Direct Discharge of Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding From the Emergency Department After Endoscopy

NCT ID: NCT03337256

Last Updated: 2020-04-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

762 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-01

Study Completion Date

2026-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common cause for attendance to the Emergency Department with a wide range of clinical severity, ranging from insignificant to life-threatening. While there is robust data to support the benefit of upper endoscopy within 24 hours of admission, the implementation of early upper endoscopy while patients are still in the emergency room has not been widely accepted due to lack of added benefit in terms of patient outcome such as mortality and re-bleeding rate. However, the use of upper endoscopy in the emergency room with the purpose of facilitating early discharge of low risk patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding has not been studied.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS) was developed in 2000 to identify very low risk patients who would not need any intervention and were of low risk of rebleeding and death. The GBS used objective clinical parameters that could be easily obtained in the emergency department and did not use any endoscopy findings as parameters. Unlike the Rockall score which was designed to identify high risk patients, the GBS was used to identify low risk patients who could be safely discharged from the emergency department without endoscopy and studies have shown it to be superior in this regard. The main limitation of GBS is its low specificity with only 4-8% of all patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding stratified as low risk. Furthermore, the GBS was derived from a Scottish gastrointestinal bleeding registry and may not be applicable to the local population.

Suitable patients attending the Accident \& Emergency Department for symptoms of upper gastrointestinal bleeding will be identified and recruited by the Accident \& Emergency physicians. Patients presenting to Endoscopy Centre after admission will also be recruited to collect clinical data.

Univariate analysis was carried out on the development set using Pearson's chi-square method to examine the association among the factors on the outcome. Variables significantly associated with 30 day re-attendance rate in univariate analyses (P\<=0.1) will be entered in multivariate logistic regression models. Risk factors which retained significance in multivariate analyses will be selected for incorporation into the risk score. A weighting will be assigned to each independent variable in the risk score, applying the corresponding adjusted odds ratio (AOR). The risk score for each subject is the sum of all the risk factors. To evaluate the predictive ability of the scoring system, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) was delineated. A concordance (c)-statistics was used to reflect the discriminative ability of the prediction tool.

Cost-effective economical model will be used in cost effective analysis of the use of early discharge strategy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Early endoscopy in emergency department + other clinical parameters
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GI bleeding score

Early endoscopy in emergency department + other clinical parameters

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

GI bleeding score

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Risk factor Score component value Age (years) 15-29 -2 30-44 -1.5 45-59 0 60-74 1.5

* 75 2.5 Haemoglobin(g/L)
* 10.0 0 \<9.9 2 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
* 110 0 90-109 1.5 \<90 2.5 Pulse (beats per min) \<100 0
* 100 1.5 Creatinine (mmol/L) \<200 0
* 200 3.5 Number of blood transfusion 0 0

1 1.5
* 2 2 Presenting symptom Melaena -1.5 Drug treatment Acid blcoking drug 1.5 anticoagulant 3 Endoscopy findings Clean-based ulcer -2 SRH or blood in stomach 4 Varices 5

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GI bleeding score

Risk factor Score component value Age (years) 15-29 -2 30-44 -1.5 45-59 0 60-74 1.5

* 75 2.5 Haemoglobin(g/L)
* 10.0 0 \<9.9 2 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
* 110 0 90-109 1.5 \<90 2.5 Pulse (beats per min) \<100 0
* 100 1.5 Creatinine (mmol/L) \<200 0
* 200 3.5 Number of blood transfusion 0 0

1 1.5
* 2 2 Presenting symptom Melaena -1.5 Drug treatment Acid blcoking drug 1.5 anticoagulant 3 Endoscopy findings Clean-based ulcer -2 SRH or blood in stomach 4 Varices 5

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients attending either the Prince of Wales Hospital or Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole hospital with symptoms of upper gastrointestinal bleeding will be initially resuscitated and stabilized in the Accident \& Emergency Department (AED) as per local practice

Exclusion Criteria

1. Incapable of providing informed consent
2. Age \<18 years old
3. Pregnancy
4. Medically unfit to receive an upper endoscopy procedure (require O2 supplement \>3L/min, persistent haemodynamic instability despite initial resuscitation, mental confusion)
5. Require admission to intensive care unit
6. Require emergency endoscopy for uncontrolled gastrointestinal bleeding
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aric Josun Hui

Conultant-in-charge, Combined Endoscopy Unit, Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aric Josun Hui, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GIB Score 002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.