Continuous Versus Intermittent Bolus Feeding in Very Preterm Infants - Effect on Respiratory Morbidity

NCT ID: NCT03961139

Last Updated: 2020-01-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-03

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic Lung Disease (CLD) of Prematurity is a common yet challenging co-morbidity affecting extremely premature newborns. Multifactorial influences leading to this co-morbidity is known and targeted in various research studies. Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is common among the same cohort of patients. The investigators hypothesize that recurrent milk reflux into the airways of the premature babies worsen the inflammation of premature lungs and is a major contributor of CLD.

The investigators hypothesize that Continuous feeding (CF) minimises GER and micro-aspiration, thereby reducing the incidence and severity of CLD in high-risk infants.

Our aim is to compare the effect of intermittent bolus versus continuous intra-gastric feeding on the incidence and severity of CLD in very low birth weight infants ≤ 1250 grams.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The pathogenesis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is complex and multifactorial. As a result of premature birth, developmental arrest during a critical period of fetal lung development compounded by mechanical, oxidative and other injuries sustained during neonatal respiratory care forms the basis of pathogenesis. BPD affects up to 50% of infants with birth weight less than 1000 g. Between 2000 and 2009, despite advancement of neonatal care, annual BPD rates reported by Vermont Oxford Network among very low birth weight infants varied from 26.2% to 30.4% without any decline. Severely affected infants often require prolonged ventilation, high oxygen use, alternative airway and several potent medications over the first few months to years of their lives. High mortality rates, neurodevelopmental delay, respiratory morbidity and growth failure are associated with BPD.

Treatment of severe BPD with or without pulmonary hypertension is challenging. Prolonging the pregnancy in the face of premature labour, treating perinatal infections, augmenting pulmonary maturity with corticosteroids, judicious oxygen use, lung protective ventilation and optimizing nutrition to promote growth are important and well established measures to prevent or modify the progress of the chronic lung disease.

It is common to find infants with BPD also having significant symptoms of reflux. Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a well-known co-morbidity among preterms and ex-preterms on chronic ventilation, many of whom go on to require surgical fundoplication to stop the reflux thus preventing further lung damage. Some have reported dramatic respiratory improvement after resolution of GER. In the early days of a preterm baby with respiratory distress, GER is common and silent. Among infants, diagnosis of pathologic GER from a benign one is difficult. Many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) would investigate for GER only when faced with moderate to severe BPD to achieve better respiratory symptom control. However GER has not been studied well as a factor precipitating the development of BPD among VLBW neonates. This is the focus of the study.

Aspiration of gastric contents into the lung is a widespread phenomenon in mechanically ventilated preterm infants. In animal models of gastric aspiration, gastric particulates altered the pulmonary mechanics, increased pulmonary inflammatory cells, released pro-inflammatory mediators, and inactivated surfactant. Development of bacterial pneumonia is a well-recognized complication following aspiration of gastric contents. The investigators hypothesize that repeated aspirations would aggravate and accelerate an inflammatory response in the lung finally leading on to BPD. In addition oxygen mediated damage and mechanical ventilation potentiate lung injury due to aspiration. Logically, if GER and aspiration could be minimized, it could decrease the incidence and severity of BPD.

Certain positioning of the baby, small volume of feed increment, keeping a close watch on feed tolerance are practical ways of improving feeding tolerance and reducing GER. The intermittent bolus intra-gastric feeding method is commonly used to feed premature babies. Other alternatives are continuous intra-gastric (feed volume is slowly infused in the stomach over couple of hours through the nasogastric tube) and continuous transpyloric feeding (feeding tube passes beyond the stomach to the duodenum and feed volume is slowly infused over hours). Transpyloric continuous feeding as compared to intermittent gastric bolus feeding, has been found to significantly reduce ventilatory support requirements in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, possibly via its effect of minimising GER. In this study, none of the babies who received transpyloric feeding developed significant BPD and in addition babies with significant BPD improved after switching to transpyloric method. Transpyloric feeding tubes however are challenging to insert, and intestinal perforation is an uncommon but significant adverse effect. This feeding method is also not physiological as it bypasses the stomach. It remains to be seen if continuous gastric feeds, which is easily administered and safer, would yield some of the advantages of continuous transpyloric feeds over intermittent gastric feeding.

