Optical Coherence Tomography to Evaluate Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloons and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents
NCT ID: NCT01056744
Last Updated: 2013-02-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-06-30
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Safety concerns regarding use of drug eluting stent systems (DES) are related mostly to late stent thrombosis, which is facilitated by incomplete stent endothelial coverage. Specific information about time course and amount of endothelial strut coverage of different DES is required, in order to further refine the concept of antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is emerging as a new gold standard for endovascular imaging of stents, atherosclerosis progression, vulnerable plaque and neointimal proliferation. Very limited OCT data about endothelial coverage of DES are currently available. Aim of this study is a comparative evaluation of XIENCE V® everolimus eluting stent (Abbot Vascular) and of the bare metal stent (BMS) Coroflex® Blue postdilated with the drug-eluting balloon (DEB) SeQuent® Please (paclitaxel-eluting balloon, B. Braun Melsungen AG) in terms of endothelial coverage and neointimal proliferation using OCT.
Study Design:
A number of 80 patients scheduled for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a native coronary stenosis suitable for DES implantation and OCT imaging are openly randomized 1:1 to either XIENCE V® or Coroflex® Blue/Sequent® Please. The study is prospectively conducted at a university high-volume PCI center with OCT expertise (Jena, Germany). Angiographic follow-up and OCT imaging with motorized pull-back at 1 mm/s are planned in all patients 6 months after implantation of the study stents. OCT endpoints are: (1) endothelial coverage, expressed as % of struts without coverage and % of stent length containing non-covered struts, and respectively (2) neointimal proliferation, given as % neointimal volumetric proliferation within the whole stent and also as focal peak % neointimal area proliferation. The study is not powered for clinical endpoints, which are: subacute or late stent thrombosis and need for revascularization of the stent segment. Given the high number of measurements (15 cross-section images / 1 mm stent length), OCT endpoints are likely to reach significance at the level P \< 0.05 even at a follow-up drop-out rate up to 20%.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optical Coherence Tomography Following Paclitaxel Eluting Stent Implantation in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
NCT00704145
Optical Coherence Tomography for Drug Eluting Stent Safety
NCT00693030
Intracoronary Stenting and Restenosis - Randomized Trial of Drug-eluting Stent Implantation or Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty According to Neointima Morphology in Drug-eluting Stent Restenosis 5
NCT05544864
Intimal Hyperplasia Evaluated by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in de Novo Coronary Lesions Treated by Drug-eluting Balloon and Bare-metal Stent
NCT01057563
Comparison of the 3-month Strut Coverage After Coronary Stenting by Optical Coherence Tomography; Cilotax and DESyne
NCT02060175
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DES
Implantation of a XIENCE® V everolimus eluting coronary stent (drug-eluting stent, DES)
Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation
Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of either:
\- a XIENCE® V everolimus eluting coronary stent in one of the following sizes: 3.0 x 18 mm, 3.0 x 28 mm, 2.5 x 18 mm, 2.5 x 28 mm (DES group),
or:
\- a Coroflex Blue® coronary stent postdilated with a Sequent Please® paclitaxel-eluting balloon in one of the following size combinations (stent / balloon): 3.0 x 16 mm / 3.0 x 20 mm, 3.0 x 25 mm / 3.0 x 30 mm, 2.5 x 16 mm / 2.5 x 20 mm, 2.5 x 25 mm / 2.5 x 30 mm (BMS/DEB group)
BMS/DEB
Implantation of a Coroflex Blue® coronary stent (bare metal stent, BMS) postdilated with a Sequent Please® paclitaxel-eluting balloon (drug-eluting balloon, DEB)
Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation
Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of either:
\- a XIENCE® V everolimus eluting coronary stent in one of the following sizes: 3.0 x 18 mm, 3.0 x 28 mm, 2.5 x 18 mm, 2.5 x 28 mm (DES group),
or:
\- a Coroflex Blue® coronary stent postdilated with a Sequent Please® paclitaxel-eluting balloon in one of the following size combinations (stent / balloon): 3.0 x 16 mm / 3.0 x 20 mm, 3.0 x 25 mm / 3.0 x 30 mm, 2.5 x 16 mm / 2.5 x 20 mm, 2.5 x 25 mm / 2.5 x 30 mm (BMS/DEB group)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation
Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of either:
\- a XIENCE® V everolimus eluting coronary stent in one of the following sizes: 3.0 x 18 mm, 3.0 x 28 mm, 2.5 x 18 mm, 2.5 x 28 mm (DES group),
or:
\- a Coroflex Blue® coronary stent postdilated with a Sequent Please® paclitaxel-eluting balloon in one of the following size combinations (stent / balloon): 3.0 x 16 mm / 3.0 x 20 mm, 3.0 x 25 mm / 3.0 x 30 mm, 2.5 x 16 mm / 2.5 x 20 mm, 2.5 x 25 mm / 2.5 x 30 mm (BMS/DEB group)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \> 18 years, written consent
* Native coronary lesion suitable for stent placement and OCT imaging
Exclusion Criteria
* Co-morbidity with an estimated life expectancy of \< 50 % at 1 year
* Scheduled major surgery in the next 6 months
* Not able to give informed written consent or non-compliance
* Participation in other PCI trial
* Acute coronary syndromes and cardiogenic shock
* Previous subacute or late coronary stent thrombosis
* Known non-responsiveness / allergy to aspirin or thienopyridines
* Known allergy against everolimus or against taxol derivates
* Culprit lesion within the proximal 10 mm of the right or left coronary artery
* Saphenous vein grafts
* Estimated stent length \> 30 mm
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
B. Braun Melsungen AG
INDUSTRY
Abbott Medical Devices
INDUSTRY
Boston Scientific Corporation
INDUSTRY
University of Jena
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tudor C. Poerner
PD Dr. med.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tudor C Poerner, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Jena University Hospital
Hans R Figulla, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Jena University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital of Jena, 1st Medical Department, Division of Cardiology
Jena, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Poerner TC, Otto S, Gassdorf J, Nitsche K, Janiak F, Scheller B, Goebel B, Jung C, Figulla HR. Stent coverage and neointimal proliferation in bare metal stents postdilated with a Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stents: prospective randomized study using optical coherence tomography at 6-month follow-up. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec;7(6):760-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001146. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
Poerner TC, Otto S, Gassdorf J, Janiak F, Danzer C, Ferrari M, Figulla HR. A prospective randomised study using optical coherence tomography to assess endothelial coverage and neointimal proliferation at 6-months after implantation of a coronary everolimus-eluting stent compared with a bare metal stent postdilated with a paclitaxel-eluting balloon (OCTOPUS Trial): rationale, design and methods. EuroIntervention. 2011 May;7 Suppl K:K93-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7SKA16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UKJ-TCP-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.