The Interaction Between Conditioned Pain Modulation and Expectation in Understanding the Placebo Effect of Pain Reduction
NCT ID: NCT03484728
Last Updated: 2021-05-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-27
2020-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Physiological, Cognitive, and Personal Features in the Link Between Placebo-effect and Variability of Pain Reports
NCT05994118
Pain Acceptance Training in Patients Experiencing Emotional Distress and Somatic Symptoms: Examination of Dialectical Thinking as a Mediating Factor
NCT07067619
Psychobiological Mechanisms of Placebo and Nocebo Effects in the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain
NCT02157389
The Influence of Expectations, Attention and the Test Paradigm on the Efficacy of the Pain Processing System
NCT05161286
Pain-related Fear as a Facilitator of Nocebo Hyperalgesia
NCT04197154
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Placebo effects are inherent to every treatment and significantly contribute to clinical outcomes even in the presence of strong verum analgesic effects. From a psychological point of view, a series of recent studies supported the nature of the placebo effect as a learning phenomenon wherein verbally-induced expectations, cued and contextual conditioning or social learning are considered as the core mechanisms to produce a benefit. Placebo analgesic effects can be elicited by verbal instructions that generate anticipation for a benefit, thus creating expectations of analgesia. The effect of placebo is, primarily mediated by mu-receptors associated opioidergic neurotransmission. Alike brain structures activated by placebo manipulations, prefrontal cortex, cingulate cortex, PAG and RVM are the most important brain structures involved in initiating of opioid-mediated anti-nociception.
An interesting question that emerges is the extent of overlap between the serotono-noradrenergic analgesia represented by CPM, and opioidergic analgesia represented by expectation-based placebo manipulation, for pain reduction. It seems that the final pathway for the two systems is the descending analgesia tract(s). It is unclear, though, if such final common pathway dictates a limited analgesic effect, i.e., it can only be activated to a certain extent, regardless of which system activates it, and therefore additive effects of expectation and CPM are limited to a certain ceiling. Alternatively, different tracts of descending pain inhibition are activated by each system, and the analgesic effect is additive.
Cognitive cortical brain potentials (especially, a P300 waveform) evoked in response to a combination of rare and frequent innocuous sensory stimuli represent a neurophysiological tool for assessment attention. As this test bases on uncertainty and the expectation of upcoming stimuli, the recording of P300 may be relevant for evaluation cognitive processes associated with expectation-related placebo analgesia.
The main aim of this study is to explore the interaction between serotono-noradrenergic and opioidergic systems of analgesia in healthy subjects. More specifically, the investigator will study whether these two systems work in an additive or a complementary way, and whether the neurophysiological assessment of individual expectation capabilities can predict the placebo magnitude.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High-expectation placebo manipulation
application of nonactive body cream on forearm for 10 minutes
placebo manipulation
application of nonactive body cream on forearm
Low-expectation placebo manipulation
application of nonactive body cream on forearm for 10 minutes
placebo manipulation
application of nonactive body cream on forearm
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
placebo manipulation
application of nonactive body cream on forearm
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* pain disorders.
18 Years
40 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rambam Health Care Campus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rambam Medical center, Neurology Department
Haifa, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
574-17_RMB_CTIL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.