A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Peanut Sublingual Immunotherapy Trial
NCT ID: NCT00580606
Last Updated: 2019-08-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-12-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study of Sublingual/Oral Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Peanut Allergy
NCT01084174
Oral Peanut Immunotherapy
NCT01324401
Peanut Oral Immunotherapy in Children
NCT01867671
Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
NCT00429429
Salvage Peanut Oral Immunotherapy Study
NCT03251508
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This clinical trial will last 172 to 216 weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive peanut SLIT or placebo SLIT. All participants will have an entry oral food challenge (OFC). The treatment group will receive gradual dosing escalations of peanut SLIT and maintenance therapy over a 44-week period, followed by another OFC. Following the OFC, participants will be unblinded, and the placebo group will receive peanut SLIT escalated to a higher maximum dose than the first treatment group. Maintenance therapy will continue for both groups for more than 2 years.
Study visits will occur every 2 weeks during dosing escalations of peanut SLIT, followed by visits gradually spacing out during maintenance to every 12 weeks. At selected visits, a physical examination, skin prick tests, blood and urine collection, and atopic dermatitis and asthma evaluations will occur. Approximately 6 OFCs will be administered to each participant throughout the course of the study. Additionally, 10 participants will be enrolled as control participants who will not receive any study therapy and will only have blood drawn at 3 visits throughout the course of the trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low Dose Peanut SLIT (Double Blind to Open Label)
Subjects ingest peanut protein (glycerinated peanut allergenic extract) daily starting with 0.000165 mcg, followed by a build-up phase (escalating peanut doses every 2 weeks, achieving maintenance dose by 36 weeks). Thereafter, subjects are on a maximally tolerated maintenance dose (165 mcg to 1,386 mcg) for \>= 8 weeks. After Week 44, subjects are given a 5,000 mg Oral Food Challenge (OFC) using peanut powder. Subjects/study staff are unblinded following this OFC and continue on an open label peanut protein maintenance dose of 1,386 mcg/day or may attempt escalation up to this dose. Subjects who at the Week 116 OFC are unable to consume \>= 5,000 mg peanut powder or 10-fold the amount of peanut powder compared to the baseline OFC will discontinue study therapy. SLIT=Sublingual Immunotherapy.
Glycerinated peanut allergenic extract
Glycerinated peanut extract delivered sublingually.
Placebo (DB) Crossed Over to High Dose Peanut SLIT (OL)
Subjects ingest placebo (glycerin) daily beginning with a dose of 0.000165 mcg, followed by a build-up phase (escalating placebo doses every 2 weeks, achieving a maintenance dose by 36 weeks). Thereafter, subjects are on a maximally tolerated maintenance dose (165 mcg to 1,386 mcg) for \>= 8 weeks. After Week 44, subjects are given a 5,000 mg Oral Food Challenge (OFC) using peanut powder. Subjects/study staff are unblinded following this OFC and subjects no longer receive placebo dosing but are crossed over and receive open label high dose peanut SLIT; the study procedures and schedule are the same as for the Low Dose Peanut SLIT group, the only difference is the maximum maintenance dose is almost 3-fold higher at 3,696 mcg/day. DB=Double Blind, SLIT=Sublingual Immunotherapy, OL=Open Label.
Placebo for peanut extract (glycerin)
Placebo (glycerin) delivered sublingually.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Glycerinated peanut allergenic extract
Glycerinated peanut extract delivered sublingually.
Placebo for peanut extract (glycerin)
Placebo (glycerin) delivered sublingually.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Reacts to a cumulative dose of 2,000 mg or less of peanut powder
* Positive peanut allergy skin prick test OR detectable serum peanut-specific IgE level
* Willing to use an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of the study
* Ability to perform spirometry maneuver in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guidelines
Exclusion Criteria
* Currently participating in a study using a new investigational new drug
* Participation in any interventional study for the treatment of food allergy in the 12 months prior to study entry
* Allergic to placebo ingredients (glycerin or oat flour) OR reacts to any dose of placebo during study entry oral food challenge (OFC)
* Currently in a buildup phase of any allergy immunotherapy
* Poor control of atopic dermatitis
* Moderate or severe asthma despite therapy
* Current treatment with greater than medium daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids
* Use of steroid medications
* Use of omalizumab or other nontraditional forms of allergen immunomodulatory therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy in the 12 months prior to study entry
* Use of beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, or calcium channel blockers
* Inability to discontinue antihistamines for skin testing and OFCs
* History of ischemic cardiovascular disease
* History of alcohol or drug abuse
* Other significant medical conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent participation in the study
* Previous intubation due to allergies or asthma
* Uncontrolled high blood pressure
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
12 Years
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Consortium of Food Allergy Research
OTHER
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wesley Burks, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Duke University
David Fleischer, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
National Jewish Health
Hugh A. Sampson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Stacie Jones, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute
Robert Wood, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Arkansas
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
National Jewish Medical and Research Center
Denver, Colorado, United States
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, United States
University of North Carolina
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
de Leon MP, Rolland JM, O'Hehir RE. The peanut allergy epidemic: allergen molecular characterisation and prospects for specific therapy. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2007 Jan 9;9(1):1-18. doi: 10.1017/S1462399407000208.
Enrique E, Cistero-Bahima A. Specific immunotherapy for food allergy: basic principles and clinical aspects. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Dec;6(6):466-9. doi: 10.1097/01.all.0000246618.41871.a4.
Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. Peanut allergy: emerging concepts and approaches for an apparent epidemic. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Sep;120(3):491-503; quiz 504-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.07.015. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
Fleischer DM, Burks AW, Vickery BP, Scurlock AM, Wood RA, Jones SM, Sicherer SH, Liu AH, Stablein D, Henning AK, Mayer L, Lindblad R, Plaut M, Sampson HA; Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR). Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Jan;131(1):119-27.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.11.011.
Burks AW, Wood RA, Jones SM, Sicherer SH, Fleischer DM, Scurlock AM, Vickery BP, Liu AH, Henning AK, Lindblad R, Dawson P, Plaut M, Sampson HA; Consortium of Food Allergy Research. Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: Long-term follow-up of a randomized multicenter trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 May;135(5):1240-8.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.12.1917. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Main Areas of Focus: Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DAIT CoFAR4
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.