Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis

NCT ID: NCT01735825

Last Updated: 2022-12-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

199 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2018-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy of coronary in-stent restenosis therapy using drug eluting paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters with the latest generation of drug eluting stents releasing everolimus.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In-stent restenosis after coronary angioplasty is currently one of the main limitations of this method, leading to a recurrence of exertional angina pectoris or manifesting as acute coronary syndrome. Histopathologic substrate of in-stent restenosis is neointimal hyperplasia.

Repeated plain balloon angioplasty or using cutting balloon catheters in the treatment of in-stent restenosis does not achieve satisfactory results. Brachytherapy, used in the past, it has also abandoned. The current treatment of in-stent restenosis is the use of drug eluting stents. Local drug released from these stents prevents new neointimal hyperplasia.This treatment carries the risk of late thrombosis (due to delayed neoendotelization) the stent struts and requires rigorous long-term dual antiplatelet therapy with the risk of bleeding complications. The drug-coated balloon catheters provide short-term penetration of the active substance into the vascular wall, leading to the inhibition of hyperproliferation vascular smooth muscle cells, but due to short-term effect they do not affect negatively stent struts neoendotelization. Comparable effects of in-stent restenosis therapy using paclitaxel releasing balloons was demonstrated in comparison with paclitaxel releasing stents, however, the development of drug eluting stents meanwhile progressed. The aim of our study is to compare efficacy of coronary in-stent restenosis therapy using drug eluting paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters with the latest generation of drug eluting stents releasing everolimus. Primary endpoint of our study is late lumen loss, because it represents accurate angiographic parameter predicting the need for repeat revascularisation and thus the clinical benefit for the patient.

The 3rd observational, non-randomised arm compares the treatment with seal-wing paclitaxel-eluting balloon with two randomised arms (PEB vs. EES).

3-year long term clinical follow-up of iopromide-coated PEB and EES arms was performed. All clinical MACE (CV death, AMI and TVR) were recorded.

Subanalysis of seal-wing PEB arm comparrng the treatment of BMS and DES-ISR was added.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Restenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

iopromide coated paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
double blind

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

iopromide paclitaxel-eluting balloon

Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis treated by drug eluting paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter (iopomide coating)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter with Iopromide coating

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis treated by drug eluting paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter

drug eluting stent

Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis treated by drug eluting stent with everolimus

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

drug eluting stent with everolimus

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis treated by drug eluting stent with everolimus

seal-wing PEB

Observational, non-randomised arm:

Pts with ISR treated by seal-wing paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter

Group Type OTHER

seal-wing paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis treated by seal-wing paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter with Iopromide coating

Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis treated by drug eluting paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter

Intervention Type DEVICE

drug eluting stent with everolimus

Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis treated by drug eluting stent with everolimus

Intervention Type DEVICE

seal-wing paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter

Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis treated by seal-wing paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sequent Please Promus Protege

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* history of percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement
* verified coronary in-stent restenosis suitable for percutaneous re-intervention
* signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* contraindication to long term dual antiplatelet therapy
* increased risk of bleeding
* known generalized malignancy
* pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Ostrava

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Leos Pleva, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Czechia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

1.TAXUS III Trial: In-Stent Restenosis Treated With Stent-Based Delivery of Paclitaxel Incorporated in a Slow-Release Polymer Formulation J. van der Giessen, Circulation 2003,107:559-564: 2.Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial. Kastrati A,JAMA 2005;293:165-71 3.Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated ballon catheter, B.Scheller, NEJM,355;20,Nov 16,2006 4.Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel- Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Coronary Restenosis in Sirolimus-Eluting Stents The ISAR-DESIRE 2 Study. Mehilli J, J Am Coll Cardiol 2010 Mar 5 5.Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. Stone GW,. N Engl J Med 2010 May 6;362:1663-74 6.Angiogaphic surrogate end points in drug-eluting stent trials, S.J.Pocock, JACC, Vol 51,No 1,2008

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Pleva L, Kukla P, Zapletalova J, Hlinomaz O. Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 15;92(6):E416-E424. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27688. Epub 2018 Jul 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30019843 (View on PubMed)

Pleva L, Kukla P, Zapletalova J, Hlinomaz O. Efficacy of a seal-wing paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters in the treatment of bare metal stent restenosis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jun 26;17(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0602-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28651572 (View on PubMed)

Pleva L, Kukla P, Kusnierova P, Zapletalova J, Hlinomaz O. Comparison of the Efficacy of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Catheters and Everolimus-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: The Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;9(4):e003316. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003316.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27069104 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FNO-KVO 631/2011 Pleva

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.