A Cochrane review in 2011 of continuous intra-gastric versus intermittent bolus intra-gastric feeding for premature infants found conflicting results, and was unable to make recommendations regarding the benefits and risks of these feeding methods. Clinical outcomes of interest from these trials were related to growth, feeding tolerance and gastrointestinal complications. The Cochrane review importantly found no significant difference in somatic growth and incidence of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) between either feeding methods. Another Cochrane review in 2014 did not identify any randomised trial that evaluated the effects of continuous versus intermittent bolus intragastric tube feeding on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in preterm and low birth weight infants and opined that well-designed and adequately powered trials are needed in this field. There were no studies comparing the effect of the above feeding methods on respiratory outcomes either.

Trial objectives

Aim: To compare the effect of intermittent bolus versus continuous intra-gastric feeding on the incidence and severity of BPD in very low birth weight infants (≤ 1250 grams).

Hypothesis: Continuous feeding (CF) minimises silent GER and micro-aspiration, thereby reducing the incidence and severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in high-risk infants when compared to intermittent bolus feeding (BF).

Statistical considerations

Sample size calculation: based on 2015 data from the Singapore National Very-Low-Birth-Weight (VLBW) Infant Network for infants ≤ 1250 grams, mortality rate was 12.9% and BPD rate (defined as any oxygen supplementation or any respiratory support at 36 weeks post-conceptional age) was 29.4%. Thus the composite primary outcome rate was 42.3%. For a primary outcome rate reduction from 45% to 22.5%, with a type 1 error rate of 5% and a power of 80%, a sample size of 68 infants in each arm is required, giving a total sample size of 136 infants.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Lung Disease of Prematurity Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomised-controlled trial with 2 parallel groups (1:1 ratio). Control group: intermittent bolus intra-gastric tube feeding (BF), Intervention group: continuous intra-gastric tube feeding (CF). Not blinded.

Stratified randomization along following birth weight groups:

1. \</=750 g
2. 751 - 1000 g
3. 1001 -1250 g Method of randomisation: Computer generated randomization codes stored in sealed opaque envelopes.

Intervention started by 72 hours of life (more than trophic feed volume achieved) and continued until an infant reaches a weight of 1.6 kg and is determined by the attending Neonatologist to be ready to commence oral feeding by breast or bottle, or when an infant attains a post-conceptional age of 36 weeks, whichever is earlier.

Continuous fed is delivered through a nasogastric tube by a syringe pump over 3hrs with 1 hour of break - 6 cycles a day. Feed volume, type of feed, feed increment regulated by the clinical team.

Intention to treat analysis.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

na. Open label

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Continuous feeding (CF)

Infants fed through a naso or orogastric tube in a continuous fashion using syringe pump. Each feed cycle is of 4 hours (3 hrs continuous feeding and 1 hour rest). 6 feed cycles in a day.

Feed volume increment per day is as per departmental protocol and same as comparator arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Method of feeding; continuous feeding OR bolus feeding

Intervention Type OTHER

CF: Infants fed through a naso or orogastric tube in a continuous fashion using syringe pump. Each feed cycle is of 4 hours (3 hrs continuous feeding and 1 hour rest). 6 feed cycles in a day.

BF: Infants fed through a naso or orogastric tube in a gravity dependent bolus feeding every 2-3 hours. Each feed would take approximately 10 minutes.

Bolus feeding (BF)

Infants fed through a naso or orogastric tube in a gravity dependent bolus feeding every 2-3 hours. Each feed would take approximately 10 minutes.

Feed volume increment per day is as per departmental protocol and same as experimental arm.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Method of feeding; continuous feeding OR bolus feeding

Intervention Type OTHER

CF: Infants fed through a naso or orogastric tube in a continuous fashion using syringe pump. Each feed cycle is of 4 hours (3 hrs continuous feeding and 1 hour rest). 6 feed cycles in a day.

BF: Infants fed through a naso or orogastric tube in a gravity dependent bolus feeding every 2-3 hours. Each feed would take approximately 10 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Method of feeding; continuous feeding OR bolus feeding

CF: Infants fed through a naso or orogastric tube in a continuous fashion using syringe pump. Each feed cycle is of 4 hours (3 hrs continuous feeding and 1 hour rest). 6 feed cycles in a day.

