Clinical Performance of the Pantera Lux Balloon Versus the Orsiro Stent in Patients With In-stent Restenosis.
NCT ID: NCT01651390
Last Updated: 2016-09-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
231 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-06-30
2016-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hybrid Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Combining a Bioresorbable Scaffold With Drug-coated Balloons Versus a Conventional Drug-eluting Stent-based Strategy in Patients With Long and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease
NCT06710210
Drug Eluting Pantera Lux Catheter Registry
NCT01081366
Study of the Orsiro Drug Eluting Stent System
NCT01356888
Comparison of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons Against Drug-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Elective PCI Using OCT
NCT02607241
Bioresorbable Polymer ORSIRO Versus Durable Polymer RESOLUTE ONYX Stents
NCT02508714
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Up to 210 subjects will be block randomized 2:1 to receive the Pantera Lux balloon or the Orsiro stent and will be stratified according to diabetic status at screening.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Drug coated balloon
Percutaneous coronary intervention with the Pantera Lux drug coated balloon.
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Up to 140 patients meeting the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are randomly selected and stratified according to diabetic status at screening are treated with the Pantera Lux drug coated balloon.
Drug eluting stent
Percutaneous coronary intervention with the Orsiro drug eluting stent.
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Up to 70 patients meeting the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are randomly selected and stratified according to diabetic status at screening are treated with the Orsiro drug eluting stent.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Up to 140 patients meeting the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are randomly selected and stratified according to diabetic status at screening are treated with the Pantera Lux drug coated balloon.
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Up to 70 patients meeting the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are randomly selected and stratified according to diabetic status at screening are treated with the Orsiro drug eluting stent.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject ≥ 18 years
3. Clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease and/or a positive functional study, stable or unstable angina pectoris or documented silent ischemia
4. Subject eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention
5. Subject acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass surgery
6. Subject with an in-stent restenotic lesion\* in either a bare metal stent or drug eluting stents (Mehran class I, II, III, IV - Mehran et al. Circulation 199; 100: 1872-1878). \*Target lesion
7. Subjects with a maximum of 2 target lesions. In case of 2 target lesions, both lesions must be either in bare metal stents or drug eluting stents, and must treated during the same session with the same type of device as per randomization outcome, e.g. drug eluting stent.
8. Target reference vessel diameter (visual estimation): ≥ 2.0 and ≤ 4.0 mm
9. Target lesion length (visual estimation): ≥ 6.0 and ≤ 28.0 mm
10. Target lesion stenosis (visual estimation): \> 50 % and ≤ 100 %
11. Target lesion in a native coronary artery
Exclusion Criteria
2. Evidence of acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction within 48 hours prior to index procedure according to the universal definition of myocardial infarction
3. Subjects with acute cardiac decompensation or acute cardiogenic shock
4. Subject with a life expectancy of less than 18 month
5. In the investigators opinion subject who will not be able to comply with the follow up requirements
6. Impaired renal function (excluded are subjects in need of dialysis or subjects with a creatinine level ≥ 221 µmol per liter (2.5 mg per deciliter) within 72 hours of the intended treatment)
7. Thrombus in the target vessel
8. Target lesion located in left main coronary artery
9. Documented left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 30%
10. Known allergies to: acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, heparin, contrast medium, sirolimus or similar drugs (i.e., ABT 578, biolimus, tacrolimus); CoCr, PLLA, silicon carbide
11. Subject is receiving oral or intravenous immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., inhaled steroids are not excluded) or has known life-limiting immunosuppressive or autoimmune disease (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus, but not including diabetes mellitus)
12. Subject currently enrolled in other investigational device or drug trial in which primary endpoint has not been reached
13. Pregnant and/or breast-feeding females or females who intend to become pregnant during the time of the study
14. Previously enrolled in this trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Biotronik AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christoph K Naber, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Contilia Heart- and Vascular Center, Elisabeth Krankenhaus, Klara-Kopp-Weg 1, 45138 Essen, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, , Germany
Heart Center Segeberger Kliniken
Bad Segeberg, , Germany
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Centrum 11 für Herz-, Kreislauf- und Gefäßmedizin
Berlin, , Germany
Innere Medizin Kardiologie - Charité Centrum 11, Campus Benjamin Franklin
Berlin, , Germany
Kardiologie - Angiologie - Pneumologie, Klinikum Coburg
Coburg, , Germany
Contilia Heart- and Vascular Center, Elisabeth Krankenhaus
Essen, , Germany
Medical Care Center Prof. Mathey, Prof. Schofer
Hamburg, , Germany
Kardiologie /Intern. Intensivmedizin, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden
Minden, , Germany
Klinikum Schwabing
Munich, , Germany
LMU - Klinikum der Universität München
Munich, , Germany
Klinikum Bogenhausen
Munich, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für Kardiologie
Münster, , Germany
Innere Medizin III Kardiologie, Kliniken Villingen
Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany
Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
Riga, , Latvia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2344-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313.
Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Stone GW, Leon MB. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation. 1999 Nov 2;100(18):1872-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.18.1872.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
C1105
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.