A Comparison Between Conventional Surgery and Piezosurgery
NCT ID: NCT02495207
Last Updated: 2017-07-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-06-30
2017-04-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Piezoelectric Surgery on Pain, Comfort, and Patient Satisfaction in Third Molar Surgery
NCT06971653
Effect of Piezoelectric Surgery onPostoperative Complications in Third Molar Surgery
NCT06965855
A New Piezoelectric Technique in Third Molar Surgery
NCT06212232
Comparison of Piezoelectric and Conventional Surgery for Germectomy of the Lower Third Molar
NCT06778590
Piezoelectric and Conventional Rotary Techniques in Third Molar Surgery: Postoperative Outcomes and Quality of Life
NCT07185620
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional Surgery
No intervention in this arm. The patients are going to undergo normal surgical intervention. Conventional surgery will be performed to extract the impacted third molars.
No interventions assigned to this group
Piezosurgery
Patients here will undergo a piezosurgery to extract their third molars on both sides.
Piezosurgery
This intervention is dependent on use of piezosurgery to conduct the required bone cuts to remove third molars.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Piezosurgery
This intervention is dependent on use of piezosurgery to conduct the required bone cuts to remove third molars.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Smokers
* Infectious diseases
* Infections around third molars (i.e. pericoronitis).
* Alcoholic patients
16 Years
35 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Damascus University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ahmad Al-buzem, DDS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MSc student, Oral and Maxillofacial Department, University of Damascus Dental School
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Damascus Dental School
Damascus, Damscus, Syria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sivolella S, Berengo M, Bressan E, Di Fiore A, Stellini E. Osteotomy for lower third molar germectomy: randomized prospective crossover clinical study comparing piezosurgery and conventional rotatory osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jun;69(6):e15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.036. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
Mantovani E, Arduino PG, Schierano G, Ferrero L, Gallesio G, Mozzati M, Russo A, Scully C, Carossa S. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower wisdom tooth removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):1890-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 13.
Rullo R, Addabbo F, Papaccio G, D'Aquino R, Festa VM. Piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery: relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain with histological evaluations. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;41(2):e33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
Gulnahar Y, Huseyin Kosger H, Tutar Y. A comparison of piezosurgery and conventional surgery by heat shock protein 70 expression. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;42(4):508-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.10.027. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
Gulnahar Y, Kosger HH, Tutar Y. The role of preoperative oxidative stress and mandibular third molar postoperative outcome--reply. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Nov;42(11):1500-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 1. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UDDS-OMFS-03-2015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.