The Effect of Saline Irrigation at Different Temperatures on Pain, Edema, and Trismus After Impacted Third Molar Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05170516

Last Updated: 2022-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-15

Study Completion Date

2020-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Third molar surgery is one of the most common procedures in oral surgery and the most common postoperative complications are swelling, pain, and trismus. This study aims to evaluate the postoperative morbidity (pain, swelling, and trismus) in third molar surgery performed using different degrees of cooled and room temperature irrigation solutions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This single-blind, single- centre, split-mouth, superiority randomized prospective clinical trial was approved by The Ethics Committee of Trakya University, Medical Sciences (Decision no: 13/10). The sample size calculation based on data obtained from a previous study indicated that 48 patients would be sufficient per group (80% power and 5% significance level).

Adult patients (18 - 59 years of age) referred to the Trakya University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery between September 2018 and December 2020 were examined clinically and radiographically.

Inclusion criteria:

1. Patients who fit the requirements of the study such as attending follow up sessions and signing the informed consent.
2. Patients who had bilateral asymptomatic vertical third molar teeth with impaction of class I, level C (21).
3. Patients who had no significant medical diseases or use of drugs, were not pregnant, had no allergy, and did not smoke.

A patient was excluded if any of the following conditions were observed:

1. Patients who have a complicating systemic disease (ASA: 3- 6).
2. Patients who have second molars with severe periodontal defect or deep periodontal pocket (probing depth \>4mm)
3. Patients who have a poor oral hygiene
4. Patients who have history of having taken analgesics 12 h or antibiotics 1 month before.

Fourty eight patients were randomly allocated to two groups (Group A and B)(n =24). For randomization, a dentist blinded to the study took a sealed envelope from the bag, which contained group codes. Bilateral impacted third molars (a total of 96 teeth) were extracted from each patient in 2 different operation time. The second operation that was performed at least 21 days after the first ones to return the variables to preoperative values. Each patient had an experimental (one side with 4°C or 10°C saline irrigation) and control (the other side with 25°C saline irrigation ) group impacted third molars.

All procedures were completed by a single operator who had ten years of experience. Inferior alveolar nerve, lingual and buccal nerve blocks were performed using a local anesthetic containing 0.006 mg/ml adrenaline hydrochloride and 40 mg/ml articaine hydrochloride (2 ml Ultracaine® D-S Ampul, Sanofi Aventis). The flap was released with a triangular incision. Osteotomies were made with a 1.6 mm round bur attached to a surgical high-speed handpiece (W\&H Implantmed, W\&H, St Albans, UK) at 20000 rpm under saline irrigation at the temperature determined according to the groups.

During operations, the temperatures of the salines were verified with a non-contact thermometer (Omron Gentle Temp 720 MC, Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) every 30 seconds. When temperature changes were detected, the correct temperature was achieved with the addition of cooled irrigation. After tooth extraction flap was sutured with a 3.0 silk suture which was removed 7 days after the surgery. The operation time was determined as the time between the first incision and the last suture and recorded.

Biting a gauze pack for 30 minutes, an ice pack compression (5 minutes on and 5 minutes off) for 6 hours, and having a soft and cold diet for 24 hours were recommended. Amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times/day for 5 days and 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate mouthwash 3 times/day for 7 days were prescribed. The patients were also advised to take paracetamol 500 mg as required.

Assessment of postoperative pain before participation, all patients had read and signed an informed consent form. All patients were given a pain form to report the level of postoperative pain. Before the beginning of treatment, the clinician filled in an example of a pain report with each patient to confirm that they understood the instructions. Postoperative pain was evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from "0" (as no pain) to "10" (as the most severe pain experienced) for postoperative 7 days. And also patients were asked to record the number of analgesics they used in 1 day for 7 days. Patients were not aware of the side and the type of cooled irrigation in order not to affect VAS scores and the total number of analgesics.

Postoperative measurements were made by a single surgeon blinded to operative procedures. Patients were recalled on the 24th and 72nd hours and 7th days postoperatively, and trismus and facial swelling measurements were made.

The level of facial swelling was determined by a method described by Üstün et. al. (22). To assess facial swelling, three measurements between 5 reference points were performed with a flexible ruler: tragus to soft tissue pogonion, lateral corner of the eye to the angle of the mandible, and tragus to the outer corner of the mouth. The sum of the 3 measurements was calculated preoperatively and repeated on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7. The difference between each postoperative measurement and the preoperative measurement was determined as the value for facial swelling.

Trismus was assessed by measuring the distance between the mesial incisal corners of the right upper and lower central teeth when the patient had maximum mouth opening on postoperative 1, 3, 7 days. The difference between each postoperative measurement and the preoperative measurement indicated the trismus for that day.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Impacted Third Molar Tooth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental Group A

In experimental group A, 4°C saline irrigation was used for removal of the bone surrounding the right or left third molars.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

4 °C colled saline irrigation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In Experimental Group A , 4 °C colled saline irrigation was used during impacted third molar surgery

Experimental Group B

In experimental group B, 10°C saline irrigation was used for removal of the bone surrounding the right or left third molars.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

10 °C cooled saline irrigation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Experimental Group B, 10°C colled saline irrigation was used during impacted third molar surgery.

Control Group A

In control group A, room temperature saline was used for the other side extractions of patients whose impacted tooth was extracted under 4 °C saline irrigation on one side.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Room temperature saline irrigation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In Control Group A and B, salin irrigation at room temperature was used during impacted third molar surgery.

Control Group B

In control group B, room temperature saline was used for the other side extractions of patients whose impacted tooth was extracted under 10 °C saline irrigation on one side.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Room temperature saline irrigation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In Control Group A and B, salin irrigation at room temperature was used during impacted third molar surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

4 °C colled saline irrigation

In Experimental Group A , 4 °C colled saline irrigation was used during impacted third molar surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

10 °C cooled saline irrigation

Experimental Group B, 10°C colled saline irrigation was used during impacted third molar surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Room temperature saline irrigation

In Control Group A and B, salin irrigation at room temperature was used during impacted third molar surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Volunteers over the age of 18
* Patients who had no significant medical diseases or use of drugs, were not pregnant, had no allergy, and did not smoke.
* Patients who had bilateral asymptomatic vertical third molar teeth with impaction of class I, level C according to Pell and Gregory Classification, and no history of recent antibiotic or anti-inflammatory treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who had symptomatic impacted third molars.
* Patients who had a medical history described above.
* Patients under the age of 18.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Trakya University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fatma Gülfeşan Çanakçi

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

F. Gülfeşan Çanakçi

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Trakya University, Faculty of Dentistry

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Trakya University

Edirne, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TrakyaU 2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.