"Cuffed Versus Uncuffed Tracheal Tubes in Small Children"

NCT ID: NCT00221377

Last Updated: 2012-05-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

4000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-04-30

Study Completion Date

2007-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized controlled multi-centre trial in children from birth up to \< 5 years of age aims to demonstrate equivalence as to the major outcome of post-extubation airway injury (stridor) comparing uncuffed tracheal tubes to current tracheal tubes with modern high volume - low pressure cuff combined with a cuff pressure release valve.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of cuffed tracheal tubes is a controversial topic in paediatric anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Cuffed tubes have traditionally been recommended for children older than 8 to 10 years. During the past decade, however, several authors have argued for the use of cuffed tracheal tubes in younger children and infants. A frequently cited argument against their use is the fear from post-extubation morbidity, allegedly caused by cuff induced tracheal and laryngeal airway injury. Using modern improved designed cuffed tracheal tubes, data from randomised prospective studies, performed in paediatric anaesthesia and intensive care units, suggest that using cuffed tracheal tubes do not carry an increased risk for airway morbidity as compared to uncuffed tracheal tubes in children below 8 years of age if correctly used. However, all these studies are based on single-centre experiences and/or included only a few neonates, infants and small children. Hence, there is equipoise as to the question, whether cuffed tubes are preferable over uncuffed standard tubes.

So, this randomized controlled multi-centre trial in children from birth up to \< 5 years of age aims to demonstrate equivalence as to the major outcome of post-extubation airway injury (stridor) comparing uncuffed tracheal tubes to current tracheal tubes with modern high volume - low pressure cuff combined with a cuff pressure release valve.

The primary hypothesis relates to the main outcome criteria of this study, which is post-extubation morbidity as measured by the presence or absence of stridor after tracheal extubation. The null-hypothesis Ho is defined as no difference in the incidence rates of post-extubation morbidity between cuffed and uncuffed groups. The null-hypothesis (Ho: u-Diff = 0) will be compared with the alternative hypothesis (H1: u-Diff \<\> 0). The study is designed to detect a clinically unacceptable deterioration of 1.5% above the baseline airway-injury rate of 2.5% when using uncuffed tubes with a power of 90% and a type I error probability of less than 5%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Need for Tracheal Tube Exchange Presence of Post-extubation Laryngeal Oedema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intubation using tracheal tubes with or without cuff

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children aged from birth (weighing \> 3 kg) to \<5 years
* Children requiring oro-tracheal or naso-tracheal intubation with a Magil shaped tracheal tube or preformed (RAE) tracheal tube as a part of their anaesthetic care and planed IPPV during the surgical / interventional / diagnostic procedure
* Tracheal intubation performed using direct laryngoscopy
* Extubation after the procedure in the OR theatre
* Procedure performed in supine position
* Patients for elective and emergency surgery and/or interventions if there is no risk for regurgitation or pulmonary aspiration
* ASA I and II patients
* Written parental consent

Exclusion Criteria

* No parental written consent obtained
* Known airway anomalies (airway stenosis, including Down's Syndrome)
* Known or suspected difficult intubation
* Known need for abnormal tube size
* Full stomach and/or at risk for regurgitation
* Surgery of the larynx and/or of the trachea and/or neck and/or upper oesophagus
* Pulmonary diseases (concurrent pneumonia or bronchial infection, asthma requiring inhalation medication, pulmonary malformations)
* ASA class III and higher
* Fiberoptic intubation or alternative intubation technique
* Patients planned for postoperative ventilation in the ICU
* Weight and/or height percentiles \< 3% / \> 97%
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

5 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Children's Hospital, Zurich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Markus Weiss, Prof MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Children's Hospital, Anesthesiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anesthesia And Critical Care Medicine - Medical University

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Departement of Anaesthesia - Cliniques Universitaire St. Luc

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Dept. of Anaesthesia and Reanimation - University Hospital Motol

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Klinik für Anasthesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin - Klinikum Augsburg

Augsburg, , Germany

Site Status

Clinic of Anesthesiology - Charite-Universitätsmedizin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Dep. Anesthesiology and Intensive Care - Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Dept. of Anaesthesia - Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Dept. of Anaesthesia Kliniken Loerrach

Loerrach, , Germany

Site Status

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care - University Hospital Mannheim

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Klinik für Anaesthesie, LMU München - Dr. U. Haunersches Kinderspital

München, , Germany

Site Status

Anaesthesia - Klinik St. Hedwig

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Children's University Hospital - Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care - Faculty Hospital of Luis Pasteur

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care - Astrid Lindgrens Children's Hospital

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

University Children's Hospital

Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland

Site Status

Klinik für Anästhesie und Op. Intensivmedizin

Aarau, , Switzerland

Site Status

Klinik für Anästhesiologie - Inselspital

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Dept. of Anaesthesia, Geneva Children's Hospital

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Service d'Anesthesiologie - CHUV

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Anästhesie - Ostschweizer Kinderspital

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Anaesthetics - Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Anaesthetic Department - Royal Hospital for Sick Children

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Anaesthetic Department - Ledds General Infirmary

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Anaesthesia - Chelsa and Westminster NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Belgium Czechia Germany Slovakia Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STV1/05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

no grants

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Paediatric Microcuff Pressure Study
NCT03240354 COMPLETED NA