Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort Associated With Two Techniques of Corticotomy

NCT ID: NCT05040945

Last Updated: 2021-09-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-15

Study Completion Date

2019-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to estimate the levels of pain and discomfort associated with the en-masse retraction of the six upper anterior teeth and assisted by either conventional or flapless corticotomy.

Thirty-four adult patients exhibiting class П division 1 malocclusion will be randomly allocated to either the conventional corticotomy group or the flapless corticotomy group, and they will be treated by extraction of maxillary first premolars with applying mini-screws between maxillary second premolar and first molar as temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). The levels of pain and discomfort will be rated after 24 hours of corticotomy (T1), four days (T2), seven days (T3), 14 days (T4) and after 28 days of corticotomy, by asking the patients to fill in a questionnaire for assessing levels of pain and discomfort.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Increasing the treatment duration is one of the most important difficulties facing the orthodontist. Several therapeutic procedures accompanying orthodontic treatment have been introduced in order to reduce the treatment duration and the most important one is the corticotomy. Although traditional corticotomy proved to be effective in accelerating different types of tooth movement, it is considered aggressive in nature. Hence, there is an interest to develop minimally invasive surgical techniques. These techniques include the flapless corticotomy using the piezosurgery device.

In flapless corticotomy group, vertical soft-tissue incisions will be made on the buccal and palatal gingiva. One incision will be made between the roots of the six upper anterior teeth, and two incisions will be made between the upper canines and second premolars. The incisions will be 5 mm long and started 4 mm apical to the interdental papilla. Then a piezosurgery knife will be inserted to perform the cortical alveolar incisions with 3-mm in-depth and 8-mm in length. No suturing will be needed.

In traditional corticotomy group, a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, extended from the distal side of the second premolar on the right side to the same position on the left side without performing any vertical releasing incisions. The full-thickness flap will be extended 3 mm above the root apices, from the buccal and palatal sides. Then, one vertical incision between the roots of upper anterior teeth and two vertical incisions in the site of first premolar extraction will be made by the piezosurgery knife. The vertical incisions will be connected by a horizontal incision using the piezosurgery knives. The vertical incisions will be 3 mm in depth, starting 2-3 mm apical to the alveolar crest, and extending 3 mm beyond the root apices. The interrupted technique of suturing will be done using a non-absorbent 3-0 black silk.

The levels of pain and discomfort will be rated after 24 hours of corticotomy (T1), four days (T2), seven days (T3), 14 days (T4) and after 28 days of corticotomy, by asking the patients to fill in a questionnaire based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and patient's responses will be obtained regarding their feelings of pain, discomfort, swelling, mastication and swallowing difficulties, jaw movement restriction, satisfaction and recommend the procedure to a friend.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Traditional corticotomy

Adult patients will be treated by en-masse retraction associated with traditional corticotomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Traditional corticotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Adult patients will be treated by extraction of maxillary first premolars with applying mini-screws between maxillary second premolar and first molar as temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). Then en-masse retraction associated with traditional corticotomy will be applied.

Flapless corticotomy

Adult patients will be treated by en-masse retraction associated with flapless corticotomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Flapless corticotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Adult patients will be treated by extraction of maxillary first premolars with applying mini-screws between maxillary second premolar and first molar as temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). Then en-masse retraction associated with flapless corticotomy will be applied.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Traditional corticotomy

Adult patients will be treated by extraction of maxillary first premolars with applying mini-screws between maxillary second premolar and first molar as temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). Then en-masse retraction associated with traditional corticotomy will be applied.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Flapless corticotomy

Adult patients will be treated by extraction of maxillary first premolars with applying mini-screws between maxillary second premolar and first molar as temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). Then en-masse retraction associated with flapless corticotomy will be applied.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age range between 18 and 30 years.
2. Class II division 1 malocclusion requiring extraction of upper first premolars.
3. Mild to moderate skeletal class II malocclusion.
4. Normal or excessive anterior facial height.
5. No or mild crowding (tooth-size arch-length discrepancy ≤3 mm).
6. Overjet \>5 mm and \<10 mm.
7. Completion permanent dentition (regardless of third molars).
8. No previous orthodontic treatment.
9. No drug use or systematic disease that would affect the bone and tooth movement rate.
10. Healthy periodontium and good oral hygiene.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with previous orthodontic treatment.
2. Patients with severe skeletal dysplasia in all three dimensions.
3. Patients suffer from systemic diseases or syndromes
4. Patients on medication for systemic disorders, pregnancy or steroid therapy.
5. Patients showing any signs of active periodontal disease
6. Patients with severe crowding (≥ 3.5 mm) in maxillary arch
7. Patients with missing or extracted teeth in maxillary arch except third molar.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Damascus University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hanin Nizar Khlef, DDS,MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Specialist and Clinical Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus

Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS,MSc,PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria

Omar Heshmeh, DDS,MSc,PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School

Damascus, , Syria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Syria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):275-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt046. Epub 2013 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23787192 (View on PubMed)

Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O. En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth in Adult Patients with Maxillary or Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):113-127.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31058623 (View on PubMed)

Alfawal AMH, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Hamadah O, Brad B, Latifeh Y. Evaluation of patient-centered outcomes associated with the acceleration of canine retraction by using minimally invasive surgical procedures: A randomized clinical controlled trial. Dent Med Probl. 2020 Jul-Sep;57(3):285-293. doi: 10.17219/dmp/120181.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32909702 (View on PubMed)

Gibreal O, Hajeer MY, Brad B. Evaluation of the levels of pain and discomfort of piezocision-assisted flapless corticotomy when treating severely crowded lower anterior teeth: a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0758-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30991984 (View on PubMed)

Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O, Youssef N, Mahaini L. The effectiveness of traditional corticotomy vs flapless corticotomy in miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion: A single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Dec;158(6):e111-e120. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33158633 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UDDS-Ortho-08-2021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Jaw Muscle Pain Post Wisdom Molar Surgery
NCT07094542 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2
Use of Corticosteroids in Third Molar Surgery
NCT05752305 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3