Comparison of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons Against Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Elective PCI Using OCT
NCT ID: NCT02607241
Last Updated: 2018-10-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
59 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-11-30
2018-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Paclitaxel Releasing Balloon in Patients Presenting With In-Stent Restenosis
NCT00961181
Optical Coherence Tomography to Evaluate Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloons and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents
NCT01056744
Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold vs. Drug Coated Balloon for Treatment Of In-Stent-Restenosis
NCT03529006
DEB Versus 2nd Generation DES in Patients With In-Scaffold Restenosis of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold
NCT03074305
Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon After Bare Metal Stent Implantation vs. Drug-Eluting Stent in St Elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT03610347
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) accounts for most deaths in the industrialized countries due to its high prevalence of 6-8%. CAD is mainly treated by percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), which currently involve in over 90% of cases the implantation of metallic stents, mostly as drug-eluting devices(DES). Despite continuous technological advancement over the last decade, DES are still limited at long-term follow-up by restenosis and also by the risk of thrombosis, occurring in 5-20% and respectively 0.5-1.7% of cases. Therefore, two metal-free strategies are evaluated in order to overcome these intrinsic limitations of DES:
1. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) proved comparable safety and efficacy at 1 year compared to best-in-class DES comparators and also showed in small substudies very promising 5-year results with restoration of vasomotricity and positive vessel remodeling. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the new gold standard for endovascular imaging of stents, atherosclerosis progression, vulnerable plaque and neointimal proliferation. OCT is currently recommended for both guidance of implantation and for assessment of long-term results of BRS.
2. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) were mainly employed to treat restenosis in metallic stents, but newer reports advocate their potential to be used as stand-alone treatment of de-novo stenoses without stenting, especially when fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements are additionally used to assess PCI results.
This clinical trial evaluates the FFR-guided DCB-only (experimental arm: SeQuent Please™, B Braun Melsungen GmBH) PCI against the OCT-guided BRS implantation (comparator arm: Absorb™, Abbott Vascular) for treatment of stable CAD. The trial is designed as a non-inferiority, nationally conducted, multicenter, open-labeled, controlled study using a 1:1 block randomization and am invasive 6-9 month follow-up (f/u) by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT.
Beyond the pre-specified endpoints the study mainly looking at suppression of neointimal proliferation, we will also investigate the patterns of healing and neointimal proliferation, the plaque morphology and neoatherosclerosis f/u using OCT at 6-9 months. Clinically, we attempt to record the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: acute myocardial infarction, cardiac death, TLR) up to 5 years after the index procedure.
A number of 196 patients scheduled for PCI with a native coronary stenosis suitable for BRS implantation and OCT imaging will be openly 1:1 randomized. This number of patients is considered to be sufficient to prove non-inferiority of DCB-only vs. BRS, using a margin of 0.2 mm with a confidence interval of 0.5 mm for the primary endpoint (diameter NLG).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
BRS
OCT-guided BRS implantation: implantation of a bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) under OCT guidance.
Note: Absorb™ from Abbott Vascular has been used as BRS until this product became unavailable in April 2017. Currently the recruitment is stopped due to this issue, until the use of another BRS gets final approval.
OCT-guided BRS implantation
Implantation of a BRS using OCT to measure vessel size, choose BRS size and length and assess implantation results and the need of further postdilations
DCB-only
FFR-guided DCB-only PCI: PCI using DCB (SeQuent Please™, B Braun Melsungen GmBH) without stent implantation und FFR guidance
FFR-guided DCB-only PCI
PCI performed under FFR guidance using following algorithm: (1) predilation followed by angiographic assessment of residual stenosis and dissections; (2) evaluate suitability for DCB-only, which is deemed feasible if the FFR \> 0.8, residual diameter stenosis \< 40% and no flow-limiting dissections are observed; (3) DCB dilation and (4) assessment of final results using FFR and QCA measurements. Provisional stenting is allowed only if the final PCI results are not acceptable (flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis \> 40% or FFR \< 0.8).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
OCT-guided BRS implantation
Implantation of a BRS using OCT to measure vessel size, choose BRS size and length and assess implantation results and the need of further postdilations
FFR-guided DCB-only PCI
PCI performed under FFR guidance using following algorithm: (1) predilation followed by angiographic assessment of residual stenosis and dissections; (2) evaluate suitability for DCB-only, which is deemed feasible if the FFR \> 0.8, residual diameter stenosis \< 40% and no flow-limiting dissections are observed; (3) DCB dilation and (4) assessment of final results using FFR and QCA measurements. Provisional stenting is allowed only if the final PCI results are not acceptable (flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis \> 40% or FFR \< 0.8).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* indication for elective PCI of a de novo coronary stenosis in a native vessel
* coronary multivessel disease with clinically proven indication for repeating coronary angiography at 6-9 months (staged PCI strategy)
Exclusion Criteria
* life expectance \< 50 % at 1 year
* major surgery planned within 6 months
* participation in other clinical trials or impossibility to give written consent
* acute coronary syndrome or cardiogenic shock within the last 4 weeks
* stent thrombosis, defined as "probable" or "definite" by ARC
* contraindication against dual antiplatelet therapy
* allergy against mTOR-inhibitors or taxol derivates
* target lesion situated in the left main coronary artery, in a bypass graft or a grafted vessel
* reference luminal diameter of the target lesion \> 3.75 mm or \< 2.0 mm
* lesion length \> 30 mm, bifurcation lesion requiring intervention on a major side branch
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
KKS Netzwerk
NETWORK
University of Jena
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tudor C. Poerner, MD
PD Dr. med. Tudor C. Poerner
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tudor C Poerner, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Jena University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital of Jena, Heart Center, Division of Cardiology
Jena, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UKJ-TCP-3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.