Wall Shear Stress and Neointimal Healing Following PCI in Angulated Coronary Vessels
NCT ID: NCT02098876
Last Updated: 2022-09-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
86 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-05-31
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Evaluation of the Commercially Available Medtronic Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System
NCT01638507
Non-acute Coronary occlusIon Treated By Everolimus ELuting Stent
NCT00793221
Randomized "All-comer" Evaluation of a Permanent Polymer Resolute Integrity Stent Versus a Polymer Free Cre8 Stent
NCT02328898
STENTYS Self-expanding Versus Balloon-expandable Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
NCT01008085
A Randomized Comparison of Long-Term Healing Between Biodegradable- Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus Eluting Stents in STEMI
NCT03440801
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators study will evaluate two FDA-approved DES, currently in use, with respect to coronary vessel healing and long term patency. These include the XIENCE Xpedition Everolimus drug-eluting stent (X-EES) from Abbott Vascular and Resolute Integrity® Zotarolimus drug-eluting stent (R-ZES) from Medtronic, Inc, both of which have been shown in large clinical trials to be safe and effective. This study will evaluate the effects of apparently subtle differences in stent design between these two platforms that may have important effects on regional plaque response and blood flow dynamics immediately after stent deployment and stent healing and scar formation at 12 months follow up.
Several aspect of the R-ZES compared to the X-EES design may result in more favorable regional plaque response and blood flow dynamics immediately after stent deployment. These include a more compliant stent design made of a single sinusoidal wire with no connector between struts that is likely to be more comformable to a curved or angulated coronary vessels. In heart vessels which are not angulated, these features may not make a major difference in outcomes as studies already suggest. Whereas, in narrowed arteries which are curved or angulated, the use of X-EES could result in more straightening of the vessel's natural curvature and more disturbance in flow patterns. In contrast, the use of R-ZES in angulated arteries could cause less hemodynamic disturbances. There is a great deal of data suggesting that disturbances in local blood flow patterns and creation of eddy currents ('turbulent' blood flow) could adversely affect stent healing and exacerbate neointimal tissue growth.
Using two intravascular imaging technologies, the optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), this study aims to investigate differences in scar tissue coverage within the stented region and the degree of narrowing at the edges of the stent in patients undergoing clinically-indicated PCI (with R-ZES and X-EES) at 12-month follow-up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Resolute Integrity DES
Resolute Integrity zotarolimus eluting stent
Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus eluting stent
PCI with Resolute stent
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be performed at baseline to assess plaque burden prior to and after stent deployment as well as to evaluate stent expansion and stent apposition. OCT will be repeated at one year follow-up to evaluate neo-intimal tissue coverage within the stent and change in plaque area at the stent edges. Offline, manual detection of lumen area and stent area will be performed for each OCT cross-section from baseline and follow up examinations.
Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) will be performed at baseline to assess plaque burden prior to and after stent deployment as well as to evaluate stent expansion and stent apposition. IVUS will be repeated at one year follow-up to evaluate neo-intimal tissue coverage within the stent and change in plaque area at the stent edges. Offline, manual detection of lumen area, stent area, vessel area (external elastic membrane) and the media-adventitia interface will be performed for each IVUS cross-section from baseline and follow up examinations.
Xience Xpedition DES
Xience Xpedition everolimus eluting stent
Xience Xpedition everolimus eluting stent
PCI with Xience stent
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be performed at baseline to assess plaque burden prior to and after stent deployment as well as to evaluate stent expansion and stent apposition. OCT will be repeated at one year follow-up to evaluate neo-intimal tissue coverage within the stent and change in plaque area at the stent edges. Offline, manual detection of lumen area and stent area will be performed for each OCT cross-section from baseline and follow up examinations.
Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) will be performed at baseline to assess plaque burden prior to and after stent deployment as well as to evaluate stent expansion and stent apposition. IVUS will be repeated at one year follow-up to evaluate neo-intimal tissue coverage within the stent and change in plaque area at the stent edges. Offline, manual detection of lumen area, stent area, vessel area (external elastic membrane) and the media-adventitia interface will be performed for each IVUS cross-section from baseline and follow up examinations.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus eluting stent
PCI with Resolute stent
Xience Xpedition everolimus eluting stent
PCI with Xience stent
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be performed at baseline to assess plaque burden prior to and after stent deployment as well as to evaluate stent expansion and stent apposition. OCT will be repeated at one year follow-up to evaluate neo-intimal tissue coverage within the stent and change in plaque area at the stent edges. Offline, manual detection of lumen area and stent area will be performed for each OCT cross-section from baseline and follow up examinations.
Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) will be performed at baseline to assess plaque burden prior to and after stent deployment as well as to evaluate stent expansion and stent apposition. IVUS will be repeated at one year follow-up to evaluate neo-intimal tissue coverage within the stent and change in plaque area at the stent edges. Offline, manual detection of lumen area, stent area, vessel area (external elastic membrane) and the media-adventitia interface will be performed for each IVUS cross-section from baseline and follow up examinations.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Severe coronary lesion in a vessel with ≥ 30-degree angulation requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
3. Lesion treatable by a single Resolute Integrity or Onyx Abbott Xience Xpedition or Sierra coronary drug-eluting stent.
4. Patients with stable ischemic heart disease or acute coronary syndrome undergoing clinically PCI.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Anatomy requiring coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)
3. History of prior CABG in the territory of the vessel being considered for PCI
4. Heavily calcified lesion requiring rotablation or other debulking or scoring device for successful stent deployment
5. Large thrombus burden on recent angiography
6. Previously stented vessels
7. Ostial lesions: lesion located within 5mm of the origin of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCx), or Right coronary artery (RCA)
8. Lesions at bifurcations and those that occlude side branches \>2.5mm
9. Recent (\<72 hours) ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
10. Planned surgical procedures in the subsequent 12 months
11. History of hypersensitivity or contraindication to device materials and their degradants, everolimus, zotarolimus, cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic, and fluoropolymers
12. History of any solid organ transplantation or subject is on a waiting list for any solid organ transplant
13. Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30%
14. Known allergies to clinically utilized anti-thrombotic or anti-platelet agents
15. Unable to tolerate long term dual antiplatelet therapy
16. Pregnancy or lactation
30 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic
INDUSTRY
Emory University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Habib Samady
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Habib Samady, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Georgia Heart Institute, Northeast Georgia Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Heart Center
Nanjing, , China
Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
Hyōgo, , Japan
Wakayama Medical University Department of Cardiovascular Medicine
Wakayama, , Japan
Latvian Society of Cardiology Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
Riga, , Latvia
University Clinical Center of Serbia
Belgrade, , Serbia
Seoul National University College of Medicine
Seoul, , South Korea
Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Division of Cardiology
Seoul, , South Korea
Ulsan University Hospital University of Ulsan College of Medicine
Ulsan, , South Korea
Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Madrid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00066353
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.