Zotarolimus and Everolimus-Eluting Stents ProsPectively Compared in Real World

NCT ID: NCT00768846

Last Updated: 2008-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

2600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-09-30

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Resolute stent is not inferior to the everolimus- eluting Xience V stent platform regarding a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation in a real-world population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of stents has become common practice in the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease. Restenosis affected 20-40% of de novo coronary lesions treated with bare metal stents. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have emerged as the most effective strategy for the prevention of restenosis. The first available DES were the Sirolimus-eluting Cypher and the Paclitaxel-eluting Taxus stent. Although their mid-term efficacy has been well-established, there is an ongoing debate on the potential of an increased incidence of late stent thrombosis, as well as of delayed onset of restenosis or catch-up phenomenon with DES. Recent evidence demonstrates that there might be differences between various DES in terms of safety and efficacy. The differences might be related to the drug, polymer or stent design. Everolimus (SDZ-RAD) and zotarolimus (ABT-578) are new antiproliferative agents that share some common structural and biological properties with sirolimus ("limus-group"). Both drugs bind to the intracellular sirolimus receptor, FK 506-binding protein 12 (FKBP 12). The drug-FKBP12 complex inhibits cell cycle progression via inactivation of the mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) thereby regulating vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation. Preclinical studies showed improved endothelialization and limited chronic inflammation of the everolimus-eluting stent compared with previous drug-eluting stents. Moreover, first randomized clinical trials of everolimus-eluting stents have shown promising results regarding safety, feasibility and efficacy in the suppression of neointimal proliferation. Safety and efficacy of the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor stent have been investigated in the Endeavor clinical program. In the Endeavor III and IV trials, the Endeavour stent proved inferior to the Cypher and Taxus stents regarding angiographic endpoints. However, rates of target vessel failure were similar in both groups. The Endeavor RESOLUTE stent platform uses a new polymer with potential improvements of drug release compared to the Endeavor stent. The RESOLUTE clinical trial is the first-in man, observational, uncontrolled, non-randomized study evaluating the Endeavor Resolute drug-eluting stent with the new polymer. The trial enrolled a total of 130 patients with native coronary artery lesions. There are no data available comparing the zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Resolute stent with the everolimus-eluting Xience V stent. Thus the aim of this prospective, randomized study is to compare the efficacy and safety of these two "new generation" drug-eluting stent platforms in a real world population.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

PCI Stent DES CAD

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Endeavor Resolute Stent

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endeavor Resolute Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Resolute Stent

2

Xience V Stent

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Xience V Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Everolimus-eluting Xience V Stent

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endeavor Resolute Stent

Zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Resolute Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Xience V Stent

Everolimus-eluting Xience V Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients older than 18 years with symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing PCI with stent implantation.
* Written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Cardiogenic shock.
* Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than 12 months or that may result in protocol non-compliance.
* Known allergy to the study medications: everolimus, zotarolimus, cobalt chrome.
* Inability to take clopidogrel for at least 6 months.
* Pregnancy (present, suspected or planned) or positive pregnancy test. (In women with childbearing potential a pregnancy test is mandatory.)
* Previous enrollment in this trial.
* Patient's inability to fully cooperate with the study protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Klinik fuer Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adnan Kastrati, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich

Julinda Mehilli, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

1st Medizinische Klinik Klinikum rechts der Isar

Munich, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich

Munich, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Julinda Mehilli, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +49-1218

Email: [email protected]

Stefanie Schulz, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +49-1218

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Josef Dirschinger, MD

Role: primary

Julinda Mehilli, MD

Role: primary

Stefanie Schulz, MD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GE IDE No. S03008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id