BF: Infants fed through a naso or orogastric tube in a gravity dependent bolus feeding every 2-3 hours. Each feed would take approximately 10 minutes.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Infants with a birth weight \<1250g and a gestational age of between 24+0 - 33+6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

1. Major congenital malformation
2. Chromosomal abnormality
3. 10-minute Apgar score of =3
4. Not expected to survive beyond 72 hours of age
5. Bilateral grade 4 intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH)
6. Did not consent / Consent not available
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

3 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National University Hospital, Singapore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Agnihotri Biswas, MRCPCH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Senior Consultant Neonatologist, NUH Singapore

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NICU, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status RECRUITING

NICU, National University Hospital

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Malaysia Singapore

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Agnihotri Biswas, MRCPCH

Role: CONTACT

+65 67725075

Jiun Lee, MRCPCH

Role: CONTACT

+65 67725076

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Fook-Choe Cheah, FRCPCH

Role: primary

+60 3 91456637

Agnihotri Biswas, MRCPCH

Role: primary

Jiun Lee, MRCPCH

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bancalari E, Claure N, Sosenko IR. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: changes in pathogenesis, epidemiology and definition. Semin Neonatol. 2003 Feb;8(1):63-71. doi: 10.1016/s1084-2756(02)00192-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12667831 (View on PubMed)

Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Walsh MC, Hale EC, Newman NS, Schibler K, Carlo WA, Kennedy KA, Poindexter BB, Finer NN, Ehrenkranz RA, Duara S, Sanchez PJ, O'Shea TM, Goldberg RN, Van Meurs KP, Faix RG, Phelps DL, Frantz ID 3rd, Watterberg KL, Saha S, Das A, Higgins RD; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):443-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2959. Epub 2010 Aug 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20732945 (View on PubMed)

Horbar JD, Carpenter JH, Badger GJ, Kenny MJ, Soll RF, Morrow KA, Buzas JS. Mortality and neonatal morbidity among infants 501 to 1500 grams from 2000 to 2009. Pediatrics. 2012 Jun;129(6):1019-26. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3028. Epub 2012 May 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22614775 (View on PubMed)

Ehrenkranz RA, Walsh MC, Vohr BR, Jobe AH, Wright LL, Fanaroff AA, Wrage LA, Poole K; National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Validation of the National Institutes of Health consensus definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1353-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0249.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16322158 (View on PubMed)

Jobe AH. The new bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011 Apr;23(2):167-72. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283423e6b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21169836 (View on PubMed)

Cristea AI, Carroll AE, Davis SD, Swigonski NL, Ackerman VL. Outcomes of children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia who were ventilator dependent at home. Pediatrics. 2013 Sep;132(3):e727-34. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2990. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23918888 (View on PubMed)

Walsh MC, Morris BH, Wrage LA, Vohr BR, Poole WK, Tyson JE, Wright LL, Ehrenkranz RA, Stoll BJ, Fanaroff AA; National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Extremely low birthweight neonates with protracted ventilation: mortality and 18-month neurodevelopmental outcomes. J Pediatr. 2005 Jun;146(6):798-804. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.047.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15973322 (View on PubMed)

Khemani E, McElhinney DB, Rhein L, Andrade O, Lacro RV, Thomas KC, Mullen MP. Pulmonary artery hypertension in formerly premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: clinical features and outcomes in the surfactant era. Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120(6):1260-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0971.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18055675 (View on PubMed)

Radford PJ, Stillwell PC, Blue B, Hertel G. Aspiration complicating bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Chest. 1995 Jan;107(1):185-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.1.185.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7813274 (View on PubMed)

Demirel G, Yilmaz Y, Uras N, Erdeve O, Ulu HO, Oguz SS, Dilmen U. Dramatical recovery of a mechanical ventilatory dependent extremely low birth weight premature infant after Nissen fundoplication. J Trop Pediatr. 2011 Dec;57(6):484-6. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmq125. Epub 2011 Jan 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21252395 (View on PubMed)

Gien J, Kinsella J, Thrasher J, Grenolds A, Abman SH, Baker CD. Retrospective Analysis of an Interdisciplinary Ventilator Care Program Intervention on Survival of Infants with Ventilator-Dependent Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. Am J Perinatol. 2017 Jan;34(2):155-163. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584897. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27355979 (View on PubMed)

