Neural and Psychological Mechanisms of Pain Perception

NCT ID: NCT02446262

Last Updated: 2026-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-11

Study Completion Date

2026-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:

\- Painful stimuli cause changes in a network of brain regions called the "Pain Matrix." But most of these regions respond to many other stimuli, not just pain. Researchers want to understand how different factors influence pain. They want to test what happens when people expect different levels of pain and receive treatments that can modify pain. They want to see if these factors influence decisions about pain and how the body responds to it. They also want to compare pain with responses like taste and vision.

Objectives:

\- To better understand how pain and emotions are processed and influenced by psychological factors.

Eligibility:

\- Healthy volunteers ages 18-50.

Design:

* This study requires 1 to 2 clinic visits that last 1 to 3 hours.
* Participants will be screened with medical history and physical exam.
* Some participants will have one or more magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of their brain. For MRI, participants will lie on a table that slides in and out of a cylinder. The scanner makes loud knocking noises. They will get earplugs.
* Participants heart activity will be recorded with electrocardiogram. Their pulse, sweating, and breathing will be monitored.
* Some participants will take a taste test. Others may perform simple tasks. Others may receive pain in their arm, leg, or hand. The pain will come from heat or electric shocks. Others may judge pain using a topical pain-relieving cream. Some of these tests may be given during MRI.
* Participants will fill out questionnaires.
* The study will last 3 years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective

Pain is one of the most important signals for an organism s survival. The pathways that transfer noxious input from the periphery to the central nervous system are highly conserved across human and animal models. In humans, the ultimate experience of pain is also highly influenced by psychological factors. For example, the placebo effect leads to robust pain relief and can influence responses to noxious stimuli in the human brain. However, the psychological and neurobiological mechanisms by which psychological factors influence pain remain largely unknown.

Pain can be modulated by explicit beliefs about treatments, prior experience and learning, interpersonal processes that support the patient-provider relationship, and contextual factors related to the treatment environment. In the proposed series of experiments, we will systematically investigate the neural and psychological mechanisms that mediate the effects of these factors on acute pain. We will focus on expectations, attention, emotion, conditioning/associative learning, and social factors. These experiments will principally use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and psychophysiological measurements, as well as behavioral assays and self-reports. We will examine the effects of different types of pain-related expectations on decisions about pain as well as responses in the brain and periphery. We will also compare acute pain with other hedonic and perceptual processes. This will allow us to distinguish processes that are unique to pain perception from those that are not specific to pain, such as processes involved in perception and decision-making across domains.

Together, the proposed series of experiments aim to elucidate the psychological, neurobiological, and physiological mechanisms that modulate pain. This, in turn, can identify targets for pain treatment and inform mechanistic studies of altered pain processing in clinical populations.

Study Population

We plan to recruit 500 healthy volunteers between age 18 and 50.

Design

The aim of the proposed series of experiments is to understand how expectations, attention, and emotion influence acute pain. We will manipulate expectations about noxious stimuli using associative learning and verbal instructions, in both within-subjects and between-groups designs. We will measure decisions about pain experience (self-report) as well as neural and physiological responses to noxious stimuli that cause pain. We will combine computational modeling with advanced neuroimaging analyses to isolate the neural and psychological mechanisms that mediate the effects of expectations, attention, and emotion on subjective pain. To determine the specificity of these mechanisms, we will compare acute pain modalities (e.g., thermal pain versus shock-induced pain), and we will contrast pain with other hedonic and perceptual domains (e.g., taste).

Outcome measures

Dependent variables for all experiments will include decisions about pain and/or other percepts (e.g., sweetness of a taste) measured with visual analogue scales, reaction time, physiological responses (e.g., skin conductance, pupil dilation), and/or BOLD activation in regions of interest. We are specifically interested in processes within the network of regions known to be involved in pain processing (pain-processing network, PPN), as well as responses in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), ventral striatum (VS), and amygdala. We hypothesize that nociceptive stimuli and pain ratings will be associated with unique patterns of activation within the PPN, whereas responses in regions associated with value, executive function, and decision-making will be common across outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Normal Physiology Healthy Volunteers

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Substudy 1: Instructed subjects

Participants are instructed about outcomes

Group Type OTHER

Instructions

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In sub-study 1, half the participants are instructed about outcomes, half learn through experience.

Substudy 1: Uninstructed subjects

Participants learn through experience

Group Type OTHER

Instructions

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In sub-study 1, half the participants are instructed about outcomes, half learn through experience.

Substudy 2: heat group

Participants learn about heat outcomes through conditioning

Group Type OTHER

Thermal Pain

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In sub-studies 2 and 3, participants are exposed to thermal stimuli and/or tastants (sugar water, salt water, neutral rinse) and we are measuring how learning varies based on the type of outcome.

