Efficacy of Percussive Ventilation Therapy (MetaNeb ®) Compared With Mucolytic Agents for Atelectasis in the Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Patient
NCT ID: NCT02168387
Last Updated: 2015-03-03
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
39 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-12-31
2012-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Methods to Improve Expiratory Cough Flow and Lung Volume in Children With NMDs
NCT02342132
Nebulized Hypertonic Saline for Mechanically Ventilated Children
NCT01945944
Pilot Study to Evaluate Doses of Mechanical Stimulus on the Effectiveness of Preterm Breathing
NCT06639581
Impact of Nebulized Dornase Alpha on Mechanically Ventilated Patients
NCT01095276
Effect of Closed Tracheal Aspiration Associated With Expiratory Pause in Pediatrics Randomized, Crossover Clinical Study
NCT05418530
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One of the problems with the medication approach is that while it thins out the mucus, actual removal from the lung requires a strong cough which is difficult for infants and children to produce when they are sedated and on a ventilator (breathing machine).
Thus, the aim of this research study is to test whether children with atelectasis on a ventilator are more likely to improve with mechanical removal of their mucus with the CHFO as compared with medications that thin out the mucus. CHFO and all the medications used in this study are part of the standard of care for atelectesis. However, there is no information on which combination works best and no one agrees that one approach is more effective than another. Usually patients are evaluated for 48 hours after starting treatment, before adding or making any changes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
continuous high frequency oscillator (CHFO)
Subjects randomized to receive therapy with the CHFO will receive a 20 minute treatment every 6 hours for 48 hours.
continuous high frequency oscillator (CHFO)
medication
Subjects randomized to receive the medications will receive acetylcysteine and dornase alfa, two medications frequently used in the treatment of atelectasis. The medications will alternate every 6 hours for 48 hours.
Acetylcysteine
dornase alfa
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
continuous high frequency oscillator (CHFO)
Acetylcysteine
dornase alfa
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age \< 18 years and admitted to the PICU or PCICU.
3. Conventionally ventilated.
4. Mucolytics are being initiated by clinical team for treatment of atelectasis.
5. Endotracheal tube ≥ 3.5 mm internal diameter.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Clinically significant pleural effusion.
3. Status post cardiothoracic surgery with open chest.
4. Pneumothorax.
5. Pulmonary hemorrhage.
6. Escalating doses of vasoactive agents (i.e. dopamine or epinephrine).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ira Cheifetz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00026503
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.