Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-01
2017-10-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Novel Method of Non-invasive Ventilation in Children
NCT01394172
Effects of Sternal Wall Pressure in Children
NCT00628407
Pilot Study to Evaluate Doses of Mechanical Stimulus on the Effectiveness of Preterm Breathing
NCT06639581
Use of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Compared to Nasal Prong Oxygen or Humidified High Flow in Children Under Five With Severe Pneumonia and Hypoxaemia
NCT01396759
CPAP Or Nasal Cannula Oxygen for Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04792099
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We previously demonstrated that application of gentle pressure on the right chest of pediatric patients generated 20% of the tidal volume achieved with mechanical ventilation, regardless of whether the patient was intubated or not. Chest pressure was monitored using a force transducer and did not exceed the patient's body weight. Indeed, the pressure used was considerably less than what would be administered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. There was little variation across age ranges; for each age group, we observed a difference of less than 1 mL/kg compared to the overall mean tidal volume. Our study also showed that the gentle chest pressure technique was well-tolerated by pediatric patients of any age (neonate to adolescent), and no adverse events were encountered, supporting this technique as a very low-risk maneuver.
While these results are encouraging, the study did not provide detailed information on how much peripheral oxygenation (SpO2) is achieved with the gentle chest pressure technique. An editorial that accompanied the published study supports further investigation of the technique, including the extent to which it provides ventilation and its ability to provide adequate oxygenation. In this study, we wish to perform the technique on pediatric patients to determine if it can be used to maintain SpO2 for a significant length of time. For safety purposes, all trials will be done on patients whose tracheae have been intubated.
OBJECTIVE To determine if a gentle chest pressure technique can be used to maintain SpO2 over 90% significantly longer than allowing SpO2 to desaturate spontaneously.
HYPOTHESIS Gentle chest pressure can maintain SpO2 over 90% for significantly longer than if tissues are allowed to desaturate spontaneously.
METHODS After obtaining ethics approval, informed consent with or without assent whenever is appropriate (usually above the age of 6 years) will be obtained on the day ward. Consent will be obtained by a research assistant not involved with the clinical care of the patient. The demographic details of the patients, such as age, weight, height, ASA and any medical conditions will be recorded. The patient will be taken into the operating room, and routine monitoring will be applied. After induction of a standard general anesthesia where the technique is at the discretion of each individual anesthesiologist responsible for the case, the patient's trachea will be intubated. The patient will be ventilated mechanically for two minutes to achieve 100% peripheral oxygen saturation.
During this time, the patient will be randomly allocated to one of two groups - intervention and control - by a member of the study team. Instructions in sealed envelopes will indicate whether the chest pressure technique will be used or not. For patients in the intervention group, the anesthesiologist will apply gentle pressure (not exceeding the patient's own weight) vertically down on the patient's right chest. In the previous study, we calibrated pressure using a force transducer; since then, the Stollery pediatric anesthesia staff has been employing the technique in regular practice and are well experienced with the amount of force needed to generate adequate tidal volume. Since a pre-defined distance to depress the chest (e.g., 1 or 2 cm) is difficult to use for a wide range of patients weights (approximately 9-67 kg range in the previous study), in this study, the anesthesiologist will apply pressure to the point where resistance is encountered and then release. Upon release of pressure, the anesthesiologist will wait for one second. In our experience, the time taken to apply downward pressure and allow for chest recoil lasts approximately four seconds which, with the one second pause following pressure release, creates a total time of 5 seconds for the entire maneuver. As such, the maneuver can be used to achieve 12 breaths per minute. Oxygen saturation will be monitored and recorded continuously. The time taken for SpO2 levels to fall to 90% will be recorded, at which point, the anesthesiologist will restart mechanical ventilation. If SpO2 values fall below 90% at any time while the chest pressure technique is being performed, the patient can be ventilated mechanically immediately because they are already intubated.
Patients randomized to the control group will receive the same care as the intervention group except that no chest pressure technique will be performed. Following mechanical ventilation to 100% SpO2, surgery will proceed as normal with no additional intervention (i.e., gentle chest pressure) by the anesthesiologist. Peripheral oxygen saturations will be monitored during this time, and once the level reaches 90%, the time will be recorded, and the anesthesiologist will restart mechanical ventilation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
No interventions assigned to this group
Study group
Gentle chest pressure
Gentle pressure on the patient's right chest will be applied to achieve 12 breaths per minute.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gentle chest pressure
Gentle pressure on the patient's right chest will be applied to achieve 12 breaths per minute.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Requirement for insertion of an endotracheal tube
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to III
Exclusion Criteria
* ASA IV
* Patients with any cardiac pathology
* Patients with any respiratory pathology
* Patients with any form of chest deformity, for example, pectus excavatum, pectus carinatum, scoliosis
* Patients who had previous cardiac or thoracic surgery
1 Year
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alberta
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tsui BC, Horne S, Tsui J, Corry GN. Generation of tidal volume via gentle chest pressure in children over one year old. Resuscitation. 2015 Jul;92:148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.021. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
Morgan RW, Nadkarni VM, Berg RA. Can gentle chest compressions result in substantial ventilation? Resuscitation. 2015 Jul;92:A2-3. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 29. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00060292
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.