Early Selective TAE to Severely Bleeding Peptic Ulcers After Their Initial Endoscopic Hemostasis

NCT ID: NCT01142180

Last Updated: 2018-07-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

258 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to determine if early angiographic embolization can forestall recurrent bleeding in selected high risk ulcers after their initial endoscopic control; to validate prospectively the investigators proposed in selecting high risk ulcers for recurrent bleeding in spite of maximal endoscopic control and profound acid suppression using high dose intravenous infusion of proton pump inhibitor; to characterize the nature of bleeding arteries in severely bleeding peptic ulcers and determine the efficacy of angiographic embolization in the prevention of recurrent bleeding and to establish safety profile of angiographic embolization as an early elective treatment to bleeding peptic ulcers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endoscopic therapy is now the treatment of choice in patients with actively bleeding peptic ulcers and ulcers with non-bleeding visible vessels. Following endoscopic control of bleeding, we showed that the use of a high dose intravenous infusion of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for 72 hours further reduced rate of recurrent bleeding \[Lau NEJM 2000\]. Recurrent bleeding still occurs in 8 to 10 percent of patients who receive the above treatment regime. The associated mortality following a rebleed is 4-10 fold higher when compared to those without recurrent bleeding. In a logistic regression model involving 1144 patients after successful endoscopic thermocoagulation to their bleeding peptic ulcers, we demonstrated that several factors independently predicted recurrent bleeding. They included hypotension, hemoglobin \<10g/dl, fresh blood in the stomach, ulcer size \> 2cm and active bleeding during endoscopy \[Wong Gut 2003\]. When we applied this model in a cohort of 945 patients who underwent endoscopic control of bleeding to their ulcers and adjunctive use of high dose intravenous PPI, 275 belonged to the high risk group. Of them, rebleeding leading to surgery or death occurred in 46 patients (16.7%)\[Chiu DDW 2007\]. Endoscopic treatment to bleeding peptic ulcers has its own limit. In an ex vivo bleeding model using canine mesenteric arteries, endoscopic thermocoagulation could only consistently seal arteries up to 2 mm in size \[Johnson Gastro 1987\]. Trans-arterial angiography allows clinicians to study and characterize bleeding arteries underneath peptic ulcers. In ulcers that erode into major arteries such as the gastro-duodenal artery complex and branches from left gastric artery, angiography complements endoscopic therapy in the form of selective coiling of the bleeding artery. Trans-arterial angiographic coiling can provide definitive control of bleeding from larger arteries i.e. \> 2 mm in size. In cohort studies, trans-arterial angiographic coiling has been shown to compare favorably to surgery, and is less invasive in the control of severe bleeding in peptic

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bleeding Peptic Ulcer Arterial Embolization

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TAE group

Patients will be undergone TAE after endoscopic hemostasis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TAE

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The procedure will be performed within 12 hours of endoscopic therapy. This is usually performed under conscious sedation

No TAE group

No TAE procedure will be performed after endoscopic treatment.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No TAE

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No TAE procedure will be performed after endoscopic treatment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TAE

The procedure will be performed within 12 hours of endoscopic therapy. This is usually performed under conscious sedation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No TAE

No TAE procedure will be performed after endoscopic treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Transarterial embolization

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Actively bleeding peptic ulcers (Forrest I), NBVV or Forrest IIa ulcer,
* Successful endoscopic hemostasis by combination treatment of injected epinephrine followed by either 3.2mm heat probe 30J (4 continuous pulses) or hemo-clipping (at least 2 clips) And one of the followings
* Spurting hemorrhage during endoscopy;
* Ulcer \>= 2 cm is determined by an opened biopsy forceps;
* Hb on admission of \< 9 g/dl; or
* Hypotension prior to endoscopy defined by SBP of \<90 mmHg AND HR of \>110 bmp

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

James Yun-wong Lau

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James Y LAU, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Endoscopy Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lau JYW, Pittayanon R, Wong KT, Pinjaroen N, Chiu PWY, Rerknimitr R, Holster IL, Kuipers EJ, Wu KC, Au KWL, Chan FKL, Sung JJY. Prophylactic angiographic embolisation after endoscopic control of bleeding to high-risk peptic ulcers: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2019 May;68(5):796-803. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316074. Epub 2018 May 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29802172 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TAE2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.