Helicobacter Pylori and the Long-term Risk of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

NCT ID: NCT01591486

Last Updated: 2015-08-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

904 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

1995-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Low-dose aspirin (ASA) has emerged as the most important cause of peptic ulcer bleeding worldwide. In western countries, ASA has overtaken non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as a major cause of peptic ulcer bleeding in the elderly population \[1,2\]. Management of peptic ulcer bleeding in patients receiving ASA for cardiothrombotic diseases is a clinical dilemma. In a randomized trial of continuous versus interrupted ASA therapy after endoscopic treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding, patients who discontinued ASA had a 10-fold increased incidence of all-cause mortality compared to those who received continuous ASA therapy. On the other hand, patients receiving continuous ASA therapy had a two-fold increased risk of early rebleeding \[3\]. Thus, preventing the occurrence of peptic ulcer bleeding in ASA users is important in reducing morbidity and mortality.

Given the uncertain clinical utility of Helicobacter Pylori (Hp) testing in ASA users, this prospective cohort study aims to determine whether testing for Hp will have any impact on the long-term incidence of ulcer bleeding in ASA users with high ulcer risk. The investigators hypothesize that among ASA users with Hp infection and ulcer bleeding, the long-term incidence of recurrent ulcer bleeding with ASA use will be low after eradication of Hp alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Low-dose aspirin (ASA) has emerged as the most important cause of peptic ulcer bleeding worldwide. In western countries, ASA has overtaken NSAIDs as a major cause of peptic ulcer bleeding in the elderly population \[1,2\]. Management of peptic ulcer bleeding in patients receiving ASA for cardiothrombotic diseases is a clinical dilemma. In a randomized trial of continuous versus interrupted ASA therapy after endoscopic treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding, patients who discontinued ASA had a 10-fold increased incidence of all-cause mortality compared to those who received continuous ASA therapy. On the other hand, patients receiving continuous ASA therapy had a two-fold increased risk of early rebleeding \[3\]. Thus, preventing the occurrence of peptic ulcer bleeding in ASA users is important in reducing morbidity and mortality.

Emerging evidence from secondary analysis of cardiovascular trials suggests that aspirin also reduces the risk of all cancers, even at cardioprotective doses \[4\]. With increasing use of ASA for cardiothrombotic diseases and cancer prevention, the global burden of ASA-associated peptic ulcer disease is expected to increase.

A number of risk factors are known to increase the risk of peptic ulcer bleeding with ASA use. These include a history of peptic ulcer or ulcer bleeding, old age, renal failure, concurrent use of ASA and clopidogrel, and Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection \[5-7\]. Among these risk factors, concomitant use of clopidogrel and a history of peptic ulcer bleeding and are important predictors of ulcer bleeding with ASA use \[7\]. On the other hand, Hp is the only risk factor that can be modified. Eradication of Hp therefore offers a hope of reducing the risk of ulcer bleeding in ASA users.

Current European and U.S. guidelines unanimously recommend test-and-treat Hp infection in ASA users who are at risk of ulcer bleeding \[8-10\]. Despite these guidelines, the long-term benefit of eradicating Hp in high-risk ASA users is uncertain.

In a 6-month randomized trial of ASA users with Hp infection complicated by ulcer bleeding, patients were randomized to one-week of Hp eradication therapy alone or maintenance treatment with omeprazole after ulcers has healed. Our results showed that the incidence of recurrent ulcer bleeding was comparable between the group receiving Hp eradication alone (1.9%) and the group receiving omeprazole (0.9%) \[11\]. In another 12-month randomized trial, ASA users with Hp infection complicated by ulcer bleeding were randomized to one-week of eradication therapy alone or one week of eradication therapy plus maintenance treatment with lansoprazole. In this study, up to 15% of ASA users developed recurrent ulcer bleeding after eradication of Hp alone. Among the ASA users who developed recurrent ulcer bleeding, however, over two-thirds had failure Hp eradication or used concomitant NSAIDs \[12\].

In light of these conflicting findings, current guidelines recommend that co-therapy with a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) is still needed in high-risk ASA users after eradication of Hp \[8-10\]. Since PPIs are more effective in preventing ASA-associated ulcers in the presence of Hp infection \[13\], the clinical relevance of testing for Hp in high-risk ASA users becomes even more questionable. To date, the strategy of test-and-treat Hp for ASA users is not popular among primary care doctors or specialists.

One alternative gastroprotective strategy is to prescribe PPIs to all ASA users at high risk of ulcer bleeding and ignore Hp testing. However, poor compliance to gastroprotective co-therapy limits its effectiveness. Recently, health authorities issued warning about the the use of PPI and the risk of hip fractures and potential adverse drug-interactions between PPI and clopidogrel \[14,15\]. Clopidgorel is commonly used in combination with ASA for preventing coronary stent thrombosis but dual anti-platelet therapy will substantially increase the risk of ulcer bleeding \[5\]. If eradication of Hp can reduce the long-term risk of ulcer bleeding with ASA use, there may be a potential hope of limiting PPI use to very high risk ASA users.

Given the uncertain clinical utility of Hp testing in ASA users, this prospective cohort study aims to determine whether testing for Hp will have any impact on the long-term incidence of ulcer bleeding in ASA users with high ulcer risk. The investigators hypothesize that among ASA users with Hp infection and ulcer bleeding, the long-term incidence of recurrent ulcer bleeding with ASA use will be low after eradication of Hp alone.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bacterial Infection Due to Helicobacter Pylori (H. Pylori) Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hp-negative cohort

Hp-negative cohort

The second cohort consists of ASA users with ulcer bleeding but no current or past Hp infection, as evidenced by:

1. negative rapid urease test
2. negative histology for Hp infection on both initial and follow-up endoscopy
3. negative serology test
4. absence of intestinal metaplasia and atrophy on 4 random biopsies of the antrum and corpus

After ulcer healing, the Hp-negative cohort will receive enteric-coated ASA (\<160 mg daily) without regular co-prescription of anti-ulcer drugs.

No interventions assigned to this group

Hp-eradicated cohort

Hp-eradicated cohort This cohort consists of ASA users with ulcer bleeding and Hp infection who have healed ulcers and successful eradication of Hp on follow-up endoscopy. They will receive plain ASA (\<160 mg daily) without co-prescription of anti-ulcer drugs.

No interventions assigned to this group

Average-risk cohort

Average-risk cohort The third cohort consists of ASA-naive patients without a history of ulcer who attend the general outpatient clinic. They require long-term ASA for established cardiothrombotic diseases. They receive plain ASA (\<160 mg daily) without co-prescription of anti-ulcer drugs. Hp status will not be determined in this cohort because Hp testing is not justified in average-risk asymptomatic patients.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding confirmed by endoscopy
2. Anticipated regular use of ASA for cardiothrombotic diseases

Exclusion Criteria

1. Uncontrolled bleeding requiring surgical intervention
2. Previous gastric surgery except for a patch repair
3. Gastroesophageal varices
4. Gastric-outlet obstruction
5. Gastroesophageal reflux disease requiring regular acid suppressive therapy
6. Renal failure (defined by a serum creatinine level of more than 200 μmol per liter)
7. Moribund conditions
8. Active malignancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Francis KL Chan

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Francis KL CHAN, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong (sar), , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2NA3NANC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.