Multicenter Validation on Predicting Mortality for Patients With Bleeding Peptic Ulcers
NCT ID: NCT02245802
Last Updated: 2014-09-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
785 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-08-31
2012-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
China Survey of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
NCT01241266
Early Selective TAE to Severely Bleeding Peptic Ulcers After Their Initial Endoscopic Hemostasis
NCT01142180
Survey of Non-Variceal Upper Gastro Intestinal Bleeding in Vietnamese Patients
NCT01292915
Risk Factors of Rebleeding After Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: a Nationwide Cohort Study
NCT02152904
Factors Predicting the Need for Endoscopic Intervention in Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
NCT05979025
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study objective This study aimed to validate the prediction of mortality among patients with bleeding peptic ulcers from different Asian countries.
Method Consecutive patients with bleeding peptic ulcers who presented to the study centers in Hong Kong, Japan and Taiwan were recruited after successful primary endoscopic hemostasis. The baseline demographics, ulcer characteristics, the predictive factors, 30 days mortality, rebleeding, hospital stay and need of surgery were recorded. The accuracy of prediction for adverse events including mortality and rebleeding with the prediction risk scoring system would be analysed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low risk group
CU Prediction model \< 3
No interventions assigned to this group
High risk group
CU Prediction model \>=3
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age \> 18 year old
3. Informed consent for the study and OGD
Exclusion Criteria
2. Onset more than 7 days
3. Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tokyo University
OTHER
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Tsuyama Central Hospital, Okayama
UNKNOWN
Hiroshima City Asa Hospital, Hiroshima
UNKNOWN
Mitoyo General Hospital
UNKNOWN
Okayama University
OTHER
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Philip Wai Yan Chiu
Professor, Department of Surgery, Institute of Digestive Disease
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philip Chiu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Combined Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong SAR, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chiu PW, Ng EK, Cheung FK, Chan FK, Leung WK, Wu JC, Wong VW, Yung MY, Tsoi K, Lau JY, Sung JJ, Chung SS. Predicting mortality in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers after therapeutic endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Mar;7(3):311-6; quiz 253. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.08.044. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRE-2010.207
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.