Therapeutic Strategies During Exposure to Pain in an Experimental Design

NCT ID: NCT03146832

Last Updated: 2017-07-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

139 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-01

Study Completion Date

2017-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of the present study is to compare different therapeutic strategies (according to habituation model vs. according to the inhibitory learning approach) during exposure to thermal pain in an experimental design.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Exposure therapy is effective for the treatment of individuals with chronic pain and high levels of fear-avoidance. Nevertheless, mechanisms of change for exposure treatment are not sufficiently investigated. According to the habituation model, the activation of a fear structure leads to a habituation of the initial physical response. Therefore, the therapeutic recommendation is to focus on the reduction of fear during exposure sessions. According to the inhibitory learning approach, however, exposure experiences compete with the original US-CS fear association. Therefore, the therapist should maximize the violation of negative expectancies. The present study intends to compare both strategies during the exposure to pain in an experimental design.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

participants are assigned to one of three experimental groups in parallel for the duration of the study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants were not aware which experimental condition they were allocated to.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Habituation

The habituation instruction focuses on changes of the initial physical fear-responses during exposure sessions. It is explained that the level of anxiety will gradually decrease, or habituate, each time someone faces a feared situation. Participants are then instructed to observe their own level of fear during the three practice trials with the thermode. Together with the experimenter, participants have to indicate their level of arousal on an 11-point scale (0= neutral, 10 = very high) in-between and after the three practice trials. After the practice trial, participants are instructed to reconsider their own development of physical responses. Participants are encouraged to remember the development of their level of arousal during the test trail with the thermode.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exposure therapy (according to habituation approach)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Exposure instruction focuses on fear reduction during exposure sessions

Expectation Violation

The expectation violation instruction focuses on the verification of negative expectancies during exposures sessions. It is explained that exposure exercises help to create own experiences which allow to directly test negative predicted outcomes. Together with the experimenter, participants are then encouraged to formulate concrete concerns in regard to the practice trail with the thermode. Before the practice trails, participants have to indicate the likelihood of their concerns on an 11-point scale (0= not likely, 10 = very likely). After the practice trails, participants are instructed to evaluate their own concerns by some guided questions (e.g. "What did you learn?"). Participants are encouraged to keep their own experience in mind during the test trail with the thermode.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exposure therapy (according to inhibitory learning approach)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Exposure instruction focuses on expectation violation during exposure sessions

Control

Participants in the control group are not provided with information about exposure therapy. Instead, participants listen to a newspaper article which reports on the daily work in a botanical garden. Together with the experimenter, participants are then asked to name the most interesting aspect in the article. Before the practice trails, participants have to rate how likely it is that they would further inform themselves about botanical gardens on an 11-point scale (0= not likely, 10 = very likely). After the practice trails, participants are provided with some further questions about the newspaper article (e.g. "Did you find the newspaper article interesting?"). This cognitive exercise does not cover any pain-related topics and, therefore, does not serve as a distraction instruction.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exposure therapy (according to habituation approach)

Exposure instruction focuses on fear reduction during exposure sessions

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Exposure therapy (according to inhibitory learning approach)

Exposure instruction focuses on expectation violation during exposure sessions

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* female gender
* sufficient knowledge of German language

Exclusion Criteria

* chronic and acute pain conditions
* Raynaud's disease
* high blood pressure
* neuropathy, coronary diseases
* diabetes, current alcohol
* drug or pain-medication (last 24hours)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Philipps University Marburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Julia Anna Glombiewski

Ph.D, Licensed Psychologist, Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Julia Anna Glombiewski, Phd

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Philipps University Marburg, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-33v

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Self-Compassion and Acute Pain
NCT03647683 COMPLETED NA
Pain, Learning, and Nocebo
NCT04762836 COMPLETED NA