Observational Study With Investigation of Two Second Generation Laryngeal Masks

NCT ID: NCT02566291

Last Updated: 2017-01-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

364 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In a observational study the second-generation laryngeal masks LMA Supreme and Ambu AuraGain are investigated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After approval from the local ethics committee, data were collected in a prospective, non- randomised study over a three-month period. When contra-indications for laryngeal mask use were absent anaesthesiologists used either Supreme (Teleflex Medical GmbH, Germany) or Gain (Ambu GmbH, Germany). Endpoints were the success rate and time to insertion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Remodeling

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Supreme Group

Measuring Success rate and Insertion Time

Success

Intervention Type DEVICE

Success rate and time for insertion

Gain Group

Measuring Success rate and Insertion Time

Success

Intervention Type DEVICE

Success rate and time for insertion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Success

Success rate and time for insertion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 Years
* No concurrent participation in another study
* capacity to consent
* Present written informed consent of the research participant
* Elective surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<18 years
* Existing pregnancy
* Lack of consent
* inability to consent
* emergency patients
* Emergency situations in the context of a Difficult Airway Management
* ASA classification\> 3
* situations where the possibility of accumulated gastric contents
* Participation in another study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marc Kriege, MD

Marc Kriege, MD; Rüdiger Noppens, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marc MK Kriege, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University JG, Mainz

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anaesthesiology;

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Russo SG, Cremer S, Galli T, Eich C, Brauer A, Crozier TA, Bauer M, Strack M. Randomized comparison of the i-gel, the LMA Supreme, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2012 Aug 7;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-12-18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22871204 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SGA 2014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.