Newell SJ, Booth IW, Morgan ME, Durbin GM, McNeish AS. Gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child. 1989 Jun;64(6):780-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.64.6.780.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2774613 (View on PubMed)

Ewer AK, Durbin GM, Morgan ME, Booth IW. Gastric emptying and gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996 Sep;75(2):F117-21. doi: 10.1136/fn.75.2.f117.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8949695 (View on PubMed)

Peter CS, Sprodowski N, Bohnhorst B, Silny J, Poets CF. Gastroesophageal reflux and apnea of prematurity: no temporal relationship. Pediatrics. 2002 Jan;109(1):8-11. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.1.8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11773535 (View on PubMed)

Lopez-Alonso M, Moya MJ, Cabo JA, Ribas J, del Carmen Macias M, Silny J, Sifrim D. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux. Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e299-308. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-3140. Epub 2006 Jul 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16831894 (View on PubMed)

Fuloria M, Hiatt D, Dillard RG, O'Shea TM. Gastroesophageal reflux in very low birth weight infants: association with chronic lung disease and outcomes through 1 year of age. J Perinatol. 2000 Jun;20(4):235-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200352.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10879336 (View on PubMed)

Jadcherla SR, Peng J, Chan CY, Moore R, Wei L, Fernandez S, DI Lorenzo C. Significance of gastroesophageal refluxate in relation to physical, chemical, and spatiotemporal characteristics in symptomatic intensive care unit neonates. Pediatr Res. 2011 Aug;70(2):192-8. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31821f704d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21730816 (View on PubMed)

Farhath S, He Z, Nakhla T, Saslow J, Soundar S, Camacho J, Stahl G, Shaffer S, Mehta DI, Aghai ZH. Pepsin, a marker of gastric contents, is increased in tracheal aspirates from preterm infants who develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics. 2008 Feb;121(2):e253-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0056.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18245400 (View on PubMed)

Knight PR, Davidson BA, Nader ND, Helinski JD, Marschke CJ, Russo TA, Hutson AD, Notter RH, Holm BA. Progressive, severe lung injury secondary to the interaction of insults in gastric aspiration. Exp Lung Res. 2004 Oct-Nov;30(7):535-57. doi: 10.1080/01902140490489162.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15371091 (View on PubMed)

Davidson BA, Knight PR, Wang Z, Chess PR, Holm BA, Russo TA, Hutson A, Notter RH. Surfactant alterations in acute inflammatory lung injury from aspiration of acid and gastric particulates. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005 Apr;288(4):L699-708. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00229.2004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15757954 (View on PubMed)

Nader-Djalal N, Knight PR, Davidson BA, Johnson K. Hyperoxia exacerbates microvascular lung injury following acid aspiration. Chest. 1997 Dec;112(6):1607-14. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.6.1607.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9404761 (View on PubMed)

Nader-Djalal N, Knight PR 3rd, Thusu K, Davidson BA, Holm BA, Johnson KJ, Dandona P. Reactive oxygen species contribute to oxygen-related lung injury after acid aspiration. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jul;87(1):127-33. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199807000-00028.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9661561 (View on PubMed)

Hermon MM, Wassermann E, Pfeiler C, Pollak A, Redl H, Strohmaier W. Early mechanical ventilation is deleterious after aspiration-induced lung injury in rabbits. Shock. 2005 Jan;23(1):59-64. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000143417.28273.6d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15614133 (View on PubMed)

Premji SS, Chessell L. Continuous nasogastric milk feeding versus intermittent bolus milk feeding for premature infants less than 1500 grams. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD001819. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001819.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22071802 (View on PubMed)

Richards R, Foster JP, Psaila K. Continuous versus bolus intragastric tube feeding for preterm and low birth weight infants with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 17;(7):CD009719. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009719.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25030383 (View on PubMed)

de Ville K, Knapp E, Al-Tawil Y, Berseth CL. Slow infusion feedings enhance duodenal motor responses and gastric emptying in preterm infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998 Jul;68(1):103-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/68.1.103.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9665103 (View on PubMed)

Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;163(7):1723-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2011060. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11401896 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018/00773

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.