Pilot Study to Evaluate Doses of Mechanical Stimulus on the Effectiveness of Preterm Breathing

NCT ID: NCT06639581

Last Updated: 2024-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-10

Study Completion Date

2024-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare, in healthy preterm babies, 9 doses of dorsal mechanical stimuli, in order to answer:

* if there is a dose of dorsal mechanical stimuli that improves the basal respiration.

Participants will be stimulated through a cotton shirt for one minute with each dose, while respiratory measures will be taken through a nasobuccal mask, slightly tightened by the investigator staff. All time, babies are going to be monitored and assessing that they are comfortable.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Apnea of Prematurity (AOP) occurs in 90% of infants born at ≤34 weeks of gestation. Despite current treatments, these infants continue to experience intermittent hypoxia (IH) events, which lead to subsequent complications. Dorsal and extremity kinesthetic stimulation-commonly practiced in patients experiencing apnea-has been shown to trigger the infant's own respiratory effort. Several clinical studies have demonstrated that mechanized or reactive stimulation, performed with various devices and at different intensities, decreases the number of apneas and reduces the time spent with oxygen saturation levels below 90%, a measure of IH. However, there are also reports of no favorable effects with certain other stimulation mechanisms.

To study the kinesthetic mechanism, a pilot study was conducted on 10 healthy premature infants. The infants were dorsally stimulated using a surgical glove inflated by a mechanical ventilator at rates of 20 and 40 cycles per minute, applying a standardized stimulus independent of weight and gestational age. The main results showed that, during the stimulation period, the respiratory rate decreased by 19-50% compared to baseline (without stimulation), while oxygen saturation increased by 2-7 percentage points. Additionally, it was observed that synchronization of breathing with the dorsal stimulus occurred 0-77% of the time.

These observations could be explained by the assumption that premature infants achieved more effective breaths through stimulation, recruiting more alveolar units, and potentially triggering the Hering-Breuer reflex, which inhibits subsequent respiratory efforts. Although these findings were statistically significant based on the analysis of paired sample means, not all infants responded in the same way.

Method: A pilot study involving 10 healthy preterm infants (24-34 weeks gestational age) will be conducted. The infants will be stimulated on their backs with different combinations of lifting (3, 5, and 8 mm) and frequency (20, 30, and 40 cycles per minute) using a shirt equipped with an inflating-deflating actuator. The main outcome will be a comparison of minute ventilation and tidal volumes at baseline and with the different stimulation doses. The software "Rec Trial" will be used to record vital signs, operational settings, respiratory volumes, and patterns for repeated measures ANOVA analysis. The expected results are to find the optimal combination of lifting and frequency stimulus to optimize minute ventilation and/or detect relevant respiratory patterns that improve minute ventilation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Apnea of Prematurity Intermittent Hypoxia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

A baseline evaluation will be carried out and with the 9 doses of dorsal stimulation resulting from the combination of displacements of 3-5 -8 mm and 20-30-40 cycles per minute, randomized and performed by 2 operators each.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
All the data is going to be registered by Rec Trial Software, anonimize and blind to everybody

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3mm lifting stimulus

Respiratory volume measures, vital signs and respiratory mechanics will be evaluated in 10 healthy preterm, by dorsal stimulation causing a displacement of 3 mm , performed by 2 operators .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

20 per minute stimulus

Intervention Type DEVICE

crossover randomized mechanical dorsal stimuli -for one minute each- at 20-rates per minute

30 per minute stimulus

Intervention Type DEVICE

crossover randomized mechanical dorsal stimuli -for one minute each- at 30 rates per minute

40 per minute stimulus

Intervention Type DEVICE

crossover randomized mechanical dorsal stimuli -for one minute each- at 40 rates per minute

5mm lifting stimulus

Respiratory volume measures, vital signs and respiratory mechanics will be evaluated in 10 healthy preterm, by dorsal stimulation causing a displacement of 5 mm , performed by 2 operators .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

20 per minute stimulus

Intervention Type DEVICE

crossover randomized mechanical dorsal stimuli -for one minute each- at 20-rates per minute

30 per minute stimulus

Intervention Type DEVICE

crossover randomized mechanical dorsal stimuli -for one minute each- at 30 rates per minute

40 per minute stimulus

Intervention Type DEVICE

crossover randomized mechanical dorsal stimuli -for one minute each- at 40 rates per minute

8mm lifting stimulus

Respiratory volume measures, vital signs and respiratory mechanics will be evaluated in 10 healthy preterm, by dorsal stimulation causing a displacement of 8 mm , performed by 2 operators .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

20 per minute stimulus

Intervention Type DEVICE

crossover randomized mechanical dorsal stimuli -for one minute each- at 20-rates per minute

30 per minute stimulus

Intervention Type DEVICE

crossover randomized mechanical dorsal stimuli -for one minute each- at 30 rates per minute

40 per minute stimulus

Intervention Type DEVICE

crossover randomized mechanical dorsal stimuli -for one minute each- at 40 rates per minute

Basal

Respiratory volume measures, vital signs and respiratory mechanics will be evaluated in 10 healthy preterm basal- without stimulation- performed by 2 operators .

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

20 per minute stimulus

crossover randomized mechanical dorsal stimuli -for one minute each- at 20-rates per minute

Intervention Type DEVICE

30 per minute stimulus

crossover randomized mechanical dorsal stimuli -for one minute each- at 30 rates per minute

Intervention Type DEVICE

40 per minute stimulus

crossover randomized mechanical dorsal stimuli -for one minute each- at 40 rates per minute

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Paulina Toso

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paulina A Toso, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Puc, Nicu

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Chile

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

210406008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.