Comparison of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons Against Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Elective PCI Using OCT

NCT ID: NCT02607241

Last Updated: 2018-10-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

59 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Study Completion Date

2018-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective randomized clinical trial aims to compare two different "metal-free" strategies for elective percutaneous coronary revascularization: the FFR-guided DCB-only PCI (drug-coated balloon: SeQuent Please™, B Braun Melsungen GmBH) vs. OCT-guided BRS implantation (bioresorbable scaffold: Absorb™, Abbott Vascular).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

Coronary artery disease (CAD) accounts for most deaths in the industrialized countries due to its high prevalence of 6-8%. CAD is mainly treated by percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), which currently involve in over 90% of cases the implantation of metallic stents, mostly as drug-eluting devices(DES). Despite continuous technological advancement over the last decade, DES are still limited at long-term follow-up by restenosis and also by the risk of thrombosis, occurring in 5-20% and respectively 0.5-1.7% of cases. Therefore, two metal-free strategies are evaluated in order to overcome these intrinsic limitations of DES:

1. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) proved comparable safety and efficacy at 1 year compared to best-in-class DES comparators and also showed in small substudies very promising 5-year results with restoration of vasomotricity and positive vessel remodeling. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the new gold standard for endovascular imaging of stents, atherosclerosis progression, vulnerable plaque and neointimal proliferation. OCT is currently recommended for both guidance of implantation and for assessment of long-term results of BRS.
2. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) were mainly employed to treat restenosis in metallic stents, but newer reports advocate their potential to be used as stand-alone treatment of de-novo stenoses without stenting, especially when fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements are additionally used to assess PCI results.

This clinical trial evaluates the FFR-guided DCB-only (experimental arm: SeQuent Please™, B Braun Melsungen GmBH) PCI against the OCT-guided BRS implantation (comparator arm: Absorb™, Abbott Vascular) for treatment of stable CAD. The trial is designed as a non-inferiority, nationally conducted, multicenter, open-labeled, controlled study using a 1:1 block randomization and am invasive 6-9 month follow-up (f/u) by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT.

Beyond the pre-specified endpoints the study mainly looking at suppression of neointimal proliferation, we will also investigate the patterns of healing and neointimal proliferation, the plaque morphology and neoatherosclerosis f/u using OCT at 6-9 months. Clinically, we attempt to record the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: acute myocardial infarction, cardiac death, TLR) up to 5 years after the index procedure.

A number of 196 patients scheduled for PCI with a native coronary stenosis suitable for BRS implantation and OCT imaging will be openly 1:1 randomized. This number of patients is considered to be sufficient to prove non-inferiority of DCB-only vs. BRS, using a margin of 0.2 mm with a confidence interval of 0.5 mm for the primary endpoint (diameter NLG).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BRS

OCT-guided BRS implantation: implantation of a bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) under OCT guidance.

Note: Absorb™ from Abbott Vascular has been used as BRS until this product became unavailable in April 2017. Currently the recruitment is stopped due to this issue, until the use of another BRS gets final approval.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

OCT-guided BRS implantation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantation of a BRS using OCT to measure vessel size, choose BRS size and length and assess implantation results and the need of further postdilations

DCB-only

FFR-guided DCB-only PCI: PCI using DCB (SeQuent Please™, B Braun Melsungen GmBH) without stent implantation und FFR guidance

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FFR-guided DCB-only PCI

Intervention Type DEVICE

PCI performed under FFR guidance using following algorithm: (1) predilation followed by angiographic assessment of residual stenosis and dissections; (2) evaluate suitability for DCB-only, which is deemed feasible if the FFR \> 0.8, residual diameter stenosis \< 40% and no flow-limiting dissections are observed; (3) DCB dilation and (4) assessment of final results using FFR and QCA measurements. Provisional stenting is allowed only if the final PCI results are not acceptable (flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis \> 40% or FFR \< 0.8).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

OCT-guided BRS implantation

Implantation of a BRS using OCT to measure vessel size, choose BRS size and length and assess implantation results and the need of further postdilations

Intervention Type DEVICE

FFR-guided DCB-only PCI

PCI performed under FFR guidance using following algorithm: (1) predilation followed by angiographic assessment of residual stenosis and dissections; (2) evaluate suitability for DCB-only, which is deemed feasible if the FFR \> 0.8, residual diameter stenosis \< 40% and no flow-limiting dissections are observed; (3) DCB dilation and (4) assessment of final results using FFR and QCA measurements. Provisional stenting is allowed only if the final PCI results are not acceptable (flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis \> 40% or FFR \< 0.8).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* written consent
* indication for elective PCI of a de novo coronary stenosis in a native vessel
* coronary multivessel disease with clinically proven indication for repeating coronary angiography at 6-9 months (staged PCI strategy)

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnancy, lactation, women of childbearing age w/o reliable contraception
* life expectance \< 50 % at 1 year
* major surgery planned within 6 months
* participation in other clinical trials or impossibility to give written consent
* acute coronary syndrome or cardiogenic shock within the last 4 weeks
* stent thrombosis, defined as "probable" or "definite" by ARC
* contraindication against dual antiplatelet therapy
* allergy against mTOR-inhibitors or taxol derivates
* target lesion situated in the left main coronary artery, in a bypass graft or a grafted vessel
* reference luminal diameter of the target lesion \> 3.75 mm or \< 2.0 mm
* lesion length \> 30 mm, bifurcation lesion requiring intervention on a major side branch
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

KKS Netzwerk

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Jena

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tudor C. Poerner, MD

PD Dr. med. Tudor C. Poerner

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tudor C Poerner, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jena University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital of Jena, Heart Center, Division of Cardiology

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UKJ-TCP-3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.