film.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Peanut Dissolving Film

Intervention Type DRUG

Healthy Volunteers

Healthy volunteers will receive active peanut dissolving films in an expedited manner in order to determine safety dissolving films.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Peanut Dissolving Film

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Peanut Dissolving Film

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 to 50 years
* Provide signed informed consent
* Using appropriate birth control if subject is female and of child bearing age
* Are available for the study duration

Healthy Volunteers Only

* Regularly consume a meal sized portion (5 grams) of peanut at least twice per month during the proceeding 6 months

Peanut Allergic Subjects Only

* Have a history of symptomatic reactivity to peanut
* Have a positive skin prick test
* Have a positive oral food challenge to peanut at a cumulative dose of less than 1 grams of peanut protein
* Have self-injectable epinephrine available at home

Exclusion Criteria

* Have a history of severe anaphylaxis to peanut, defined as hypoxia, hypotension or neurological compromise as a result of ingestion of peanut.
* Have a history of intubation related to asthma
* Are pregnant or lactating
* Have a viral Upper Respiratory Infection (URI) or gastroenteritis within 7 days of Oral food challenge
* Have pulmonary function tests \<80% of predicted (FEV1) or clinical history consistent with more than moderate persistent asthma
* Are currently taking greater than medium dose inhaled corticosteroid (\>500 mcg/day fluticasone or fluticasone equivalent)
* Are unable to discontinue antihistamines for 5 days for long acting and 3 days for short acting prior to skin testing or food challenges
* Have used systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to baseline visit
* Are receiving omalizumab, beta-blocker, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or tricyclic antidepressant therapy. Subjects need to be off omalizumab for 6 months.
* Have history of oral cancer.
* Use oral tobacco (i.e., chew tobacco)
* Have a chronic disease (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis or rhinitis) requiring therapy (e.g., heart disease, diabetes)
* Have participated in any interventional study for treatment of a food allergy in the past 12 months
* Have a history of eosinophilic esophagitis
* Have a severe reaction at initial double blind placebo-controlled food challenge, defined as either:

* Life-threatening anaphylaxis, or
* Reaction requiring hospitalization

Healthy Volunteers Only

* History of any allergy to peanut
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert Wood, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Corinne Keet, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Hugh Sampson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NA_00042409

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Oral Peanut Immunotherapy
NCT01324401 COMPLETED NA
HAL-MPE1 Safety and Tolerability Study
NCT02991885 COMPLETED PHASE1
Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
NCT00429429 COMPLETED NA
Salvage Peanut Oral Immunotherapy Study
NCT03251508 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Efficacy of Tezepelumab in Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
NCT07015996 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2
Study of ENP-501 in Peanut-Allergic and Non-Allergic Participants
NCT07117669 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2