Helicobacter Pylori and the Long-term Risk of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
NCT ID: NCT01591486
Last Updated: 2015-08-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
904 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
1995-01-31
2013-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Given the uncertain clinical utility of Helicobacter Pylori (Hp) testing in ASA users, this prospective cohort study aims to determine whether testing for Hp will have any impact on the long-term incidence of ulcer bleeding in ASA users with high ulcer risk. The investigators hypothesize that among ASA users with Hp infection and ulcer bleeding, the long-term incidence of recurrent ulcer bleeding with ASA use will be low after eradication of Hp alone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Natural History of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug and Non-Helicobacter Pylori in Bleeding Peptic Ulcers
NCT00153712
The Influence of Helicobacter Pylori Eradication on Gastric Pathology: a Long-term, Prospective Cohort Study
NCT02933229
Helicobacter Pylori and Proton Pump Inhibitor
NCT02449941
Helicobacter Pylori and it's Hematological Impact
NCT03629587
China Survey of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
NCT01241266
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Emerging evidence from secondary analysis of cardiovascular trials suggests that aspirin also reduces the risk of all cancers, even at cardioprotective doses \[4\]. With increasing use of ASA for cardiothrombotic diseases and cancer prevention, the global burden of ASA-associated peptic ulcer disease is expected to increase.
A number of risk factors are known to increase the risk of peptic ulcer bleeding with ASA use. These include a history of peptic ulcer or ulcer bleeding, old age, renal failure, concurrent use of ASA and clopidogrel, and Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection \[5-7\]. Among these risk factors, concomitant use of clopidogrel and a history of peptic ulcer bleeding and are important predictors of ulcer bleeding with ASA use \[7\]. On the other hand, Hp is the only risk factor that can be modified. Eradication of Hp therefore offers a hope of reducing the risk of ulcer bleeding in ASA users.
Current European and U.S. guidelines unanimously recommend test-and-treat Hp infection in ASA users who are at risk of ulcer bleeding \[8-10\]. Despite these guidelines, the long-term benefit of eradicating Hp in high-risk ASA users is uncertain.
In a 6-month randomized trial of ASA users with Hp infection complicated by ulcer bleeding, patients were randomized to one-week of Hp eradication therapy alone or maintenance treatment with omeprazole after ulcers has healed. Our results showed that the incidence of recurrent ulcer bleeding was comparable between the group receiving Hp eradication alone (1.9%) and the group receiving omeprazole (0.9%) \[11\]. In another 12-month randomized trial, ASA users with Hp infection complicated by ulcer bleeding were randomized to one-week of eradication therapy alone or one week of eradication therapy plus maintenance treatment with lansoprazole. In this study, up to 15% of ASA users developed recurrent ulcer bleeding after eradication of Hp alone. Among the ASA users who developed recurrent ulcer bleeding, however, over two-thirds had failure Hp eradication or used concomitant NSAIDs \[12\].
In light of these conflicting findings, current guidelines recommend that co-therapy with a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) is still needed in high-risk ASA users after eradication of Hp \[8-10\]. Since PPIs are more effective in preventing ASA-associated ulcers in the presence of Hp infection \[13\], the clinical relevance of testing for Hp in high-risk ASA users becomes even more questionable. To date, the strategy of test-and-treat Hp for ASA users is not popular among primary care doctors or specialists.
One alternative gastroprotective strategy is to prescribe PPIs to all ASA users at high risk of ulcer bleeding and ignore Hp testing. However, poor compliance to gastroprotective co-therapy limits its effectiveness. Recently, health authorities issued warning about the the use of PPI and the risk of hip fractures and potential adverse drug-interactions between PPI and clopidogrel \[14,15\]. Clopidgorel is commonly used in combination with ASA for preventing coronary stent thrombosis but dual anti-platelet therapy will substantially increase the risk of ulcer bleeding \[5\]. If eradication of Hp can reduce the long-term risk of ulcer bleeding with ASA use, there may be a potential hope of limiting PPI use to very high risk ASA users.
Given the uncertain clinical utility of Hp testing in ASA users, this prospective cohort study aims to determine whether testing for Hp will have any impact on the long-term incidence of ulcer bleeding in ASA users with high ulcer risk. The investigators hypothesize that among ASA users with Hp infection and ulcer bleeding, the long-term incidence of recurrent ulcer bleeding with ASA use will be low after eradication of Hp alone.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hp-negative cohort
Hp-negative cohort
The second cohort consists of ASA users with ulcer bleeding but no current or past Hp infection, as evidenced by:
1. negative rapid urease test
2. negative histology for Hp infection on both initial and follow-up endoscopy
3. negative serology test
4. absence of intestinal metaplasia and atrophy on 4 random biopsies of the antrum and corpus
After ulcer healing, the Hp-negative cohort will receive enteric-coated ASA (\<160 mg daily) without regular co-prescription of anti-ulcer drugs.
No interventions assigned to this group
Hp-eradicated cohort
Hp-eradicated cohort This cohort consists of ASA users with ulcer bleeding and Hp infection who have healed ulcers and successful eradication of Hp on follow-up endoscopy. They will receive plain ASA (\<160 mg daily) without co-prescription of anti-ulcer drugs.
No interventions assigned to this group
Average-risk cohort
Average-risk cohort The third cohort consists of ASA-naive patients without a history of ulcer who attend the general outpatient clinic. They require long-term ASA for established cardiothrombotic diseases. They receive plain ASA (\<160 mg daily) without co-prescription of anti-ulcer drugs. Hp status will not be determined in this cohort because Hp testing is not justified in average-risk asymptomatic patients.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Anticipated regular use of ASA for cardiothrombotic diseases
Exclusion Criteria
2. Previous gastric surgery except for a patch repair
3. Gastroesophageal varices
4. Gastric-outlet obstruction
5. Gastroesophageal reflux disease requiring regular acid suppressive therapy
6. Renal failure (defined by a serum creatinine level of more than 200 μmol per liter)
7. Moribund conditions
8. Active malignancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Francis KL Chan
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Francis KL CHAN, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong (sar), , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2NA3NANC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.