Evaluation of Maxillary and Mandibulary Nerve Blocks on Morphine Consumption

NCT ID: NCT03299998

Last Updated: 2017-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

92 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-25

Study Completion Date

2017-08-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background and Objectives: Double-jaw surgery is one of the most painful oral surgery, requiring multimodal analgesia including controlled morphine pump and its secondary effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of face block (mandibulary and maxillary block analgesia) on the first 24 hours on morphine consumption in patients admitted for double jaw surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Methods: Patients undergoing double-jaw surgery between January 2015 and May 2017 were enrolled. Patients were separated into 2 groups: patients receiving maxillary-mandibulary nerve block and those no receiving it. The primary endpoint was the morphine consumption within 24 hours post-surgery. Secondary endpoints were the intra-operative remifentanil consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting at 24 hours, morphine consumption in recovery room, length of stay in hospital.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dento Facial Dysmorphism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BLOCK+

Patients who underwent maxillary and mandibulary block before surgery

Maxillary and mandibular blocks

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A Pajunk SonoPlex Stim needle 22G x 55 mm was used. For maxillary nerve block, needle was introduced next to the angle of the orbitae and the zygomatic ridge. The needle was sank until coming into contact of the temporal bone. It was then orientated to the controlateral nostril and sank of 1 cm. For mandibular block, needle was introduced in the pterygoid fossa under and perpendicularly to the zygomatic arch, and sank until the pterygoid process. The needle was then orientated towards controlateral orbitae and sank with neurostimulation. After a motor response at 0.6 milliampere (mA) and the disappearance of contraction at 0.3 mA, local mixture was injected. The mixing of local anesthesia was made of ropivacaine 5 mg/mL and clonidine 30 µg. Five mL were injected in every block for a total of 20 mL.

General anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anesthesia was standardized and provided using intravenous administration of propofol and remifentanil. Patients were mechanically ventilated with a mixture of air (50/50), and desflurane or sevoflurane, or Target-controlled infusion (TCI) propofol. One to 5 mg/kg of methyl-prednisolone were administered to reduce inflammatory response.

BLOCK -

Patients who did not undergo maxillary and mandibulary block before surgery.

General anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anesthesia was standardized and provided using intravenous administration of propofol and remifentanil. Patients were mechanically ventilated with a mixture of air (50/50), and desflurane or sevoflurane, or Target-controlled infusion (TCI) propofol. One to 5 mg/kg of methyl-prednisolone were administered to reduce inflammatory response.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Maxillary and mandibular blocks

A Pajunk SonoPlex Stim needle 22G x 55 mm was used. For maxillary nerve block, needle was introduced next to the angle of the orbitae and the zygomatic ridge. The needle was sank until coming into contact of the temporal bone. It was then orientated to the controlateral nostril and sank of 1 cm. For mandibular block, needle was introduced in the pterygoid fossa under and perpendicularly to the zygomatic arch, and sank until the pterygoid process. The needle was then orientated towards controlateral orbitae and sank with neurostimulation. After a motor response at 0.6 milliampere (mA) and the disappearance of contraction at 0.3 mA, local mixture was injected. The mixing of local anesthesia was made of ropivacaine 5 mg/mL and clonidine 30 µg. Five mL were injected in every block for a total of 20 mL.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

General anesthesia

Anesthesia was standardized and provided using intravenous administration of propofol and remifentanil. Patients were mechanically ventilated with a mixture of air (50/50), and desflurane or sevoflurane, or Target-controlled infusion (TCI) propofol. One to 5 mg/kg of methyl-prednisolone were administered to reduce inflammatory response.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Male and female who underwent double jaw surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* opposition to the study
* an additional surgical procedure
* preoperative consumption of morphine or derived from morphine
* perioperative N20
Eligible Sex

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospices Civils de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRC_GHN_2017_001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id