Substudy 2: salt group

Participants learn about salt outcomes through conditioning

Group Type OTHER

Thermal Pain

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In sub-studies 2 and 3, participants are exposed to thermal stimuli and/or tastants (sugar water, salt water, neutral rinse) and we are measuring how learning varies based on the type of outcome.

Substudy 2: sugar group

Participants learn about sugar outcomes through conditioning

Group Type OTHER

Thermal Pain

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In sub-studies 2 and 3, participants are exposed to thermal stimuli and/or tastants (sugar water, salt water, neutral rinse) and we are measuring how learning varies based on the type of outcome.

Substudy 3: healthy volunteers

All participants experience all outcomes, within subjects designs

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Substudy 4: healthy volunteers

Participants are instructed to attend toward or away from the stimulus

Group Type OTHER

Attention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In sub-study 4, participants learn about outcomes and we manipulate attention toward or away from the pain.

Substudy 5: healthy volunteers

Participants experience both placebo and cue-based expectations within subjects

Group Type OTHER

Placebo instructions

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In sub-study 5, we test whether placebo effects and expectancy cues modulate pain through similar mechanisms.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Instructions

In sub-study 1, half the participants are instructed about outcomes, half learn through experience.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Attention

In sub-study 4, participants learn about outcomes and we manipulate attention toward or away from the pain.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Thermal Pain

In sub-studies 2 and 3, participants are exposed to thermal stimuli and/or tastants (sugar water, salt water, neutral rinse) and we are measuring how learning varies based on the type of outcome.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Placebo instructions

In sub-study 5, we test whether placebo effects and expectancy cues modulate pain through similar mechanisms.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy
* Between 18 and 50 years old
* Fluent in English
* Able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits.
* Has a major medical condition or medical history that in a clinician's assessment could affect heat sensitivity, pain thresholds, or ability to comply with study procedures. This may include cardiovascular, autonomic, or neurological conditions, including stroke, blindness, deafness, a history of brain damage, or a chronic systemic disease (e.g., diabetes).
* Has a current mood disorder, anxiety disorder, or substance use disorder, or has a history of psychosis, hospitalization for a mental health condition, or recurrent psychiatric episodes.
* Has a medical condition that in a clinician's assessment might affect somatosensation (e.g., Raynaud s disease, peripheral neuropathy, or circulatory disorder).
* Has a current chronic pain condition or has had chronic pain in the past (painful condition lasting more than six months).
* Has a dermatological condition affecting the testing region such as scars, burns, or recent tattoos that might influence cutaneous sensibility.
* Regular use of prescription medication that has a significant effect on pain or heat perception. Excluded medications include central-acting agents such as opiates (morphine, tramadol), antidepressants (amitriptyline, duloxetine, milnacipran), anticonvulsants (gabapentin, pregabalin), anxiolytics (barbituates, benzodiazepines), hypnotics (zolpidem, sodium oxybate), antipsychotics (valproate, lithium, olanzapine), antimigraine agents (sumatriptan, ergotamine), and muscle relaxants (cyclobenzaprine, carisoprodol). Use of analgesic medications, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, salicylates, and acetaminophen, taken on an "as needed" basis is acceptable as long as the last dose taken was within 5 half-lives of testing.
* Is pregnant.
* NIH staff member who is a subordinate/relative/co-worker of any investigator on the protocol.


* Individuals with conditions that could pose a risk relating to the safety of the fMRI procedure or pain stimulation will be excluded from the MRI portion of the protocol, but may participate in the non-fMRI sessions (with the exception of pregnant women). Such conditions include:

* Those with ferromagnetic metal in the cranial cavity or eye, e.g. aneurysm clip, implanted neural stimulator, cochlear implant, ocular foreign body.
* Those with an abnormality on a structural MRI.
* Those with an implanted cardiac pacemaker or auto-defibrillator.
* Those with an insulin pump.
* Those with irremovable body piercing.
* Pregnant women (based on urine test completed within 24 hours prior to scan).
* Individuals who are left-handed (based on self-report or score on handedness questionnaire) will be excluded from fMRI substudies.


-Participation in an NIH study of analgesia, as gleaned from CRIS.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lauren Y Atlas, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Adebisi O Ayodele, C.R.N.P.

Role: CONTACT

(240) 593-4226

Lauren Y Atlas, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

(301) 827-0214

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

For more information at the NIH Clinical Center contact Office of Patient Recruitment (OPR)

Role: primary

800-411-1222 ext. TTY dial 711

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Atlas LY, Dildine TC, Palacios-Barrios EE, Yu Q, Reynolds RC, Banker LA, Grant SS, Pine DS. Instructions and experiential learning have similar impacts on pain and pain-related brain responses but produce dissociations in value-based reversal learning. Elife. 2022 Nov 1;11:e73353. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73353.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36317867 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15-AT-0132

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

150132

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

N-of-few Study of Pain Perception
NCT04664400 COMPLETED NA
Modulation of Painful Perception
NCT02528578 COMPLETED NA