The Interaction Between Conditioned Pain Modulation and Expectation in Understanding the Placebo Effect of Pain Reduction

NCT ID: NCT03484728

Last Updated: 2021-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-27

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The interaction between conditioned pain modulation and expectation in understanding the placebo effect of pain reduction

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) has recently been coined for the psychophysical protocols that assess the functioning of descending pain inhibitory pathways in humans. There is a growing body of evidence points to the important role of spinal serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) in mediation of pain inhibition via CPM. On the other hand, there is also evidence on synergistic modulatory effect of the opioidergic control on CPM, however this issue is under debates. It seems therefore, that pre-treatment CPM assessment may be relevant for prediction of analgesic drug interaction and additive effects.

Placebo effects are inherent to every treatment and significantly contribute to clinical outcomes even in the presence of strong verum analgesic effects. From a psychological point of view, a series of recent studies supported the nature of the placebo effect as a learning phenomenon wherein verbally-induced expectations, cued and contextual conditioning or social learning are considered as the core mechanisms to produce a benefit. Placebo analgesic effects can be elicited by verbal instructions that generate anticipation for a benefit, thus creating expectations of analgesia. The effect of placebo is, primarily mediated by mu-receptors associated opioidergic neurotransmission. Alike brain structures activated by placebo manipulations, prefrontal cortex, cingulate cortex, PAG and RVM are the most important brain structures involved in initiating of opioid-mediated anti-nociception.

An interesting question that emerges is the extent of overlap between the serotono-noradrenergic analgesia represented by CPM, and opioidergic analgesia represented by expectation-based placebo manipulation, for pain reduction. It seems that the final pathway for the two systems is the descending analgesia tract(s). It is unclear, though, if such final common pathway dictates a limited analgesic effect, i.e., it can only be activated to a certain extent, regardless of which system activates it, and therefore additive effects of expectation and CPM are limited to a certain ceiling. Alternatively, different tracts of descending pain inhibition are activated by each system, and the analgesic effect is additive.

Cognitive cortical brain potentials (especially, a P300 waveform) evoked in response to a combination of rare and frequent innocuous sensory stimuli represent a neurophysiological tool for assessment attention. As this test bases on uncertainty and the expectation of upcoming stimuli, the recording of P300 may be relevant for evaluation cognitive processes associated with expectation-related placebo analgesia.

The main aim of this study is to explore the interaction between serotono-noradrenergic and opioidergic systems of analgesia in healthy subjects. More specifically, the investigator will study whether these two systems work in an additive or a complementary way, and whether the neurophysiological assessment of individual expectation capabilities can predict the placebo magnitude.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

CPM was tested before and after the placebo manipulation (body cream application on forearm); based on the expectation of the cream analgesic response (high or low), two types of placebo manipulations were performed for each participant.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
The participants were told that the cream has poweful analgetic effect in one session; and that the cream has minmal analgesic effect in another session.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High-expectation placebo manipulation

application of nonactive body cream on forearm for 10 minutes

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo manipulation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

application of nonactive body cream on forearm

Low-expectation placebo manipulation

application of nonactive body cream on forearm for 10 minutes

Group Type OTHER

placebo manipulation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

application of nonactive body cream on forearm

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

placebo manipulation

application of nonactive body cream on forearm

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* healthy subjects

Exclusion Criteria

* attention deficit.
* pain disorders.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rambam Health Care Campus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rambam Medical center, Neurology Department

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

574-17_RMB_CTIL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Muscle Synergies in Pain and Pain Anticipation
NCT07251387 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Trust Game and Placebo Response
NCT02578212 COMPLETED NA
Gender, Pain, and Placebo Analgesia
NCT00314392 COMPLETED NA