China Survey of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

NCT ID: NCT01241266

Last Updated: 2011-12-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1044 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-11-30

Study Completion Date

2011-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This will be a multicenter prospective observational study carried out in China. The investigators will collect data in a pre-specified Case Report Form. Main data from each patient will include demographics, endoscopy classification, and both endoscopy and pharmacological treatments received by patients. Data from each patient will be prospectively collected from the day the patient is diagnosed as peptic ulcer bleeding by endoscopy and receives endoscopy treatment if the investigator thinks it is needed and up to 30 days afterwards. The proportion of peptic ulcer bleeding patients who are at high risk is the primary outcome variable. High risk is defined as the patients with endoscopy Forrest classification Ia to IIb. The rate and type of endoscopic treatment, the rate of successful endoscopy treatment, the re-bleeding rate and the endoscopic re-treatment rate in high risk peptic ulcer bleeding patients will be collected. The surgery rate and mortality rate in high risk and overall patient population will be calculated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Peptic Ulcer Bleeding high risk None-Interventional Study he proportion of peptic ulcer bleeding patients who are at high risk (Forrest Ia-IIb)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Target subject population are the consecutive patients hospitalized due to peptic ulcer bleeding. Subjects should be: ≥18 years; admitted to the hospital with an overt upper GI bleed (hematemesis/coffee ground vomiting, melena, hematochezia and other clin

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female and/or male aged 18 years and above
* Admitted to the hospital with an overt upper GI bleeding (hematemesis/coffee ground vomiting, melena, hematochezia and other clinical or laboratory evidence of acute blood loss from the upper GI tract)
* Endoscopy demonstrated peptic ulcer bleeding (Forrest I-III)

Exclusion Criteria

* If participating in any clinical trial, the subject cannot take part in this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karen Atkin

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Astrazeneca China R&D

Zhaoshen Li

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Changhai Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Hefei, Anhui, China

Site Status

Research Site

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Research Site

Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China

Site Status

Research Site

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

Research Site

Xiamen, Fujian, China

Site Status

Research Site

Lanzhou, Gansu, China

Site Status

Research Site

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Research Site

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Research Site

Haerbin, Heilongjiang, China

Site Status

Research Site

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Research Site

Changsha, Hunan, China

Site Status

Research Site

Jiangyin, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Research Site

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Research Site

Nantong, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Research Site

Nanchang, Jiangxi, China

Site Status

Research Site

Changchun, Jilin, China

Site Status

Research Site

Shenyang, Liaoning, China

Site Status

Research Site

Hohhot, Neimeng, China

Site Status

Research Site

Jinan, Shandong, China

Site Status

Research Site

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Research Site

Taiyuan, Shanxi, China

Site Status

Research Site

Xian, Shanxi, China

Site Status

Research Site

Yangquan, Shanxi, China

Site Status

Research Site

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Research Site

Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China

Site Status

Research Site

Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China

Site Status

Research Site

Kunming, Yunnan, China

Site Status

Research Site

Fuyang, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Research Site

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Research Site

Jinhua, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Research Site

Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D961DL00006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NIS-GCN-DUM-2010/1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id